Denture scanning technique for computer-guided implant-supported restoration treatment of edentulous patients.

The traditional protocol for guided surgery in a completely edentulous patient is time-consuming, requiring the fabrication of a radiographic guide and a dual cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. Using intraoral scanners to scan the edentulous ridge and the existing denture has been advocated to simplify the process. This technique offers a versatile, precise, and predictable method for the digital planning workflow in edentulous patients for either a fixed or removable restoration. In addition, this approach can help improve the quality of the guide produced by reducing CBCT artifacts associated with the existing denture, as well as capture the soft-tissue contour to further improve the fit of the surgical guide.

[1]  D. Gaudillière,et al.  Freehand Versus Guided Surgery: Factors Influencing Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement. , 2017, Implant dentistry.

[2]  A. Albiero,et al.  Computer‐assisted surgery and intraoral welding technique for immediate implant‐supported rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla: case report and technical description , 2016, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[3]  Silvio Mario Meloni,et al.  Implant treatment software planning and guided flapless surgery with immediate provisional prosthesis delivery in the fully edentulous maxilla. A retrospective analysis of 15 consecutively treated patients. , 2010, European journal of oral implantology.

[4]  Hom-Lay Wang,et al.  Using Digital Technique to Obtain the Ideal Soft Tissue Contour in Immediate Implants With Provisionalization. , 2019, Implant dentistry.

[5]  R Jacobs,et al.  The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: a critical review on accuracy. , 2008, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[6]  German O Gallucci,et al.  Descriptive analysis of implant and prosthodontic survival rates with fixed implant-supported rehabilitations in the edentulous maxilla. , 2009, Journal of periodontology.

[7]  Camille Gannam,et al.  Implant-prosthodontic classification of the edentulous jaw for treatment planning with fixed rehabilitations. , 2014, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[8]  Albert Mehl,et al.  Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. , 2013, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  S. Ganz Presurgical planning with CT-derived fabrication of surgical guides. , 2005, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[10]  M. Esposito,et al.  Computer-guided flapless placement of immediately loaded dental implants in the edentulous maxilla: a pilot prospective case series. , 2008, European journal of oral implantology.

[11]  June-Sung Shim,et al.  Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark , 2017, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of computer‐guided versus conventional implant‐retained hybrid prostheses: A long‐term retrospective analysis of treatment protocols , 2018, Journal of periodontology.

[13]  Filip Schutyser,et al.  A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study. , 2005, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[14]  R. Raja,et al.  Implant surgical guides: From the past to the present , 2013, Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences.

[15]  Regina Mericske-Stern,et al.  Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study. , 2009, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.