An automated protocol for performance benchmarking a widefield fluorescence microscope

Widefield fluorescence microscopy is a highly used tool for visually assessing biological samples and for quantifying cell responses. Despite its widespread use in high content analysis and other imaging applications, few published methods exist for evaluating and benchmarking the analytical performance of a microscope. Easy‐to‐use benchmarking methods would facilitate the use of fluorescence imaging as a quantitative analytical tool in research applications, and would aid the determination of instrumental method validation for commercial product development applications. We describe and evaluate an automated method to characterize a fluorescence imaging system's performance by benchmarking the detection threshold, saturation, and linear dynamic range to a reference material. The benchmarking procedure is demonstrated using two different materials as the reference material, uranyl‐ion‐doped glass and Schott 475 GG filter glass. Both are suitable candidate reference materials that are homogeneously fluorescent and highly photostable, and the Schott 475 GG filter glass is currently commercially available. In addition to benchmarking the analytical performance, we also demonstrate that the reference materials provide for accurate day to day intensity calibration. Published 2014 Wiley Periodicals Inc.

[1]  Paul C DeRose,et al.  Qualification of a fluorescence spectrometer for measuring true fluorescence spectra. , 2007, The Review of scientific instruments.

[2]  Ute Resch-Genger,et al.  State-of-the art comparability of corrected emission spectra. 1. Spectral correction with physical transfer standards and spectral fluorescence standards by expert laboratories. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[3]  John T Elliott,et al.  Cell volume distributions reveal cell growth rates and division times. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  J. Kiefer,et al.  Sequential minimax search for a maximum , 1953 .

[5]  S. Lockett,et al.  Calibration and standardization of the emission light path of confocal microscopes , 2006, Journal of microscopy.

[6]  James H Walker,et al.  Spectral radiance calibrations , 1987 .

[7]  M. Model,et al.  A standard for calibration and shading correction of a fluorescence microscope. , 2001, Cytometry.

[8]  Anne-Marie Girard,et al.  Quality assurance testing for modern optical imaging systems. , 2011, Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada.

[9]  J C Wood,et al.  Fundamental flow cytometer properties governing sensitivity and resolution. , 1998, Cytometry.

[10]  Jeff W. Lichtman,et al.  A quantitative fluorescence-imaging technique for studying acetylcholine receptor turnover at neuromuscular junctions in living animals , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Characterization of instrumentation and calibrators for quantitative microfluorometry for immunofluorescence tests , 1989, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[12]  Murray Evaluating the performance of fluorescence microscopes , 1998, Journal of microscopy.

[13]  S. Zeng,et al.  Localization-based super-resolution microscopy with an sCMOS camera part II: experimental methodology for comparing sCMOS with EMCCD cameras. , 2012, Optics express.

[14]  J. Janesick,et al.  Charge-Coupled-Device Charge-Collection Efficiency And The Photon-Transfer Technique , 1987 .

[15]  Ian T. Young,et al.  Photonic calibration for fluorescence microscopy , 2008, SPIE BiOS.

[16]  Hongqiang Ma,et al.  Localization-based super-resolution microscopy with an sCMOS camera. , 2011, Optics express.

[17]  U. Resch-Genger,et al.  How to Improve Quality Assurance in Fluorometry: Fluorescence-Inherent Sources of Error and Suited Fluorescence Standards , 2005, Journal of Fluorescence.

[18]  Edgar S. Etz,et al.  Relative Intensity Correction of Raman Spectrometers: NIST SRMs 2241 through 2243 for 785 nm, 532 nm, and 488 nm/514.5 nm Excitation , 2007, Applied spectroscopy.

[19]  G J Brakenhoff,et al.  Image calibration in fluorescence microscopy , 2004, Journal of microscopy.

[20]  S. Lockett,et al.  Quantitative precision of an automated, fluorescence-based image cytometer. , 1992, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[21]  Gary W. Kramer,et al.  Characterization of Standard Reference Material 2940, Mn-ion-doped glass, spectral correction standard for fluorescence , 2011 .

[22]  A.A. Gaertner Spectral irradiance calibrations at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) , 2009 .

[23]  I. T. Young,et al.  Absolute fluorescence calibration , 2006, SPIE BiOS.

[24]  Ute Resch-Genger,et al.  State-of-the art comparability of corrected emission spectra. 2. Field laboratory assessment of calibration performance using spectral fluorescence standards. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.