International variation in and factors associated with hospital readmission after myocardial infarction.

CONTEXT ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treatment has improved outcomes and shortened hospital stay. Recently, 30-day readmission rates have been proposed as a metric for care of patients with STEMI. However, international rates and predictors of 30-day readmission after STEMI have not been studied. OBJECTIVE To determine international variation in and predictors of 30-day readmission rates after STEMI and country-level care patterns. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Post hoc analysis of the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction trial that enrolled 5745 patients with STEMI at 296 sites in the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and 13 European countries from July 13, 2004, to May 11, 2006. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of all-cause and nonelective 30-day postdischarge readmission. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Predictors of 30-day postdischarge all-cause and nonelective readmissions. RESULTS Of 5571 patients with STEMI who survived to hospital discharge, 631 (11.3%) were readmitted within 30 days. Thirty-day readmission rates were higher for the United States than other countries (14.5% vs 9.9%; P < .001). Median length of stay was shortest for US patients (3 days; interquartile range, 2-4 days) and longest for Germany (8 days; interquartile range, 6-11 days). In multivariable regression, the predictors of 30-day readmission included multivessel disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.65-2.35) and US location (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.37-2.07). Excluding elective readmission for revascularization, US enrollment was still an independent predictor of readmission (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.20-1.96). After adjustment of the models for country-level median length of stay, US location was no longer an independent predictor of 30-day all-cause or nonelective readmission. Location in the United States was not a predictor of in-hospital death (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.60-1.30) or 30-day postadmission death (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.72-1.39). CONCLUSIONS In this multinational study, there was variation across countries in 30-day readmission rates after STEMI, with readmission rates higher in the United States than in other countries. However, this difference was greatly attenuated after adjustment for length of stay.

[1]  D. Chamberlain,et al.  Policy for early discharge after acute myocardial infarction. , 1980, British medical journal.

[2]  R. Califf,et al.  International differences in evolution of early discharge after acute myocardial infarction , 2004, The Lancet.

[3]  R. Schröder Prognostic Impact of Early ST-Segment Resolution in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2004, Circulation.

[4]  C. Yancy,et al.  Relationship between early physician follow-up and 30-day readmission among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for heart failure. , 2010, JAMA.

[5]  D. Levy,et al.  Temporal Trends in Coronary Heart Disease Mortality and Sudden Cardiac Death From 1950 to 1999: The Framingham Heart Study , 2004, Circulation.

[6]  David W Baker,et al.  Trends in postdischarge mortality and readmissions: has length of stay declined too far? , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  M S Golden,et al.  Prevalence of total coronary occlusion during the early hours of transmural myocardial infarction. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  S. Normand,et al.  Patterns of Hospital Performance in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure 30-Day Mortality and Readmission , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[9]  G. Anderson,et al.  Multinational Comparisons of Health Systems Data, 2008 , 2000 .

[10]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction (APEX AMI): a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study of pexelizumab in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2005, American heart journal.

[11]  J. Alpert,et al.  Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction , 2008 .

[12]  S. Brener Insights into the pathophysiology of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2006, American heart journal.

[13]  P. Armstrong,et al.  A Model for Predicting Mortality in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results From the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[14]  J. McMurray,et al.  Contribution of modern cardiovascular treatment and risk factor changes to the decline in coronary heart disease mortality in Scotland between 1975 and 1994 , 1999, Heart.

[15]  B. J. Gersh Explaining the Decrease in U.S. Deaths from Coronary Disease, 1980–2000 , 2008 .

[16]  Ajai Kumar Jain,et al.  PexeLizumab for Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled trial , 2007 .

[17]  Julia A. Critchley,et al.  Explaining the Decrease in U.S. Deaths from Coronary Disease, 1980–2000 , 2004 .

[18]  M. Simoons,et al.  A clinical trial comparing primary coronary angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  M. Hashemzadeh,et al.  Trends in the age adjusted mortality from acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States (1988-2004) based on race, gender, infarct location and comorbidities. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Association of early follow-up after acute myocardial infarction with higher rates of medication use. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[21]  H. Krumholz,et al.  All-cause readmission and repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort of medicare patients. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  M. Desai,et al.  Statistical Models and Patient Predictors of Readmission for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[23]  A. Jha,et al.  The Association Between Hospital Volume and Processes, Outcomes, and Costs of Care for Congestive Heart Failure , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  J. Alpert,et al.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2007, European heart journal.

[25]  W. Rogers,et al.  Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999: the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 1, 2 and 3. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.