Comparison of theoretical and experimental diesel and DME injection spray characteristics

Abstract The objective of this research was to compare the spray penetration from a common rail injector using equations proposed in the literature to experimentally attained results, using diesel and dimethyl ether (DME) as fuels. The injection occurred in a chamber pressurized with nitrogen at injection pressures of 400 bar and 600 bar into ambient pressures of 12 bar, 16 bar and 18 bar. High speed images were recorded at 10 000 fps. Analysis of the results indicated that the models proposed by Wakuri et al. and Sazhin et al., at the same conditions, provided penetration values that were closest to the experimental values. In terms of the two models, it was found that the predicted depth of penetration of diesel fuel was, in general, not very well predicted. The DME showed close correlation with the both models at higher injection pressure and higher chamber pressure. The model proposed by Sazhin appears to produce somewhat better results for DME at the conditions reported in this research. The SMD values of DME were noted to be higher than those of diesel for the same conditions.

[1]  Choongsik Bae,et al.  Dimethyl ether (DME) spray characteristics in a common-rail fuel injection system , 2003 .

[2]  Seung Hwan Bang,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Spray and Combustion Characteristics of Dimethyl Ether in a Common-Rail Diesel Engine , 2007 .

[3]  Sungwook Park,et al.  Atomization Characteristics of Dimethyl Ether Fuel as an Alternative Fuel Injected through a Common-Rail Injection System , 2006 .

[4]  A. R. Binesh,et al.  Investigation of fuel spray atomization in a DI heavy-duty diesel engine and comparison of various spray breakup models , 2009 .

[5]  J. C. Dent A basis for the comparison of various experimental methods for studying spray penetration. , 1971 .

[6]  Morgan Heikal,et al.  A model for fuel spray penetration , 2001 .

[7]  Hyun Kyu Suh,et al.  Experimental and analytical study on the spray characteristics of dimethyl ether (DME) and diesel fuels within a common-rail injection system in a diesel engine , 2008 .

[8]  Hyunsu Kim,et al.  A Comparison of Effects of Ambient Pressure on the Atomization Performance of Soybean Oil Methyl Ester and Dimethyl Ether Sprays , 2010 .

[9]  Su Han Park,et al.  Investigation on the fuel spray and emission reduction characteristics for dimethyl ether (DME) fuel , 2011 .

[10]  Yoshio Sato,et al.  The Performance of a Diesel Engine for Light Duty Truck Using a Jerk Type In-Line DME Injection System , 2004 .

[11]  Su Han Park,et al.  An Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Atomization Characteristics of Biodiesel, Dimethyl Ether, and Biodiesel−Ethanol Blended Fuel , 2008 .

[12]  Chao He,et al.  Spray properties of alternative fuels: A comparative analysis of biodiesel and diesel , 2008 .

[13]  Reijiro Tsuneya,et al.  Studies on the Penetration of Fuel Spray in a Diesel Engine , 1959 .