Free choice free relative clauses in Italian and Romanian

This paper aims to bring back to the linguistic scene a largely neglected character that is encountered in Italian and Romanian. This character exhibits a novel combination of morphological, syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic features that, separately, are already attested across languages. It looks like an embedded non-interrogative wh-clause introduced by a wh-phrase that is either made of or contains a wh-root with an affix: the suffix -unque in Italian or the prefix ori- in Romanian. We show that this construction exhibits the same morpho-syntactic properties as -ever free relative clauses in English and the same semantic and pragmatic properties as headed relative clauses introduced by the free choice determiner any in English. Therefore, we label our character a free choice free relative clause. We argue for a syntactic analysis of free choice free relative clauses as true free relatives rather than headed relatives and for a semantic analysis along the lines of some recent proposals about related free choice constructions. We also discuss the meaning of wh-words occurring in free choice free relatives and in related constructions and emphasize the importance of not taking for granted that morpho-syntactic identity necessarily coincides with semantic and pragmatic identity across languages.

[1]  Kjell Johan Saeboe.  The Semantics Of Scandinavian Free Choice Items , 2001 .

[2]  Paula Menéndez-Benito,et al.  The Grammar of Choice , 2007 .

[3]  Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng,et al.  (In)Definiteness, Polarity, and the Role of wh-morphology in Free Choice , 2006, J. Semant..

[4]  Veneeta Dayal.  Free Relatives and "Ever": Identity and Free Choice Readings , 1997 .

[5]  Anamaria Fălăuș.  Romanian epistemic indefinites , 2015 .

[6]  Maria Aloni,et al.  Epistemic indefinites and methods of identification , 2015 .

[7]  J. Jayez,et al.  Free Choiceness and Non-Individuation , 2005 .

[8]  Betty Birner.  Free Choice in Romanian , 2005 .

[9]  Roberto Zamparelli.  On Singular Existential Quantifiers in Italian , 2008 .

[10]  Veneeta Dayal.  The universal force of free choice any , 2004 .

[11]  Thomas Givon,et al.  Ute reference grammar , 1982 .

[12]  Edward L. Keenan,et al.  The Semantics of Determiners , 1996 .

[13]  Ivano Caponigro,et al.  The puzzling degraded status of who free relative clauses in English , 2015, English Language and Linguistics.

[14]  Jean Ehrenkranz Legrand.  Or and any : the semantics and syntax of two logical operators , 1975 .

[15]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Broaden Your Views: Implicatures of Domain Widening and the Logicality of Language , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[16]  D. Farkas.  On the Semantics of Subjunctive Complements , 1992 .

[17]  Annett Baier,et al.  Logic In Grammar Polarity Free Choice And Intervention , 2016 .

[18]  Ivano Caponigro,et al.  Silent prepositions: Evidence from free relatives * , 2008 .

[19]  Carlo Cecchetto,et al.  Relabeling Heads: A Unified Account for Relativization Structures , 2011, Linguistic Inquiry.

[20]  Maria Aloni,et al.  FREE CHOICE AND EXHAUSTIFICATION: AN ACCOUNT OF SUBTRIGGING EFFECTS , 2005 .

[21]  Anastasia Giannakidou,et al.  The Meaning of Free Choice , 2001 .

[22]  Veneeta Dayal,et al.  Any as Inherently Modal , 1998 .

[23]  J. V. D. Auwera.  The semantics of determiners , 1982 .

[24]  Luigi Rizzi.  Spiegazione e teoria grammaticale , 1990 .

[25]  Laurence R. Horn.  A Natural History of Negation , 1989 .

[26]  Donka F. Farkas.  Extreme Non-Specificity in Romanian , 2002 .

[27]  Daphna Heller,et al.  On identification and transworld identity in natural language: the case of -ever free relatives , 2011 .

[28]  Paula Menéndez-Benito.  On universal Free Choice items , 2010 .

[29]  Roumyana Izvorski.  Free Adjunct Free Relatives , 2000 .

[30]  Ivano Caponigro,et al.  The Nominal Nature of where, when, and how: Evidence from Free Relatives , 2009, Linguistic Inquiry.

[31]  Maria Aloni,et al.  Semantics and pragmatics of indefinites: methodology for a synchronic and diachronic corpus study , 2009 .

[33]  Ivano Caponigro,et al.  The Semantic Contributions of Wh-words and Type Shifts: Evidence from Free Relatives Crosslinguistically , 2004 .

[34]  Lucia M. Tovena,et al.  Epistemic Determiners , 2006, J. Semant..

[35]  Hans Reichenbach,et al.  Elements of symbolic logic , 1948 .

[36]  Luis Alonso-Ovalle,et al.  Epistemic indefinites : exploring modality beyond the verbal domain , 2015 .

[37]  Pauline Jacobson.  On the Quantificational Force of English Free Relatives , 1995 .

[38]  H. Rullmann,et al.  Evidentials as epistemic modals: Evidence from St'át'imcets , 2008 .

[39]  Richard Montague,et al.  The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English , 1973 .

[40]  Carlo Cecchetto,et al.  From Grammar to Meaning: The Spontaneous Logicality of Language , 2013 .

[41]  D. Farkas.  Intensional descriptions and the romance subjunctive mood , 1985 .

[42]  Maria Aloni,et al.  Free choice, modals, and imperatives , 2007 .

[43]  A. Grosu.  Relative Clause Constructions and unbounded dependencies , 2013 .

[44]  Ivano Caponigro,et al.  Free Not to Ask: On the Semantics of Free Relatives and Wh-words Cross-linguistically , 2003 .

[45]  Veneeta Dayal,et al.  A Viability Constraint on Alternatives for Free Choice , 2013 .