Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers.

Recent improvements in genetic analysis and genotyping methods have resulted in a rapid expansion of the power of molecular markers to address ecological questions. Microsatellites have emerged as the most popular and versatile marker type for ecological applications. The rise of commercial services that can isolate microsatellites for new study species and genotype samples at reasonable prices presents ecologists with the unprecedented ability to employ genetic approaches without heavy investment in specialized equipment. Nevertheless, the lack of accessible, synthesized information on the practicalities and pitfalls of using genetic tools impedes ecologists' ability to make informed decisions on using molecular approaches and creates the risk that some will use microsatellites without understanding the steps needed to evaluate the quality of a genetic data set. The first goal of this synthesis is to provide an overview of the strengths and limitations of microsatellite markers and the risks, cost and time requirements of isolating and using microsatellites with the aid of commercial services. The second goal is to encourage the use and consistent reporting of thorough marker screening to ensure high quality data. To that end, we present a multistep screening process to evaluate candidate loci for inclusion in a genetic study that is broadly targeted to both novice and experienced geneticists alike.

[1]  A. Estoup,et al.  Microsatellite size homoplasy, SSCP, and population structure: a case study in the freshwater snail Bulinus truncatus. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[2]  Susan C. Alberts,et al.  Locus effects and sources of error in noninvasive genotyping , 2005 .

[3]  W. Amos,et al.  Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[4]  P. Jarne,et al.  TRACKING A GENETIC SIGNAL OF EXTINCTION‐RECOLONIZATION EVENTS IN A NEOTROPICAL TREE SPECIES: VOUACAPOUA AMERICANA AUBLET IN FRENCH GUIANA , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  F. Allendorf,et al.  HETEROZYGOSITY‐FITNESS CORRELATIONS IN RAINBOW TROUT: EFFECTS OF ALLOZYME LOCI OR ASSOCIATIVE OVERDOMINANCE? , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  David B. Goldstein,et al.  Microsatellites: Evolution and Applications , 1999 .

[7]  A. Hendry,et al.  ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE AND THE BALANCE BETWEEN SELECTION AND GENE FLOW: LAKE AND STREAM STICKLEBACK IN THE MISTY SYSTEM , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  F. Viard,et al.  HIGH MALE REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS OF HERMAPHRODITES IN THE ANDRODIOECIOUS PHILLYREA ANGUSTIFOLIA , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  G. Chambers,et al.  Microsatellites: consensus and controversy. , 2000, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology.

[10]  Daniel E. Ruzzante,et al.  A comparison of several measures of genetic distance and population structure with microsatellite data: bias and sampling variance , 1998 .

[11]  D. Westneat,et al.  Tests of spatial and temporal factors influencing extra‐pair paternity in red‐winged blackbirds , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[12]  R. Finkeldey,et al.  Comparative sequencing of a microsatellite locus reveals size homoplasy within and between european oak species (Quercus spp.) , 2004, Plant Molecular Biology Reporter.

[13]  P. Hedrick PERSPECTIVE: HIGHLY VARIABLE LOCI AND THEIR INTERPRETATION IN EVOLUTION AND CONSERVATION , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  T. Glenn,et al.  Isolating microsatellite DNA loci. , 2005, Methods in enzymology.

[15]  K. Bailey,et al.  Inverse relationship between FST and microsatellite polymorphism in the marine fish, walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma): implications for resolving weak population structure , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[16]  B. May,et al.  Evolution of a perfect simple sequence repeat locus in the context of its flanking sequence. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[17]  F. Cruz,et al.  Distribution and abundance of microsatellites in the genome of bivalves. , 2005, Gene.

[18]  G. Hewitt,et al.  Nuclear DNA analyses in genetic studies of populations: practice, problems and prospects , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[19]  G. Richard,et al.  Mini‐ and microsatellite expansions: the recombination connection , 2000, EMBO reports.

[20]  Christian Schlötterer,et al.  The evolution of molecular markers — just a matter of fashion? , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[21]  C. Strobeck,et al.  The molecular basis and evolutionary history of a microsatellite null allele in bears , 1995, Molecular ecology.

[22]  Michael J. Ford,et al.  Applications of selective neutrality tests to molecular ecology , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[23]  G. Carvalho,et al.  Phylogeography of the cyprinid Squalius aradensis and implications for conservation of the endemic freshwater fauna of southern Portugal , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[24]  C. Oosterhout,et al.  Micro-Checker: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data , 2004 .

[25]  F. Thrower,et al.  Inheritance of 12 microsatellite loci in Oncorhynchus mykiss , 1999 .

[26]  G. Singleton,et al.  Kin interactions and changing social structure during a population outbreak of feral house mice , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[27]  S. Kalinowski,et al.  Do polymorphic loci require large sample sizes to estimate genetic distances? , 2005, Heredity.

[28]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Microsatellites and kinship. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  F. Balloux,et al.  The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[30]  C. Schlötterer Evolutionary dynamics of microsatellite DNA , 2000, Chromosoma.

[31]  A. Kremer,et al.  Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[32]  N B Freimer,et al.  Homoplasy for size at microsatellite loci in humans and chimpanzees. , 1996, Genome research.

[33]  L. Ranum,et al.  Dominantly inherited, non-coding microsatellite expansion disorders. , 2002, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[34]  E. Danchin,et al.  High similarity between flanking regions of different microsatellites detected within each of two species of Lepidoptera: Parnassius apollo and Euphydryas aurinia , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[35]  M. Valero,et al.  Short allele dominance as a source of heterozygote deficiency at microsatellite loci: experimental evidence at the dinucleotide locus Gv1CT in Gracilaria gracilis (Rhodophyta) , 1998 .

[36]  J. Webster,et al.  An insight into the genetic variation of Schistosoma japonicum in mainland China using DNA microsatellite markers , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[37]  G. Luikart,et al.  SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation , 2004 .

[38]  Christian Schlötterer,et al.  Allele excess at neutrally evolving microsatellites and the implications for tests of neutrality , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  A. Davison,et al.  Conservation genetics and population history of the threatened European mink Mustela lutreola, with an emphasis on the west European population , 2005, Molecular Ecology.

[40]  M. Dawson,et al.  Field preservation of marine invertebrate tissue for DNA analyses. , 1998, Molecular marine biology and biotechnology.

[41]  B. Goossens,et al.  Patterns of genetic diversity and migration in increasingly fragmented and declining orang‐utan (Pongo pygmaeus) populations from Sabah, Malaysia , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[42]  J. Jurka,et al.  Microsatellites in different eukaryotic genomes: survey and analysis. , 2000, Genome research.

[43]  EVIDENCE FOR A MONOPHYLETIC ORIGIN OF TRIPLOID CLONES OF THE AMAZON MOLLY, POECILIA FORMOSA , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  A. Wilson,et al.  SSCP is not so difficult: the application and utility of single‐stranded conformation polymorphism in evolutionary biology and molecular ecology , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[45]  P. Jarne,et al.  Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  J. Corander,et al.  Genetic changes associated to declining populations of Formica ants in fragmented forest landscape , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[47]  M. Slatkin,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THREE INDIRECT METHODS FOR ESTIMATING AVERAGE LEVELS OF GENE FLOW , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[48]  VIABILITY SELECTION AT THREE EARLY LIFE STAGES OF THE TROPICAL TREE, PLATYPODIUM ELEGANS (FABACEAE, PAPILIONOIDEAE) , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[49]  M. Adjeroud,et al.  Patterns of genetic variation do not correlate with geographical distance in the reef‐building coral Pocillopora meandrina in the South Pacific , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[50]  R. Petit,et al.  Standardizing for microsatellite length in comparisons of genetic diversity , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[51]  I. Tommerup,et al.  Non-Mendelian inheritance revealed in a genetic analysis of sexual progeny of Phytophthora cinnamomi with microsatellite markers. , 2002, Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B.

[52]  Bruce Rannala,et al.  Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. , 2003, Genetics.

[53]  CLINAL VARIATION AT MICROSATELLITE LOCI REVEALS HISTORICAL SECONDARY INTERGRADATION BETWEEN GLACIAL RACES OF COREGONUS ARTEDI (TELEOSTEI: COREGONINAE) , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[54]  B. May,et al.  Genetic variation among interconnected populations of Catostomus occidentalis: implications for distinguishing impacts of contaminants from biogeographical structuring , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[55]  Stephanie Manel,et al.  Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[56]  A. Casas,et al.  Genetic variation and evolution of Polaskia chichipe (Cactaceae) under domestication in the Tehuacán Valley, central Mexico , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[57]  J. Bossart,et al.  Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: Limitations, lessons and new directions. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[58]  P M Kappeler,et al.  Microsatellite analyses reveal fine‐scale genetic structure in grey mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus) , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[59]  I. Boyd,et al.  MALE REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY AND THE IMPORTANCE OF MATERNAL STATUS IN THE ANTARCTIC FUR SEAL ARCTOCEPHALUS GAZELLA , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[60]  P. Taberlet,et al.  How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[61]  Pierre Taberlet,et al.  Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics , 2003 .

[62]  A. Estoup,et al.  Variation of Microsatellite Size Homoplasy Across Electromorphs, Loci, and Populations in Three Invertebrate Species , 1998, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[63]  J. Slate,et al.  Nonamplifying alleles at microsatellite loci: a caution for parentage and population studies , 1995, Molecular ecology.

[64]  G. Wilkinson,et al.  Microsatellite variation among divergent populations of stalk-eyed flies, genus Cyrtodiopsis. , 2004, Genetical research.

[65]  R. Black,et al.  The Wahlund effect and the geographical scale of variation in the intertidal limpet Siphonaria sp. , 1984 .

[66]  Li Jin,et al.  Population structure, stepwise mutations, heterozygote deficiency and their implications in DNA forensics , 1995, Heredity.

[67]  M. Chapuisat,et al.  VARIABLE QUEEN NUMBER IN ANT COLONIES: NO IMPACT ON QUEEN TURNOVER, INBREEDING, AND POPULATION GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION IN THE ANT FORMICA SELYSI , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[68]  R. Fleischer,et al.  Vocal dialects, sex‐biased dispersal, and microsatellite population structure in the parrot Amazona auropalliata , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[69]  A. MØller,et al.  A wide‐range survey of cross‐species microsatellite amplification in birds , 1996, Molecular ecology.

[70]  F. Bonhomme,et al.  GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. , 1996 .

[71]  S. E. Taylor,et al.  A multilocus population genetic survey of the greater sage‐grouse across their range , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[72]  S. Bensch,et al.  Ten years of AFLP in ecology and evolution: why so few animals? , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[73]  O. Gaggiotti,et al.  A comparison of two indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow using microsatellite data , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[74]  G. Hewitt,et al.  470 million years of conservation of microsatellite loci among fish species , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[75]  François Rousset,et al.  GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetic software for exact tests and ecumenicism , 1995 .

[76]  L. Zane,et al.  Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[77]  M. Beaumont,et al.  Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[78]  R. Adams,et al.  The impact of microsatellite electromorph size homoplasy on multilocus population structure estimates in a tropical tree (Corythophora alta) and an anadromous fish (Morone saxatilis) , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[79]  C. Schlötterer,et al.  microsatellite analyser (MSA): a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets , 2003 .

[80]  R. Ennos,et al.  HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY MATING PATTERNS IN REMNANT POPULATIONS OF THE FOREST TREEFRAXINUS EXCELSIOR L. , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[81]  A. Storfer,et al.  Landscape genetics of the blotched tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum melanostictum) , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[82]  D. A. Brandt,et al.  Population genetic structure in migratory sandhill cranes and the role of Pleistocene glaciations , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[83]  R. Lewontin,et al.  Distribution of gene frequency as a test of the theory of the selective neutrality of polymorphisms. , 1973, Genetics.

[84]  R. Richards,et al.  Incidence and origin of "null" alleles in the (AC)n microsatellite markers. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[85]  P. Gupta,et al.  Linkage disequilibrium and association studies in higher plants: Present status and future prospects , 2005, Plant Molecular Biology.

[86]  J. Goudet FSTAT (Version 1.2): A Computer Program to Calculate F-Statistics , 1995 .

[87]  GENETIC VARIATION IN THE SPREAD OF DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA FROM A NONEQUILIBRIUM POPULATION , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[88]  L. Waits,et al.  Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[89]  F. Allendorf,et al.  CONCORDANCE OF GENETIC DIVERGENCE AMONG SOCKEYE SALMON POPULATIONS AT ALLOZYME, NUCLEAR DNA, AND MITOCHONDRIAL DNA MARKERS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[90]  T. C. Marshall,et al.  Statistical confidence for likelihood‐based paternity inference in natural populations , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[91]  B. Weir,et al.  Bayesian statistics in genetics: a guide for the uninitiated. , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[92]  F. Bonhomme,et al.  Genetix v. 3.0, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome et Populations, CNRS UPR 9060, Université Montpellier 2, Montpellier. , 1997 .

[93]  M Slatkin,et al.  An exact test for neutrality based on the Ewens sampling distribution. , 1994, Genetical research.

[94]  P. Boursot,et al.  Interpretation of variation across marker loci as evidence of selection. , 2001, Genetics.

[95]  S. Bensch,et al.  DOES LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM GENERATE HETEROZYGOSITY‐FITNESS CORRELATIONS IN GREAT REED WARBLERS? , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[96]  M. Cruzan GENETIC MARKERS IN PLANT EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY , 1998 .

[97]  E. Gosling,et al.  Genetic variability and phylogeography of the invasive zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas) , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[98]  M. Morgante,et al.  Cross-species amplification of soybean (Glycine max) simple sequence repeats (SSRs) within the genus and other legume genera: implications for the transferability of SSRs in plants. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[99]  A. Cockburn,et al.  Microsatellite evolution at two hypervariable loci revealed by extensive avian pedigrees. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[100]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Invasion genetics of the Eurasian spiny waterflea: evidence for bottlenecks and gene flow using microsatellites , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[101]  P. Hedrick A STANDARDIZED GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION MEASURE , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[102]  G. Luikart,et al.  Statistical analysis of microsatellite DNA data. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[103]  H. Ellegren Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[104]  J. F. Storz,et al.  Contrasting patterns of divergence in quantitative traits and neutral DNA markers: analysis of clinal variation , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[105]  P. Sunnucks,et al.  Efficient genetic markers for population biology. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[106]  M. Hellberg,et al.  Regionally isolated populations of an imperiled Caribbean coral, Acropora palmata , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[107]  B. Epperson Mutation at high rates reduces spatial structure within populations , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[108]  G. Vendramin,et al.  NUCLEAR MICROSATELLITES REVEAL CONTRASTING PATTERNS OF GENETIC STRUCTURE BETWEEN WESTERN AND SOUTHEASTERN EUROPEAN POPULATIONS OF THE COMMON ASH (FRAXINUS EXCELSIOR L.) , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[109]  Lynn Y. Huynh,et al.  Habitat barriers limit gene flow and illuminate historical events in a wide‐ranging carnivore, the American puma , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[110]  M. Arnegard,et al.  MULTIPLE CASES OF STRIKING GENETIC SIMILARITY BETWEEN ALTERNATE ELECTRIC FISH SIGNAL MORPHS IN SYMPATRY , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[111]  W. Powell,et al.  How much effort is required to isolate nuclear microsatellites from plants? , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[112]  E. Vargo,et al.  HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS OF COLONY AND POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE OF THE EASTERN SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE, RETICULITERMES FLAVIPES, USING TWO CLASSES OF MOLECULAR MARKERS , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[113]  S. Tishkoff,et al.  Global Patterns of Linkage Disequilibrium at the CD4 Locus and Modern Human Origins , 1996, Science.

[114]  B. Epperson Multilocus estimation of genetic structure within populations. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[115]  G. Luikart,et al.  Computer note. BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective size using allele frequency data , 1999 .

[116]  V. Buonaccorsi,et al.  Population structure of copper rockfish (Sebastes caurinus) reflects postglacial colonization and contemporary patterns of larval dispersal , 2002 .

[117]  P. Landry,et al.  Deriving evolutionary relationships among populations using microsatellites and (deltamu)(2): all loci are equal, but some are more equal than others... , 2002, Genetics.

[118]  M. P. Piggott,et al.  Remote collection of animal DNA and its applications in conservation management and understanding the population biology of rare and cryptic species , 2003 .

[119]  John C. Avise,et al.  Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution , 1993, Springer US.

[120]  C. Schlötterer,et al.  Distribution of dinucleotide microsatellites in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.

[121]  D. Balding,et al.  Handbook of statistical genetics , 2004 .

[122]  Moderately and Highly Polymorphic Microsatellites Provide Discordant Estimates of Population Divergence in Sockeye Salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka , 2004 .

[123]  E. Nielsen,et al.  Evidence of a hybrid‐zone in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in the Baltic and the Danish Belt Sea revealed by individual admixture analysis , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[124]  J. Bouvet,et al.  Genetic diversity and population structure of an insular tree, Santalum austrocaledonicum in New Caledonian archipelago , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[125]  R. Wayne,et al.  Empirical evaluation of preservation methods for faecal DNA , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[126]  F. Allendorf,et al.  Blackwell Publishing, Ltd. , 2003 .

[127]  G. Maes,et al.  GROWTH RATE CORRELATES TO INDIVIDUAL HETEROZYGOSITY IN THE EUROPEAN EEL, ANGUILLA ANGUILLA L. , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[128]  Denis Réale,et al.  How do misassigned paternities affect the estimation of heritability in the wild? , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[129]  P. Sunnucks,et al.  RANDOM LOSS OF X CHROMOSOME AT MALE DETERMINATION IN AN APHID, SITOBION NEAR FRAGARIAE, DETECTED USING AN X-LINKED POLYMORPHIC MICROSATELLITE MARKER , 1997 .

[130]  J. Altmann,et al.  Cross‐species amplification, non‐invasive genotyping, and non‐Mendelian inheritance of human STRPs in Savannah baboons , 2000, American journal of primatology.

[131]  H. Ellegren,et al.  Microsatellite evolution--a reciprocal study of repeat lengths at homologous loci in cattle and sheep. , 1997, Molecular biology and evolution.

[132]  B. Neff,et al.  MICROSATELLITE EVOLUTION IN VERTEBRATES: INFERENCE FROM AC DINUCLEOTIDE REPEATS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[133]  D. Gomez-Uchida,et al.  Microsatellite analyses of spatial genetic structure in darkblotched rockfish (Sebastes crameri): Is pooling samples safe? , 2005 .

[134]  F Rousset,et al.  Equilibrium values of measures of population subdivision for stepwise mutation processes. , 1996, Genetics.

[135]  J. Neigel,et al.  A COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES FOR ESTIMATINGGENE FLOW FROM GENETIC MARKERS1 , 1997 .

[136]  H. Ellegren,et al.  Low frequency of microsatellites in the avian genome. , 1997, Genome research.

[137]  B. Rannala,et al.  The Bayesian revolution in genetics , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[138]  J. Cornuet,et al.  Size homoplasy and mutational processes of interrupted microsatellites in two bee species, Apis mellifera and Bombus terrestris (Apidae). , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.

[139]  Roderick,et al.  Determining the source of individuals: multilocus genotyping in nonequilibrium population genetics. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[140]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE AND HIERARCHICAL GENETIC DIVERSITY IN THE BROOK CHARR, SALVELINUS FONTINALIS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[141]  Terry Burke,et al.  Environmental correlates of toad abundance and population genetic diversity , 2001 .

[142]  R. Toonen,et al.  Conservation implications of complex population structure: lessons from the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[143]  T. Glenn,et al.  Population genetics of the diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[144]  B. Oldroyd,et al.  THE AFRICANIZATION OF HONEYBEES (APIS MELLIFERA L.) OF THE YUCATAN: A STUDY OF A MASSIVE HYBRIDIZATION EVENT ACROSS TIME , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[145]  Bruce S. Weir,et al.  Genetic Data Analysis: Methods for Discrete Population Genetic Data. , 1991 .

[146]  DW J.A. Microsatellite variation in marine, freshwater and anadromous fishes compared with other animals , 2000 .

[147]  R. Hueter,et al.  Microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA analyses of the genetic structure of blacktip shark (Carcharhinus limbatus) nurseries in the northwestern Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean Sea , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[148]  N. Leterme,et al.  Microsatellite allele sizing: difference between automated capillary electrophoresis and manual technique. , 2001, BioTechniques.

[149]  SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION ANALYSIS OFFERS NEW INSIGHTS INTO GENE FLOW IN THE AUSTRALIAN BUSH RAT, RATTUS FUSCIPES , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[150]  M Slatkin,et al.  A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. , 1995, Genetics.

[151]  GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF POLYGYNY AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE IN AN INDIAN FRUIT BAT, CYNOPTERUS SPHINX. I. INBREEDING, OUTBREEDING, AND POPULATION SUBDIVISION , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[152]  E. Thompson,et al.  Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. , 1992, Biometrics.

[153]  J. Avise,et al.  Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis , 2004, Heredity.

[154]  HYBRIDIZATION AND POPULATION GENETICS OF TWO MACAQUE SPECIES IN SULAWESI, INDONESIA , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[155]  F. Balloux EASYPOP (version 1.7): a computer program for population genetics simulations. , 2001, The Journal of heredity.

[156]  E. Nevo,et al.  Microsatellites: genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[157]  Arnaud Estoup,et al.  Homoplasy and mutation model at microsatellite loci and their consequences for population genetics analysis , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[158]  S. Kalinowski,et al.  How many alleles per locus should be used to estimate genetic distances? , 2002, Heredity.

[159]  M. Nei Molecular Evolutionary Genetics , 1987 .

[160]  R. Crozier,et al.  POPULATION AND COLONY GENETIC STRUCTURE OF THE PRIMITIVE TERMITE MASTOTERMES DARWINIENSIS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.