Two years' experience with Web-based teleconsulting in dermatology

A non-commercial teledermatology network based on store-and-forward operation was established in April 2002. The aim was to create an easy-to-use platform for teleconsultation services, where physicians could seek diagnostic advice in dermatology from a pool of expert consultants and where they could present and discuss challenging dermatology cases with special emphasis on diagnosis and therapy. An online moderated discussion forum was added in October 2003. During the first two years, 348 health-care professionals from 45 countries registered to use the Website. A total of 783 requests for consultations were answered; 285 requests concerned pigmented skin lesions, 440 requests were from the whole range of clinical dermatology and 58 requests were about non-melanoma skin cancer. Of a total of 133 requests analysed, 80 (60%) were answered within one day, 47 (35%) within one week, five (4%) within two weeks and one (1%) consultation was answered in more than two weeks. Our experience with a discretionary, non-commercial, multilingual Website for open-access teleconsulting in dermatology appears to be successful. The Website represents an example of user-generated content, together with active interaction between users, who can present and discuss cases with remote colleagues.

[1]  D. Eedy,et al.  A comparison of real‐time and store‐and‐forward teledermatology: a cost–benefit study , 2000, The British journal of dermatology.

[2]  M Rademaker,et al.  Patient cost-benefits of realtime teledermatology-a comparison of data from Northern Ireland and New Zealand , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[3]  L. Machet.  [Multicentre randomised control trial comparing real time teledermatology with conventional outpatient dermatological care: societal cost-benefit analysis]. , 2002, Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie.

[4]  L. W. Chao,et al.  Evaluation of an Internet-based teledermatology system , 2003, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[5]  D. Eedy,et al.  Effect of camera performance on diagnostic accuracy: preliminary results from the Northern Ireland arms of the UK Multicentre Teledermatology Trial , 1997, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[6]  I. Mccoll.  Dermatology education on the Web , 2003, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[7]  Griffiths,et al.  Comparison of teleconsultations and face‐to‐face consultations: preliminary results of a United Kingdom multicentre teledermatology study , 1998, The British journal of dermatology.

[8]  Lansing G. Ellsworth,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and image quality using a digital camera for teledermatology. , 1999, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[9]  Ian Bowns,et al.  Patient satisfaction with teledermatology: quantitative and qualitative results from a randomized controlled trial , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[10]  P. Schmid‐Grendelmeier,et al.  Teledermatology as a new tool in sub-saharan Africa: an experience from Tanzania. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[11]  P. Hufnagl,et al.  Teleconsultation in diagnostic pathology: experience from Iran and Germany with the use of two European telepathology servers , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[12]  B. Berman,et al.  Teledermatology and underserved populations. , 1997, Archives of dermatology.

[13]  D. Eedy,et al.  A randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical effectiveness of both realtime and store-and-forward teledermatology compared with conventional care , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[14]  P Jacklin,et al.  A randomized controlled trial assessing the health economics of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional care: an urban versus rural perspective , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[15]  M. Du Moulin,et al.  The reliability of diagnosis using store-and-forward teledermatology , 2003, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[16]  M. G. Fleming,et al.  Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[17]  L. Drage,et al.  Assessment of the accuracy of low-cost store-and-forward teledermatology consultation. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[18]  M. Kitapci,et al.  Reliability of Web-based teledermatology consultations , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[19]  David J Goldberg.  Digital photography, confidentiality, and teledermatology. , 2004, Archives of dermatology.

[20]  H. Lamminen,et al.  A feasibility study of realtime teledermatology in Finland , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[21]  J W Burnett,et al.  Teledermatology and in-person examinations: a comparison of patient and physician perceptions and diagnostic agreement. , 1998, Archives of dermatology.

[22]  The challenges of following patients and assessing outcomes in teledermatology , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[23]  P. Swinfen,et al.  A review of the first year's experience with an automatic message-routing system for low-cost telemedicine , 2003, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[24]  K Collins,et al.  General practitioners' perceptions of store-and-forward teledermatology , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[25]  M Rademaker,et al.  A cost-minimization analysis of the societal costs of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional care: results from a randomized controlled trial in New Zealand , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[26]  N. Ellis,et al.  Patient Satisfaction with Store-and-Forward Teledermatology , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[27]  D. Eedy,et al.  Teledermatology: a review , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.

[28]  R. Wootton,et al.  Trial of low-cost teledermatology in primary care , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[29]  R Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Face-to-face diagnosis vs telediagnosis of pigmented skin tumors: a teledermoscopic study. , 1999, Archives of dermatology.

[30]  H Kerl,et al.  Concordance between telepathologic diagnosis and conventional histopathologic diagnosis: a multiobserver store-and-forward study on 20 skin specimens. , 2002, Archives of dermatology.

[31]  R. Wootton,et al.  A review of guidelines and standards for telemedicine , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.