Blockchain technology for viable circular digital supplychains: an integrated approach for evaluating the implementation barriers

PurposeBlockchain technology (BT) is creating a new standard for all business operations. It can assist businesses in handling the complexity of circular digital supply chain (DCM) management. Despite this optimistic view, several barriers hinder its implementation. In this regard, this study contributes to Industry 4.0, circular economy (CE), the viability with a critical emphasis on its potential ramifications and influence on the future agenda while using BT technology in the supply chain (SC). In addition, the research reduces the knowledge gap by investigating and ranking the key barriers to the deployment of BT in viable circular digital supply chains (VCDSCs) and studies their interdependencies and causal relationships. The purpose of this paper is to address these issues.Design/methodology/approachThe barriers to BT adoption in the VCDSC are identified through a thorough literature review and considering viability performance. These barriers are then classified using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method. Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) is then employed to examine the cause/effect, correlation, and connection among the 14 barriers selected barriers from the AHP classification to estimate each barrier's overall degree of impact over the others.FindingsThis paper identifies and analyzes the BT adoption barriers in the VCDSC as well as examines how the key barriers interact. As a result, according to the AHP/DEMATEL method, the most prominent influencing barriers to the BT implementation in the VCDSC are “Data transparency,” “Market competition,” “Missing infrastructure,” “Lack of standardization,” “Complex protocol,” “Lack of industry involvement,” “Financial constraints,” “Missing infrastructure,” “Data transparency” and “Interoperability.” The outcomes offer a potential path for identifying important barriers as well as insight into the implementation of BT in the SC while integrating different capabilities such as viability, sustainability and CE principles.Practical implicationsManagers and researchers will benefit from this research by gaining an understanding of the challenges that must be prioritized and examined for BT to be implemented successfully in the VCDSC.Originality/valueThe use and implementation of blockchain-enabled VCDSC continue to face challenges despite an increase in relevant practice and research. Despite the benefits of BT, managers struggle to apply such technology in the context of their company. In this respect, this paper uses an integrated AHP–DEMATEL for categorizing the BT barriers as well as the interrelationship between them. In this respect, this paper presents the BT barriers studied are those related to the use of BT in the SC while integrating different paradigms such as viability, digitalization and CE. While many studies look at the barriers to BT adoption; none of them has ever included the viable capability, which means the ability to “react agilely to positive changes, be resilient to absorb negative events and re-cover after disruptions and survive at long-term periods.” The study concludes with insightful comments based on the findings and suggestions for eradicating those obstacles and their associated effects.

[1]  Muhammad Sabbir Rahman,et al.  Examining the role of virtue ethics and big data in enhancing viable, sustainable, and digital supply chain performance , 2023, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[2]  Lincoln C. Wood,et al.  Understanding and predicting the determinants of blockchain technology adoption and SMEs' performance , 2022, The International Journal of Logistics Management.

[3]  Muhammad Sabbir Rahman,et al.  A multi-method study on the barriers of the blockchain technology application in the cold supply chains , 2022, Journal of Enterprise Information Management.

[4]  Amine Belhadi,et al.  Digital technologies and circular economy practices: vital enablers to support sustainable and resilient supply chain management in the post-COVID-19 era , 2022, The TQM Journal.

[5]  Khaironi Yatim Sharif,et al.  Novel Multi Security and Privacy Benchmarking Framework for Blockchain-Based IoT Healthcare Industry 4.0 Systems , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[6]  Abla Chaouni Benabdellah,et al.  Blockchain Technology for Supply Chain Resilience , 2022, 2022 14th International Colloquium of Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA).

[7]  R. P. Mohanty,et al.  Analysis of critical success factors for blockchain technology implementation in healthcare sector , 2022, Benchmarking: An International Journal.

[8]  Junbin Wang,et al.  Blockchain implementation for circular supply chain management: Evaluating critical success factors , 2022, Industrial Marketing Management.

[9]  K. Govindan Tunneling the barriers of blockchain technology in remanufacturing for achieving sustainable development goals: A circular manufacturing perspective , 2022, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[10]  G. Boella,et al.  Blockchain tools for socio-economic interactions in local communities , 2022, Policy and Society.

[11]  M. Ghobakhloo,et al.  Circularity effect in the viability of bio-based industrial symbiosis: Tackling extraordinary events in value chains , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[12]  C. Searcy,et al.  Alleviating the Impact of the Barriers to Circular Economy Adoption Through Blockchain: An Investigation Using an Integrated MCDM-based QFD With Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets , 2022, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[13]  G. Weber,et al.  Viable Supply Chain Network Design by considering Blockchain Technology and Cryptocurrency , 2021, Mathematical Problems in Engineering.

[14]  Abla Chaouni Benabdellah,et al.  A model integrating lean and green practices for viable, sustainable, and digital supply chain performance , 2021, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[15]  Nir Kshetri,et al.  Blockchain and sustainable supply chain management in developing countries , 2021, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[16]  S. Luthra,et al.  Managing disruptions and risks amidst COVID-19 outbreaks: role of blockchain technology in developing resilient food supply chains , 2021, Operations Management Research.

[17]  Mohamed Hanine,et al.  Analysis and Evaluation of Barriers Influencing Blockchain Implementation in Moroccan Sustainable Supply Chain Management: An Integrated IFAHP-DEMATEL Framework , 2021, Mathematics.

[18]  David J. Edwards,et al.  The Role of Blockchain Technology in Augmenting Supply Chain Resilience to Cybercrime , 2021, Buildings.

[19]  Ajay Kumar,et al.  The Mitigating Role of Blockchain-Enabled Supply Chains During the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2021, International Journal of Operations & Production Management.

[20]  Mauro Vivaldini,et al.  Blockchain connectivity inhibitors: weaknesses affecting supply chain interaction and resilience , 2021 .

[21]  Selwyn Piramuthu,et al.  Blockchain-Based Agile Supply Chain Framework with IoT , 2021, Information Systems Frontiers.

[22]  Amulya Gurtu,et al.  Supply Chain Risk Management: Literature Review , 2021, Risks.

[23]  J. Sarkis,et al.  Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers , 2021, International Journal of Production Economics.

[24]  Oliver Hinz,et al.  Blockchain , 2020, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[25]  Shahryar Ghorbani,et al.  Expert oriented approach for analyzing the blockchain adoption barriers in humanitarian supply chain , 2020 .

[26]  Surajit Bag,et al.  Key resources for industry 4.0 adoption and its effect on sustainable production and circular economy: An empirical study , 2020 .

[27]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective , 2020 .

[28]  M. Helms,et al.  Redesigning Supply Chains using Blockchain-Enabled Circular Economy and COVID-19 Experiences , 2020, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[29]  Surajit Bag,et al.  Barriers to adoption of blockchain technology in green supply chain management , 2020 .

[30]  P. Jiang,et al.  Blockchain-empowered sustainable manufacturing and product lifecycle management in industry 4.0: A survey , 2020 .

[31]  J. Garza‐Reyes,et al.  Supply chain management 4.0: a literature review and research framework , 2020, Benchmarking: An International Journal.

[32]  Davide Chiaroni,et al.  Addressing circular economy through design for X approaches: A systematic literature review , 2020, Comput. Ind..

[33]  Diego Vazquez-Brust,et al.  Evaluating the factors that influence blockchain adoption in the freight logistics industry , 2020, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[34]  Annika Tidström,et al.  Tokenizing coopetition in a blockchain for a transition to circular economy , 2020 .

[35]  Jacob Lohmer,et al.  Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study , 2020, International Journal of Production Economics.

[36]  Zhiyong Liu,et al.  A blockchain-based framework of cross-border e-commerce supply chain , 2020, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[37]  Luisa Varriale,et al.  Blockchain technology in supply chain management for sustainable performance: Evidence from the airport industry , 2020, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[38]  van Hoek Remko Research opportunities for a more resilient post-COVID-19 supply chain – closing the gap between research findings and industry practice , 2020 .

[39]  D. Ivanov Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, Ann. Oper. Res..

[40]  Surajit Bag,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and institutional theories for Industry 4.0 and digital supply chain , 2020 .

[41]  Abla Chaouni Benabdellah,et al.  Design for relevance concurrent engineering approach: integration of IATF 16949 requirements and design for X techniques , 2020 .

[42]  Anita Gehlot,et al.  Adoption of blockchain technology in various realms: Opportunities and challenges , 2020, Secur. Priv..

[43]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Viability of intertwined supply networks: extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[44]  Andreas Norrman,et al.  A Framework for Exploring Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management , 2020 .

[45]  Jens J. Hunhevicz,et al.  Do you need a blockchain in construction? Use case categories and decision framework for DLT design options , 2020, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[46]  Cihat Öztürk,et al.  Barriers to implementation of blockchain into supply chain management using an integrated multi-criteria decision-making method: a numerical example , 2020, Soft Computing.

[47]  Volodymyr Babich,et al.  Distributed Ledgers and Operations: What Operations Management Researchers Should Know About Blockchain Technology , 2018 .

[48]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Blockchain technology for enhancing swift-trust, collaboration and resilience within a humanitarian supply chain setting , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[49]  Eric W.T. Ngai,et al.  Decision-making techniques in supplier selection: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead , 2020, Expert Syst. Appl..

[50]  M. Sodhi,et al.  Blockchain for Supply Chain Traceability: Business Requirements and Critical Success Factors , 2020, Production and Operations Management.

[51]  Teresa Olivares,et al.  The adoption of Internet of Things in a Circular Supply Chain framework for the recovery of WEEE: The case of Lithium-ion electric vehicle battery packs. , 2019, Waste management.

[52]  Damian Hine,et al.  An Ontology-based Bayesian network modelling for supply chain risk propagation , 2019, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[53]  Santosh B. Rane,et al.  Re-designing the business organization using disruptive innovations based on blockchain-IoT integrated architecture for improving agility in future Industry 4.0 , 2019 .

[54]  Ting Qu,et al.  Circular supply chain management: A definition and structured literature review , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[55]  Nikolaos Trichakis,et al.  On the Financing Benefits of Supply Chain Transparency and Blockchain Adoption , 2019, Manag. Sci..

[56]  Sachin S. Kamble,et al.  Modeling the internet of things adoption barriers in food retail supply chains , 2019, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[57]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis , 2019, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[58]  P. Beynon-Davies,et al.  Understanding blockchain technology for future supply chains: a systematic literature review and research agenda , 2019, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.

[59]  Hokey Min,et al.  Blockchain technology for enhancing supply chain resilience , 2019, Business Horizons.

[60]  Surajit Bag,et al.  Industry 4.0 and supply chain sustainability: framework and future research directions , 2018, Benchmarking: An International Journal.

[61]  A. Tiwari,et al.  Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends , 2018, Energies.

[62]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[63]  Horst Treiblmaier,et al.  The Impact of the Blockchain on the Supply Chain: A Theory-Based Research Framework and a Call for Action , 2018, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.

[64]  O. Fisscher,et al.  CSR perception as a signpost for circular economy , 2018 .

[65]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Digital Supply Chain: Literature review and a proposed framework for future research , 2018, Comput. Ind..

[66]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Barriers to effective circular supply chain management in a developing country context , 2018 .

[67]  Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo,et al.  Blockchain: A Panacea for Healthcare Cloud-Based Data Security and Privacy? , 2018, IEEE Cloud Computing.

[68]  Dries Haeseldonckx,et al.  On the evolution of “CLEANER PRODUCTION” as a concept and a practice , 2018 .

[69]  Ghosh Debabrata,et al.  A Framework for Implementing Blockchain Technologies to Improve Supply Chain Performance , 2018 .

[70]  David Swanson,et al.  The Supply Chain Has No Clothes: Technology Adoption of Blockchain for Supply Chain Transparency , 2018 .

[71]  Nasser Mozayani,et al.  A socially-based distributed self-organizing algorithm for holonic multi-agent systems: Case study in a task environment , 2017, Cognitive Systems Research.

[72]  D. Simchi-Levi,et al.  Increasing Supply Chain Robustness through Process Flexibility and Inventory , 2017, Production and Operations Management.

[73]  E. Hultink,et al.  The Circular Economy - A New Sustainability Paradigm? , 2017 .

[74]  Kathleen B. Aviso,et al.  Analyzing barriers to implementing industrial symbiosis networks using DEMATEL , 2016 .

[75]  Dinesh Kumar,et al.  A combined approach using AHP and DEMATEL for evaluating success factors in implementation of green supply chain management in Indian manufacturing industries , 2016 .

[76]  Md Zahangir Alom,et al.  Night mode prohibitory traffic signs detection , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Informatics, Electronics and Vision (ICIEV).

[77]  Virgilio Cruz-Machado,et al.  A decision-making model for Lean, Agile, Resilient and Green supply chain management , 2012 .

[78]  Ming-Lang Tseng,et al.  Green supply chain management with linguistic preferences and incomplete information , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[79]  Jörgen Sandberg,et al.  Generating Research Questions Through Problematization , 2011 .

[80]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? , 2011 .

[81]  Tiaojun Xiao,et al.  Price and service competition of supply chains with risk-averse retailers under demand uncertainty , 2008 .

[82]  T. Saaty Decision making — the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP) , 2004 .

[83]  Anthony Mills,et al.  A systematic approach to risk management for construction , 2001 .

[84]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[85]  Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour,et al.  Risk management of supply chains in the digital transformation era: contribution and challenges of blockchain technology , 2023, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[86]  Sirwan Saber Abdullah,et al.  A Systematic Literature Review of Blockchain Technology , 2022, Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol..

[87]  K. Mathiyazhagan,et al.  Critical success factors for implementing blockchain­based circular supply chain , 2022 .

[88]  R. Cheung,et al.  A survey of breakthrough in blockchain technology: Adoptions, applications, challenges and future research , 2021, Comput. Commun..

[89]  Ming-Lang Tseng,et al.  A literature review of blockchain technology applications in supply chains: A comprehensive analysis of themes, methodologies and industries , 2021, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[90]  Anass Cherrafi,et al.  Sustainable and Resilience Improvement Through the Design for Circular Digital Supply Chain , 2021, APMS.

[91]  Abla Chaouni Benabdellah,et al.  Barriers of Blockchain Technology Adoption in Viable Digital Supply Chain , 2021, PLM.

[92]  Yaser Jararweh,et al.  A Survey on Blockchain for Information Systems Management and Security , 2021, Inf. Process. Manag..

[93]  Anass Cherrafi,et al.  Suppliers Selection Ontology for Viable Digital Supply Chain Performance , 2021, APMS.

[94]  Surya Prakash Singh,et al.  Blockchain critical success factors for sustainable supply chain , 2020 .

[95]  Anass Cherrafi,et al.  Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Supply Chain 4.0 Risks Management , 2020 .

[96]  F. Sunmola,et al.  Blockchain Characteristics for Sustainable Supply Chain Visibility , 2020 .

[97]  Hassan Mina,et al.  An Integrated Hybrid Approach for Circular supplier selection and Closed loop Supply Chain Network Design under Uncertainty , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[98]  R. Monfared,et al.  Blockchain ready manufacturing supply chain using distributed ledger , 2016 .