A method to characterize pattern density effects: chemical flare and develop loading

Many recent publications have highlighted pattern density effects as a problem in both electron-beam and optical lithography. These effects are manifested as a systematic variation in critical dimension as a function of position on the wafer. It is becoming an increasing problem as the pattern density and diminishing critical dimensions are needed for production nodes 32nm and beyond. One potential source of pattern density effects is acid volatility, where acid is presumed to redeposit during exposure or bake; here we refer to this effect as chemical flare. Another source of density effects is develop loading which refers to the impact of local depletion of developer in highly exposed regions. Both develop loading and chemical flare can cause deviations in feature size that may be difficult to correct for by adjustment of the exposure process. Here we describe a method that allows the detrimental effects of chemical flare and develop loading to be separately characterized. The method makes use of arrays of 248 nm exposure sites and a controlled develop process within a custom liquid flowcell; this combination enables a systematic study of these effects.

[1]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Developing loading effect on lithography I-line process , 2008, Lithography Asia.

[2]  Oscar Han,et al.  Improvement of develop loading effect in the FEP-171 process , 2004, Photomask Japan.

[3]  Vishal Garg,et al.  DUV laser lithography for photomask fabrication , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[4]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Solvent compatibility of poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based microfluidic devices. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  Erik Byers,et al.  Characterization of array CD uniformity with respect to pattern density in 193nm dry photolithography , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Tsukasa Yamazaki,et al.  Investigation of the development process for high-precision patterning , 2009, Photomask Japan.

[7]  Kuang-Jung Chen,et al.  A new long range proximity effect in chemically amplified photoresist processes: chemical flare , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[8]  N Tait,et al.  Fabrication of nanocolumns for liquid chromatography. , 1998, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  Zdenek Benes,et al.  Chemical flare long-range proximity effects in photomask manufacturing with chemically amplified resists , 2006, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[10]  Hideharu Kyoda,et al.  Improvement of CD controllability in developer process , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Zdenek Benes,et al.  Pattern density and process related CD corrections at 32nm node , 2007, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[12]  Daniel Courboin,et al.  High flow rate development: process optimization using megasonic immersion development (MID) , 2004, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[13]  Seong-Woon Choi,et al.  Quantitative analysis of develop loading effect and its application , 2004, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[14]  Yoshio Kawai,et al.  Phantom Exposure of Chemically Amplified Resist in KrF Excimer Laser Lithography , 1999 .

[15]  Masatoshi Oda,et al.  Phantom exposures of chemically amplified resists caused by acids generated in environmental air in synchrotron radiation lithography , 1999 .

[16]  Han-Ku Cho,et al.  The study of CD error in mid-local pattern area caused by develop loading effect , 2007, SPIE Photomask Technology.