Social Norms, Morals and Self-interest as Determinants of Pro-environment Behaviours: The Case of Household Recycling

This paper considers the role which selfish, moral and social incentives and pressures play in explaining the extent to which stated choices over pro-environment behaviours vary across individuals. The empirical context is choices over household waste contracts and recycling actions in Poland. A theoretical model is used to show how cost-based motives and the desire for a positive self and social image combine to determine the utility from alternative choices of recycling behaviour. We then describe a discrete choice experiment designed to empirically investigate the effects such drivers have on stated choices. A hybrid logit model is used to link statements over attitudes to recycling to choices, dealing with a potential endogeneity problem caused by the joint effects of un-observables on attitudes and choices. We find that a substantial share of our respondents prefer to sort their waste at home rather than in a central sorting facility. This preference is associated with a moral/intrinsic motivation, involving a belief that sorting at home is more thorough than central sorting.

[1]  Gorm Kipperberg,et al.  A Comparison of Household Recycling Behaviors in Norway and the United States , 2007 .

[2]  Yen-Lien Kuo,et al.  Wasting Time? Recycling Incentives in Urban Taiwan and Japan , 2010 .

[3]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  On the variability of hybrid discrete choice models , 2014 .

[4]  J. Gibbons,et al.  The effect of individual 'ability to choose' (scale heterogeneity) on the valuation of environmental goods , 2011 .

[5]  N. Hanley,et al.  We want to sort! – assessing households’ preferences for sorting waste , 2014 .

[6]  Justin L. Tobias,et al.  What are the consequences of consequentiality , 2009 .

[7]  Johan Eyckmans,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of voluntary solid waste reduction policies: methodology and a Flemish case study. , 2008, Waste management.

[8]  Christian A. Vossler,et al.  Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments , 2010 .

[9]  C. Manski.  The structure of random utility models , 1977 .

[10]  Annegrete Bruvoll,et al.  On the Value of Households' Recycling Efforts , 2002 .

[11]  N. Hanley,et al.  Effects of Experience, Knowledge and Signals on Willingness to Pay for a Public Good , 2014 .

[12]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study , 2007 .

[13]  Jean-Daniel Saphores,et al.  Information and the decision to recycle: results from a survey of US households , 2009 .

[14]  C. Knussen,et al.  An analysis of intentions to recycle household waste: The roles of past behaviour, perceived habit, and perceived lack of facilities , 2004 .

[15]  Marcello Basili,et al.  Analysing demand for environmental quality: a willingness to pay/accept study in the province of Siena (Italy). , 2006, Waste management.

[16]  A. Huhtala.  Income effects and the inconvenience of private provision of public goods for bads: The case of recycling in Finland , 2010 .

[17]  Owen R. Phillips,et al.  A Bayesian examination of information and uncertainty in contingent valuation , 2007 .

[18]  S. Watson,et al.  Understanding the consequences of consequentiality: Testing the validity of stated preferences in the field , 2012 .

[19]  Robin R. Jenkins,et al.  The Determinants of Household Recycling: A Material Specific Analysis of Recycling Program Features and Unit Pricing , 2003 .

[20]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  The discrete choice experiment approach to environmental contingent valuation , 2014 .

[21]  A. Daly,et al.  Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latent variable choice model: a study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour , 2012 .

[22]  Gorm Kipperberg,et al.  Heterogeneous Preferences for Community Recycling Programs , 2012 .

[23]  Ricardo A. Daziano,et al.  Incorporating pro-environmental preferences towards green automobile technologies through a Bayesian hybrid choice model , 2013 .

[24]  Kjell Arne Brekke,et al.  Social Interaction in Responsibility Ascription: The Case of Household Recycling , 2010, Land Economics.

[25]  Christian A. Vossler,et al.  Bridging the gap between the field and the lab: Environmental goods, policy maker input, and consequentiality , 2009 .

[26]  P. Chiappori,et al.  A Theory of the Allocation of Time " , 2014 .

[27]  R. Berrens,et al.  Assessing Perceived Consequentiality: Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Survey on Global Climate Change , 2009 .

[28]  K. Nyborg.  I Don't Want to Hear About It: Rational Ignorance Among Duty-Oriented Consumers , 2008 .

[29]  Rajiv Kashyap,et al.  Consumer recycling: role of incentives, information, and social class , 2007 .

[30]  David Owens,et al.  An Unlucky Feeling: Overconfidence and Noisy Feedback , 2010 .

[31]  Shasikanta Nandeibam,et al.  Recycling: Social norms and warm-glow revisited , 2013 .

[32]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Accounting for Latent Attitudes in Willingness-to-Pay Studies: The Case of Coastal Water Quality Improvements in Tobago , 2012 .

[33]  David Uzzell,et al.  Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme. , 2010, The British journal of social psychology.

[34]  Joel L. Schrag,et al.  First Impressions Matter: A Model of Confirmatory Bias , 1999 .

[35]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Practical and empirical identifiability of hybrid discrete choice models , 2012 .

[36]  J. List,et al.  Consequentiality: A Theoretical and Experimental Exploration of a Single Binary Choice , 2014, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.

[37]  Kristin Magnussen,et al.  Household behaviour and attitudes with respect to recycling food waste--experiences from focus groups. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[38]  Justin M. Rao,et al.  The Good News-Bad News Effect: Asymmetric Processing of Objective Information about Yourself , 2011 .

[39]  Ben White,et al.  Introduction to Environmental Economics [2nd ed.] , 2013 .

[40]  Tim Kurz,et al.  Attitudinal and Community Influences on Participation in New Curbside Recycling Initiatives in Northern Ireland , 2007 .

[41]  Stephen Wu,et al.  The influence of social relationships on pro-environment behaviors , 2012 .

[42]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Norms and economic motivation in household recycling: Empirical evidence from Sweden ☆ , 2009 .

[43]  Karine Nyborg,et al.  An Economic Model of Moral Motivation , 2000 .

[44]  Ekin Birol,et al.  Investigating household preferences for kerbside recycling services in London: a choice experiment approach. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[45]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Two Rules of Identification for Structural Equation Models , 2009 .

[46]  Massimiliano Mazzanti,et al.  Waste generation, waste disposal and policy effectiveness Evidence on decoupling from the European Union , 2008 .

[47]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[48]  W. Greene,et al.  Recent Progress on Endogeneity in Choice Modeling , 2005 .

[49]  David I. Laibson,et al.  Costly Information Acquisition: Experimental Analysis of a Boundedly Rational Model , 2006 .

[50]  Ben White,et al.  Introduction to Environmental Economics , 1997 .

[51]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Incentive and informational properties of preference questions , 2007 .

[52]  Frank Lupi,et al.  Stated Choice Experiments with Complex Ecosystem Changes: The Effect of Information Formats on Estimated Variances and Choice Parameters , 2010 .

[53]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Hybrid choice models , 2014 .

[54]  C. Broadbent.  Hypothetical Bias, Consequentiality and Choice Experiments , 2012 .

[55]  Annegrete Bruvoll,et al.  Households’ recycling efforts , 2002 .

[56]  Richard M. Adams,et al.  An Economic Analysis of Household Recycling of Solid Wastes: The Case of Portland, Oregon , 1993 .

[57]  Jan Reichenbach,et al.  Status and prospects of pay-as-you-throw in Europe - a review of pilot research and implementation studies. , 2008, Waste management.

[58]  N. Hanley,et al.  Contingent valuation: Environmental polling or preference engine? , 2006 .

[59]  Ju-Chin Huang,et al.  Managing Municipal Solid Waste with Unit-Based Pricing: Policy Effects and Responsiveness to Pricing , 2011, Land Economics.

[60]  K. Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[61]  N. Hanley,et al.  The Effects of Experience on Preference Uncertainty: Theory and Empirics for Public and Quasi-Public Environmental Goods , 2013 .

[62]  C. Sims.  Implications of rational inattention , 2003 .

[63]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges , 2002 .

[64]  K. Nyborg.  I don’t want to hear about it: Rational ignorance among duty-oriented consumers☆ , 2011 .

[65]  Kjell Arne Brekke,et al.  Green Consumers and Public Policy: On Socially Contingent Moral Motivation , 2003 .

[66]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Estimation of a Model with Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes of a Single Latent Variable , 1975 .

[67]  K. Nyborg,et al.  The Cold Shiver of Not Giving Enough: On the Social Cost of Recycling Campaigns , 2004, Land Economics.