Pilot study for compact microbeam radiation therapy using a carbon nanotube field emission micro-CT scanner.

PURPOSE Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is defined as the use of parallel, microplanar x-ray beams with an energy spectrum between 50 and 300 keV for cancer treatment and brain radiosurgery. Up until now, the possibilities of MRT have mainly been studied using synchrotron sources due to their high flux (100s Gy/s) and approximately parallel x-ray paths. The authors have proposed a compact x-ray based MRT system capable of delivering MRT dose distributions at a high dose rate. This system would employ carbon nanotube (CNT) field emission technology to create an x-ray source array that surrounds the target of irradiation. Using such a geometry, multiple collimators would shape the irradiation from this array into multiple microbeams that would then overlap or interlace in the target region. This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of attaining a high dose rate and parallel microbeam beams using such a system. METHODS The microbeam dose distribution was generated by our CNT micro-CT scanner (100 μm focal spot) and a custom-made microbeam collimator. An alignment assembly was fabricated and attached to the scanner in order to collimate and superimpose beams coming from different gantry positions. The MRT dose distribution was measured using two orthogonal radiochromic films embedded inside a cylindrical phantom. This target was irradiated with microbeams incident from 44 different gantry angles to simulate an array of x-ray sources as in the proposed compact CNT-based MRT system. Finally, phantom translation in a direction perpendicular to the microplanar beams was used to simulate the use of multiple parallel microbeams. RESULTS Microbeams delivered from 44 gantry angles were superimposed to form a single microbeam dose distribution in the phantom with a FWHM of 300 μm (calculated value was 290 μm). Also, during the multiple beam simulation, a peak to valley dose ratio of ~10 was found when the phantom translation distance was roughly 4x the beam width. The first prototype CNT-based x-ray tube dedicated to the development of compact MRT technology development was proposed and planned based on the preliminary experimental results presented here and the previous corresponding Monte Carlo simulations. CONCLUSIONS The authors have demonstrated the feasibility of creating microbeam dose distributions at a high dose rate using a proposed compact MRT system. The flexibility of CNT field emission x-ray sources could possibly bring compact and low cost MRT devices to the larger research community and assist in the translational research of this promising new approach to radiation therapy.

[1]  Guohua Cao,et al.  Design and characterization of a carbon-nanotube-based micro-focus x-ray tube for small animal imaging , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[2]  Otto Zhou,et al.  Carbon Nanotube-Based Field Emission X-ray Technology , 2010 .

[3]  M. Di Michiel,et al.  Physics study of microbeam radiation therapy with PSI-version of Monte Carlo code GEANT as a new computational tool. , 2000, Medical physics.

[4]  D N Slatkin,et al.  Subacute neuropathological effects of microplanar beams of x-rays from a synchrotron wiggler. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  X. Qian,et al.  Distributed source x-ray tube technology for tomosynthesis imaging , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Otto Zhou,et al.  Carbon nanotube based microfocus field emission x-ray source for microcomputed tomography , 2006 .

[7]  C. P. Baker,et al.  Histopathologic effect of high-energy-particle microbeams on the visual cortex of the mouse brain. , 1961, Radiation research.

[8]  C. De Wagter,et al.  The effects of incidence angle on film dosimetry and their consequences in IMRT dose verification. , 2012, Medical physics.

[9]  Guohua Cao,et al.  Prospective respiratory gated carbon nanotube micro computed tomography. , 2011, Academic radiology.

[10]  Yiheng Zhang,et al.  High resolution stationary digital breast tomosynthesis using distributed carbon nanotube x-ray source array. , 2012, Medical physics.

[11]  Erik Tryggestad,et al.  Small animal radiotherapy research platforms , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  A. Depaulis,et al.  High-Precision Radiosurgical Dose Delivery by Interlaced Microbeam Arrays of High-Flux Low-Energy Synchrotron X-Rays , 2010, PloS one.

[13]  I. Orion,et al.  Response of avian embryonic brain to spatially segmented x-ray microbeams. , 2001, Cellular and molecular biology.

[14]  E. W. Izaguirre,et al.  Development of a high resolution image guided microirradiator (microIGRT) , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[15]  Peter Kazanzides,et al.  High-resolution, small animal radiation research platform with x-ray tomographic guidance capabilities. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Otto Zhou,et al.  A carbon nanotube field emission multipixel x-ray array source for microradiotherapy application. , 2011, Applied physics letters.

[17]  Geraldine Le Duc,et al.  Increase of lifespan for glioma-bearing rats by using minibeam radiation therapy. , 2012, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[18]  P. Romanelli,et al.  Microbeam radiosurgery using synchrotron-generated submillimetric beams: a new tool for the treatment of brain disorders , 2011, Neurosurgical Review.

[19]  Sha X. Chang,et al.  A nanotube based electron microbeam cellular irradiator for radiobiology research. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[20]  Tetsuya Yuasa,et al.  Interlaced x-ray microplanar beams: a radiosurgery approach with clinical potential. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  C Ross Schmidtlein,et al.  Precise radiochromic film dosimetry using a flat-bed document scanner. , 2005, Medical physics.

[22]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest , 1995 .

[23]  David W. Archer,et al.  Microbeam radiation therapy , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[24]  A. Rosenfeld,et al.  Microbeam radiation therapy: a Monte Carlo study of the influence of the source, multislit collimator, and beam divergence on microbeams. , 2009, Medical physics.

[25]  P. Spanne,et al.  Microbeam radiation therapy. , 1992 .

[26]  N Suchowerska,et al.  Perturbation of radiotherapy beams by radiographic film: measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  R Peng,et al.  A dynamic micro-CT scanner based on a carbon nanotube field emission x-ray source , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Imants Svalbe,et al.  Tumor cell response to synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy differs markedly from cells in normal tissues. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  F. Dilmanian,et al.  Dose distribution from x-ray microbeam arrays applied to radiation therapy: An EGS4 Monte Carlo study. , 2005, Medical physics.

[30]  N. Suchowerska,et al.  Directional dependence in film dosimetry: radiographic and radiochromic film. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Guohua Cao,et al.  Prospective-gated cardiac micro-CT imaging of free-breathing mice using carbon nanotube field emission x-ray. , 2010, Medical physics.

[32]  I. Troprès,et al.  Irradiation of intracerebral 9L gliosarcoma by a single array of microplanar x-ray beams from a synchrotron: balance between curing and sparing , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  Alberto Bravin,et al.  Synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy for rat brain tumor palliation-influence of the microbeam width at constant valley dose. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  A. Bravin,et al.  Determination of dosimetrical quantities used in microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) with Monte Carlo simulations. , 2006, Medical physics.

[35]  Jonathan S. Maltz,et al.  Fixed gantry tomosynthesis system for radiation therapy image guidance based on a multiple source x-ray tube with carbon nanotube cathodes. , 2009 .

[36]  Hui-Ling Hsieh,et al.  Feasibility of using the micro CT imaging system as the conformal radiation therapy facility for small animals , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[37]  Sha X. Chang,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of a compact microbeam radiotherapy system based on carbon nanotube field emission technology. , 2012, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[38]  Laurel May Burk,et al.  Development of a Carbon Nanotube-Based Micro-CT and its Applications in Preclinical Research , 2013 .

[39]  H. Blattmann,et al.  New irradiation geometry for microbeam radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  H. Blattmann,et al.  Prospects for microbeam radiation therapy of brain tumours in children to reduce neurological sequelae , 2007, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[41]  Marianne Geiser,et al.  Neuropathology of ablation of rat gliosarcomas and contiguous brain tissues using a microplanar beam of synchrotron‐wiggler‐generated X rays , 1998, International journal of cancer.

[42]  Alberto Bravin,et al.  Weanling piglet cerebellum: a surrogate for tolerance to MRT (microbeam radiation therapy) in pediatric neuro-oncology , 2001, Optics + Photonics.

[43]  Alberto Bravin,et al.  Preferential effect of synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy on intracerebral 9L gliosarcoma vascular networks. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[44]  Frank Herbert Attix,et al.  Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry: Attix/Introduction , 2007 .