Through the portal: Effect anticipation in the central bottleneck.

Ample evidence suggests that motor actions are generated by mentally recollecting their sensory consequences, i.e., via effect anticipations. There is less evidence, though, on the capacity limitations that such effect anticipations suffer from. In the present paper we aim to overcome shortcomings of previous research on this issue by extending the set of empirical indicators of effect anticipations and by using trial-wise instead of block-wise manipulations. In four experiments using the locus of slack- and the effect propagation-logic, we found conclusive evidence for effect anticipation taking place in the capacity-limited central bottleneck. These findings extend previous research suggesting an overlap of a "response selection" process as assumed in traditional stage theory and effect anticipation processes as assumed in effect-based ideomotor models of action control.

[1]  R. Proctor,et al.  Response-effect compatibility with complex actions: The case of wheel rotations , 2015, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[2]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. , 1970, Psychological review.

[4]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[5]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  The locus of the emotional Stroop effect: a study with the PRP paradigm. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[6]  A. Kiesel,et al.  Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[7]  W. Kunde,et al.  Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[9]  R. Gaschler,et al.  Instructed Task Demands and Utilization of Action Effect Anticipation , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[10]  Markus Janczyk,et al.  Confidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules , 2013, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[11]  B. Hommel,et al.  Effect anticipation and action control. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Markus Janczyk,et al.  The benefit of no choice: goal-directed plans enhance perceptual processing , 2015, Psychological research.

[13]  Hannes Ruge,et al.  No anticipation without intention: response-effect compatibility in effect-based and stimulus-based actions. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[14]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Spatial Compatibility Effects With Tool Use , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[15]  V. Franz,et al.  Grasping for parsimony: Do some motor actions escape dorsal processing? , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .

[17]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  The role of effect grouping in free-choice response selection. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[18]  Hermann Lotze Medicinische Psychologie, oder, Physiologie der Seele , 2006 .

[19]  A. Welford THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .

[20]  James L. McClelland On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[21]  Arnaud Badets,et al.  Role of an ideomotor mechanism in number processing. , 2013, Experimental psychology.

[22]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Can mental rotation occur before the dual-task bottleneck? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  L. Karlin,et al.  Effects of Number of Alternatives on the Psychological Refractory Period , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Decision and Response in Dual-Task Interference , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition Exceptions to the PRP Effect ? A Comparison of Prepared and Unconditioned Reflexes , 2014 .

[26]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response- from goal-conflict in dual-task performance , 2014, Cognition.

[27]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Variable action effects: response control by context-specific effect anticipations , 2004, Psychological research.

[28]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Dorsal and Ventral Processing Under Dual-Task Conditions , 2007, Psychological science.

[29]  Jing Chen,et al.  Response–Effect Compatibility Defines the Natural Scrolling Direction , 2013, Hum. Factors.

[30]  Christina U. Pfeuffer,et al.  Perceiving by proxy: Effect-based action control with unperceivable effects , 2014, Cognition.

[31]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  E. Ruthruff,et al.  Does mental rotation require central mechanisms? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  A. Kiesel,et al.  Something in the way she moves—movement trajectories reveal dynamics of self-control , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[34]  U. Ansorge Spatial intention-response compatibility. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[35]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Ideo-Motor Action , 2016 .

[36]  M. Rieger Letters as visual action-effects in skilled typing. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[37]  W. Prinz,et al.  Relationships Between Perception and Action: Current Approaches , 1990 .

[38]  Andries F. Sanders,et al.  Elements of Human Performance: Reaction Processes and Attention in Human Skill , 1998 .

[39]  Peter E. Keller,et al.  Exogenous and endogenous response priming with auditory stimuli , 2006 .

[40]  Good vibrations? Vibrotactile self-stimulation reveals anticipation of body-related action effects in motor control , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  The locus of tool-transformation costs. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Pushing the rules: effects and aftereffects of deliberate rule violations , 2016, Psychological research.

[43]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Anticipated Action Effects Affect the Selection, Initiation, and Execution of Actions , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[44]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Markus Janczyk,et al.  Level 2 perspective taking entails two processes: evidence from PRP experiments. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  W. Kunde,et al.  Dissecting the response in response–effect compatibility , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  Joint response–effect compatibility , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  D. W. Massaro,et al.  An Information-Processing Analysis of Perception and Action , 1990 .

[49]  W. Kunde,et al.  Thinking with portals: Revisiting kinematic cues to intention , 2014, Cognition.

[50]  P. Dechent,et al.  Neural correlates of ideomotor effect anticipations , 2014, Neuroscience.

[51]  Richard Schweickert,et al.  A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a stroop task , 1978 .

[52]  H. Spencer The Principles of Psychology - Vol. I , 2016 .

[53]  R. Proctor,et al.  The Simon task with multi-component responses: two loci of response–effect compatibility , 2011, Psychological research.

[54]  A. Kiesel,et al.  Representing the hyphen in action-effect associations: automatic acquisition and bidirectional retrieval of action-effect intervals. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Does dorsal processing require central capacity? More evidence from the PRP paradigm , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  A. Sanders 20 Stage Analysis of Reaction Processes , 1980 .

[57]  Ann Reynolds,et al.  The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  W. Kunde,et al.  Temporal response-effect compatibility , 2003, Psychological research.

[59]  Torsten Schubert,et al.  Processing differences between simple and choice reactions affect bottleneck localization in overlapping tasks , 1999 .

[60]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[61]  R. Proctor,et al.  Testing boundary conditions of the ideomotor hypothesis using a delayed response task. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[62]  W. Kunde,et al.  Asymmetric transfer effects between cognitive and affective task disturbances , 2016, Cognition & emotion.

[63]  E. Smith,et al.  Choice reaction time: an analysis of the major theoretical positions. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.