Validation of Semantic Interoperability between IoT Platforms

The growing trend towards the exchange of data between heterogeneous objects and platforms have increased the level of complexity in the Internet of Things (IoT) area. Beyond those, to enable seamless resource sharing between different IoT systems, efforts by academia and industry have currently focused on achieving semantic interoperability between IoT platforms. That involves the delivery of dynamic interaction between platforms to interconnect the variety of smart objects covering both multiple technologies and intelligent services. With this in mind, the main goal of this work is to propose a mechanism to validate and achieve interoperability between IoT platforms. A motivating example is described and analyzed along with the implementation of the proposed system.

[1]  Keyur K. Patel,et al.  Internet of Things-IOT: Definition, Characteristics, Architecture, Enabling Technologies, Application & Future Challenges , 2016 .

[2]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  Ioannis G. Askoxylakis,et al.  The Interoperability of Things: Interoperable solutions as an enabler for IoT and Web 3.0 , 2018, 2018 IEEE 23rd International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD).

[4]  Kamran Sartipi,et al.  Cross-domain information and service interoperability , 2008, iiWAS.

[5]  Michael Blackstock,et al.  Toward interoperability in a web of things , 2013, UbiComp.

[6]  Mahmoud Elkhodr,et al.  The Internet of Things: New Interoperability, Management and Security Challenges , 2016, ArXiv.

[7]  George Spanoudakis,et al.  Architectural Patterns for Secure IoT Orchestrations , 2019, 2019 Global IoT Summit (GIoTS).

[8]  Giancarlo Fortino,et al.  Towards Multi-layer Interoperability of Heterogeneous IoT Platforms: The INTER-IoT Approach , 2018, IoT 2018.

[9]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[10]  Mohammed Atiquzzaman,et al.  Interoperability in Internet of Things Infrastructure: Classification, Challenges, and Future Work , 2017, IoTaaS.

[11]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[12]  George Spanoudakis,et al.  Towards IoT Orchestrations with Security, Privacy, Dependability and Interoperability Guarantees , 2019, 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[13]  Darko Anicic,et al.  End-to-End Semantic Interoperability Mechanisms for IoT , 2019, 2019 IEEE 24th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD).

[15]  John Soldatos,et al.  Design principles for utility-driven services and cloud-based computing modelling for the Internet of Things , 2014, Int. J. Web Grid Serv..

[16]  Vivek Kulkarni,et al.  SEMIoTICS Architectural Framework: End-to-end Security, Connectivity and Interoperability for Industrial IoT , 2019, 2019 Global IoT Summit (GIoTS).

[17]  Sotiris Ioannidis,et al.  Smart End-to-end Massive IoT Interoperability, Connectivity and Security (SEMIoTICS) , 2019, ERCIM News.

[18]  Mohammed Atiquzzaman,et al.  Interoperability in Internet of Things: Taxonomies and Open Challenges , 2018, Mobile Networks and Applications.