Investigation of ionic polymer cathode binders for microbial fuel cells

Microbial fuel cell (MFC) air cathodes examined here were made using poly(phenylsulfone) (Radel®) binders sulfonated to various ion exchange capacities (IECs). We examined the effect of increasing the IEC of poly(phenylsulfone) Radel binders from 0 to 2.54 meq/g on cathode performance using linear sweep voltammetry (LSV), impedance, and single chamber air-cathode MFC tests. Unsulfonated Radel, which is a non-ionic, hydrophobic polymer, showed the highest current in LSV tests and the lowest charge transfer resistance. Increasing the binder IEC resulted in a decreased current response in LSV tests and an increased charge transfer resistance from 8 to 23 � . It is proposed that the presence of sulfonate groups in the cathode binder impeded the oxygen reduction activity of the cathodes by adsorption of the sulfonate to catalytic sites and by impeding proton diffusion to the catalyst surface. The unsulfonated Radel binder produced the most stable performance, and eventually the highest power density, in MFCs operated over 20 cycles (55 days). These results suggest that the use of a non-ionic binder is advantageous in an MFC cathode to facilitate charge transfer and stable performance in the neutral pH conditions found in MFCs.

[1]  Hong Liu,et al.  Increased power generation in a continuous flow MFC with advective flow through the porous anode and reduced electrode spacing. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Bruce E. Logan,et al.  Microbial Fuel Cells , 2006 .

[3]  D. Fritsch,et al.  Proton-conductive membranes of sulfonated Polyphenylsulfone , 2002 .

[4]  V. Ramani,et al.  Effect of cathode binder IEC on kinetic and transport losses in all-SPEEK MEAs , 2008 .

[5]  Hong Liu,et al.  Power densities using different cathode catalysts (Pt and CoTMPP) and polymer binders (nafion and PTFE) in single chamber microbial fuel cells. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  B. Logan,et al.  Graphite fiber brush anodes for increased power production in air-cathode microbial fuel cells. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Stefano Freguia,et al.  Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Bruce E. Logan,et al.  Increased performance of single-chamber microbial fuel cells using an improved cathode structure , 2006 .

[9]  Bryan S. Pivovar,et al.  Structure–property–performance relationships of sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone)s as a polymer electrolyte for fuel cell applications , 2006 .

[10]  R. Slade,et al.  Investigations of conductivity in FEP-based radiation-grafted alkaline anion-exchange membranes , 2005 .

[11]  B. Pivovar,et al.  The Chemical and Structural Nature of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Properties , 2005 .

[12]  M. Hickner,et al.  Alternative polymer systems for proton exchange membranes (PEMs). , 2004, Chemical reviews.

[13]  David M. Bagley,et al.  Experimental Determination of Energy Content of Unknown Organics in Municipal Wastewater Streams , 2004 .

[14]  M. Hickner,et al.  Poly(Arylene Ether Sulfone) Copolymers and Related Systems from Disulfonated Monomer Building Blocks: Synthesis, Characterization, and Performance – A Topical Review , 2005 .