The Emergence of the Silent Witness

The late 19th-century discovery of X-rays befuddled not only the scientific world but also the medical and legal worlds. The possibility of looking into the human body as if through an open window challenged the time-honored medical monopoly over the inner cavities of the human body. Likewise, the possibility of visualizing objects unavailable to the naked eye challenged the established legal theories and practices of illustration and proof. This paper describes the reactions to those challenges by the medical and the legal professions in the USA. The two professions are treated as connected social institutions, producing ongoing negotiations through which legal doctrines affect medicine no less than scientific discoveries and medical applications affect the law. This joint analysis rewards us with a rich story about an early and overlooked chapter in X-ray history on the professionalization of radiology, the origins of defensive medicine, and the evolution of the legal theory and practice of visual evidence.

[1]  Margaret W. Rossiter,et al.  The formation of the American scientific community. The American Association for the Advancement of Science 1848–60 , 1976, Medical History.

[2]  Heather Devine.  Science at the Bar: Law, Science and Technology in America , 1997 .

[3]  L. Tancredi.  Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom , 1992 .

[4]  The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal , 1886, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[5]  D. Futuyma,et al.  Science On Trial , 1982 .

[6]  L. Daston,et al.  The Image of Objectivity , 1992 .

[7]  Simon A. Cole,et al.  What Counts for Identity? The Historical Origins of the Methodology of Latent Fingerprint Identification , 1999, Science in Context.

[8]  B. Lerner.  The Perils of "X-ray Vision": How Radiographic Images Have Historically Influenced Perception , 2015, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[9]  Jennifer L. Mnookin.  The Image of Truth: Photographic Evidence and the Power of Analogy , 1998 .

[10]  H. Redetzky.  [Expert testimony]. , 1952, Das Deutsche Gesundheitswesen.

[11]  D. Farber,et al.  Beyond All Reason: The Radical Assault on Truth in American Law , 1997 .

[12]  Christopher Lawrence,et al.  Technology in the hospital: transforming patient care in the early twentieth century , 1997, Medical History.

[13]  A. Daemmrich.  The Evidence Does Not Speak for Itself , 1998 .

[14]  C. Holland.  X Rays in 1896 , 1938 .

[15]  Kenneth R. Foster,et al.  Judging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts , 1997 .

[16]  B. Asher.  The Professional Vision , 1994 .

[17]  G. Kaye,et al.  Wilhelm Conrad Rontgen and the Early History of the Roentgen Rays , 1934, Nature.

[18]  M. Lynch.  The Discursive Production of Uncertainty , 1998 .

[19]  B. Pasveer,et al.  Knowledge of shadows: the introduction of X-ray images in medicine. , 1989, Sociology of health & illness.

[20]  O. Braddick,et al.  Seeing in Depth , 2008 .

[21]  P. Huber,et al.  Galileo`s revenge , 1991 .

[22]  Medical Malpractice in Nineteenth-Century America: Origins and Legacy , 1990 .

[23]  Edson R. Sunderland.  The Inefficiency of the American Jury , 1915 .

[24]  J. Dumit.  Objective Brains, Prejudicial Images , 1999, Science in Context.

[25]  P. Hodges.  Development of Diagnostic X-Ray Apparatus During the First Fifty Years , 1945 .

[26]  G. Edmond,et al.  Manifest Destiny: Law and Science in America' , 1996 .

[27]  EXPERT TESTIMONY, ITS ABUSE AND REFORMATION , 1910 .

[28]  J. Wigmore.  A Treatise on the System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law , 1905 .

[29]  Kenneth J. Cheesbro.  Galileo's Retort: Peter Huber's Junk Scholarship , 1993 .

[30]  E. Brecher,et al.  The rays : a history of radiology in the United States and Canada , 1970 .

[31]  G. Edmond,et al.  Juggling science: From polemic to pastiche , 1999 .

[32]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Science at the Bar , 1995 .

[33]  A. W. Fuchs.  Evolution of roentgen film. , 1956, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[34]  E. O. Bregman,et al.  The Present Status. , 1926 .

[35]  R. Arns.  The High-Vacuum X-Ray Tube: Technological Change in Social Context , 1997, Technology and Culture.

[36]  J. C. Mohr.  Doctors and the law : medical jurisprudence in nineteenth-century America , 1995 .

[37]  R. W. Westbrook.  A Practical Treatise on Fractures and Dislocations , 1885, Edinburgh Medical Journal.

[38]  W. Röntgen,et al.  ON A NEW KIND OF RAYS. , 1896, Science.

[39]  THE X-RAY FROM A MEDICO-LEGAL STANDPOINT. , 1898 .

[40]  C. J. Frankel.  DOCTORS AND THE LAW. , 1964, Clinical medicine.

[41]  Christopher Lawrence,et al.  Medicine and the reign of technology , 1979, Medical History.

[42]  H John,et al.  Admissibility of Photographs as Evidence , 1929 .

[43]  T. Golan.  The History of Scientific Expert Testimony in the English Courtroom , 1999, Science in Context.

[44]  Charles T. McCormick,et al.  Handbook of the law of evidence , 1955 .

[45]  A. Sandor.  The history of professional liability suits in the United States. , 1957, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[46]  J. Tighe.  A QUESTION OF RESPONSIBILITY: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICAN FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY, 1838-1930 , 1983 .

[47]  E. Halperin.  X-rays at the bar, 1896-1910. , 1988, Investigative Radiology.