Higher magnitude cash payments improve research follow-up rates without increasing drug use or perceived coercion.

[1]  D. Marlowe,et al.  Do research payments precipitate drug use or coerce participation? , 2005, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[2]  H. Jones,et al.  Cash value of voucher reinforcers in pregnant drug-dependent women. , 2005, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[3]  K. Meyers,et al.  What does it take to retain substance-abusing adolescents in research protocols? Delineation of effort required, strategies undertaken, costs incurred, and 6-month post-treatment differences by retention difficulty. , 2003, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[4]  R. Dwyer,et al.  For love or money? An exploratory study of why injecting drug users participate in research. , 2001, Addiction.

[5]  J. Dallery,et al.  Voucher-based reinforcement of opiate plus cocaine abstinence in treatment-resistant methadone patients: effects of reinforcer magnitude. , 2001, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[6]  R. Hubbard,et al.  COMMENT ON “NONRESPONSE AND SELECTION BIAS IN TREATMENT FOLLOW-UP STUDIES” , 2001, Substance use & misuse.

[7]  M. Reilly,et al.  Impulsivity and voucher versus money preference in polydrug-dependent participants enrolled in a contingency-management-based substance abuse treatment program. , 2000, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[8]  Brian Knutson,et al.  FMRI Visualization of Brain Activity during a Monetary Incentive Delay Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[9]  S. Higgins,et al.  A within-subject comparison of three different schedules of reinforcement of drug abstinence using cigarette smoking as an exemplar. , 2000, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[10]  D. Gerstein,et al.  Nonresponse and Selection Bias in Treatment Follow-up Studies , 2000, Substance use & misuse.

[11]  C. Grady,et al.  What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  K. Silverman,et al.  Motivating behavior change among illicit-drug abusers: Research on contingency management interventions. , 1999 .

[13]  K. Preston,et al.  Efficacy and versatility of voucher-based reinforcement in drug abuse treatment. , 1999 .

[14]  G. McGee Subject to Payment , 1997 .

[15]  G. McGee A piece of my mind. Subject to payment? , 1997, JAMA.

[16]  R. Rosenheck Disability payments and chemical dependence: conflicting values and uncertain effects. , 1997, Psychiatric services.

[17]  D. Shern,et al.  Minimizing attrition in longitudinal studies of special populations: An integrated management approach , 1996 .

[18]  W. Compton,et al.  Achieving a 96.6 percent follow-up rate in a longitudinal study of drug abusers. , 1996, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[19]  G. Badger,et al.  Preferences for clinic privileges, retail items and social activities in an outpatient buprenorphine treatment program. , 1996, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[20]  T. Eckman,et al.  Disability income, cocaine use, and repeated hospitalization among schizophrenic cocaine abusers--a government-sponsored revolving door? , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  D. Desmond,et al.  Obtaining follow-up interviews for treatment evaluation. , 1995, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[22]  J. Schmitz,et al.  A menu of potential reinforcers in a methadone maintenance program. , 1994, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[23]  J. Monahan,et al.  Two scales for measuring patients' perceptions for coercion during mental hospital admission. , 1993, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[24]  D. Metzger,et al.  The Fifth Edition of the Addiction Severity Index. , 1992, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[25]  T. Jacob,et al.  Experimental drinking procedures in the study of alcoholics and their families: a consideration of ethical issues. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[26]  G. Koocher Questionable methods in alcoholism research. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[27]  William B. Hansen,et al.  Attrition in Substance Abuse Prevention Research , 1990 .

[28]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[29]  M. Stitzer,et al.  Oral methadone self‐administration: Effects of dose and alternative reinforcers , 1983, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[30]  R. Macklin,et al.  'Due' and 'Undue' Inducements: On Pasing Money to Research Subjects , 1981 .

[31]  Walters Le The use of medical records for research at Georgetown University: final report of the ad hoc committee. , 1981 .

[32]  David J. Armor,et al.  The course of alcoholism : four years after treatment , 1980 .

[33]  R. N. Bale The validity and reliability of self-reported data from heroin addicts: mailed questionnaires compared with face-to-face interviews. , 1979, The International journal of the addictions.

[34]  W. Hargreaves,et al.  Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. , 1979, Evaluation and program planning.

[35]  D. Kandel Longitudinal research on drug use: Empirical findings and methodological issues , 1978 .

[36]  Had,et al.  DISABILITY INCOME , COCAINE USE , AND REPEATED HOSPITALIZATION AMONG SCHIZOPHRENIC COCAINE ABUSERS A Government-Sponsored Revolving Door ? , 2022 .