An Ecological Alternative to Snodgrass & Vanderwart: 360 High Quality Colour Images with Norms for Seven Psycholinguistic Variables
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Manila Vannucci,et al. A New Standardized Set of Ecological Pictures for Experimental and Clinical Research on Visual Object Processing , 2004, Cortex.
[2] Jon Andoni Duñabeitia,et al. A standardized set of 260 pictures for Modern Greek: Norms for name agreement, age of acquisition, and visual complexity , 2009, Behavior research methods.
[3] Tim M. Gale,et al. When is Category Specific in Alzheimer's Disease? , 2005, Cortex.
[4] Fernando Cuetos,et al. Objective age of acquisition norms for a set of 328 words in Spanish , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[5] Moreno-Martínez Fj,et al. Enfermedad de Alzheimer, deterioro categorial y variables relevantes en la denominación de objetos , 2007 .
[6] Charles Kemp,et al. How to Grow a Mind: Statistics, Structure, and Abstraction , 2011, Science.
[7] Alfonso Caramazza,et al. The Selective Sparing of Body Part Knowledge: A Case Study , 1998 .
[8] J. Tenenbaum,et al. Probabilistic models of cognition: exploring representations and inductive biases , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[9] Eero P. Simoncelli,et al. Cardinal rules: Visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.
[10] F. Moreno-Martínez. Size matters: A study on naming and size knowledge in dementia of the Alzheimer type , 2010, Neurocase.
[11] M. Brodeur,et al. The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a New Set of 480 Normative Photos of Objects to Be Used as Visual Stimuli in Cognitive Research , 2010, PloS one.
[12] Elaine Funnell,et al. Categories of knowledge? unfamiliar aspects of living and nonliving things , 1992 .
[13] Lorella Lotto,et al. Naming times and standardized norms for the italian PD/DPSS set of 266 pictures: Direct comparisons with American, English, French, and Spanish published databases , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[14] Bradford Z. Mahon,et al. The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from category-specific semantic deficits , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[15] M. Silveri,et al. Naming in Patients With Alzheimer’s Disease: Influence of Age of Acquisition and Categorical Effects , 2002, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.
[16] H. Chertkow,et al. The semantic category effect increases with worsening anomia in Alzheimer’s type dementia , 2003, Brain and Language.
[17] A. Caramazza,et al. Domain-Specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[18] George S. Cree,et al. Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits , 2001 .
[19] L. Buxbaum,et al. Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects , 2002, Brain and Language.
[20] Angel Fernandez,et al. A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized for Spanish: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity , 1996 .
[21] J. Hodges,et al. The Cambridge Semantic Memory Test Battery: Detection of semantic deficits in semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease , 2010, Neurocase.
[22] D. Salmon,et al. Semantic memory impairment in Alzheimer's disease: Failure of access or degraded knowledge? , 1992, Neuropsychologia.
[23] Keith R. Laws,et al. “Illusions of Normality”: a Methodological Critique of Category-Specific Naming , 2005, Cortex.
[24] G. Humphreys,et al. Category specificity in mind and brain? , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[25] Eero P. Simoncelli,et al. Metamers of the ventral stream , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.
[26] E. Rosch,et al. Structural bases of typicality effects. , 1976 .
[27] D. Westwood,et al. Manipulability and living/non-living category effects on object identification , 2005, Brain and Cognition.
[28] Randall J. Frank,et al. Explaining category-related effects in the retrieval of conceptual and lexical knowledge for concrete entities: operationalization and analysis of factors , 1997, Neuropsychologia.
[29] P. R. Montoro,et al. Longitudinal patterns of fluency impairment in dementia: The role of domain and “nuisance variables” , 2010 .
[30] T. Shallice,et al. Category specific semantic impairments. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[31] P. Fletcher,et al. DO SEMANTIC CATEGORIES ACTIVATE DISTINCT CORTICAL REGIONS? EVIDENCE FOR A DISTRIBUTED NEURAL SEMANTIC SYSTEM , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[32] H. Kucera,et al. Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .
[33] J. G. Snodgrass,et al. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.
[34] Antonio Torralba,et al. How many pixels make an image? , 2009, Visual Neuroscience.
[35] J. Tanaka,et al. Color diagnosticity in object recognition , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.
[36] E. Warrington,et al. Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[37] Erminio Capitani,et al. Living musical instruments and inanimate body parts? , 2001, Neuropsychologia.
[38] K. Laws,et al. A set of high quality colour images with Spanish norms for seven relevant psycholinguistic variables: The Nombela naming test , 2011, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.
[39] T. Gale,et al. Visual processing in Alzheimer's disease: Surface detail and colour fail to aid object identification , 2009, Neuropsychologia.
[40] Herminia Peraita Adrados,et al. Un nuevo conjunto de ítems para la evaluación de la disociación ser vivo / ser no vivo con normas obtenidas de ancianos sanos españoles , 2007 .
[41] C. Thompson,et al. Effect of typicality on online category verification of animate category exemplars in aphasia , 2003, Brain and Language.
[42] A. Caramazza,et al. WHAT ARE THE FACTS OF SEMANTIC CATEGORY-SPECIFIC DEFICITS? A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE CLINICAL EVIDENCE , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[43] M. Laiacona,et al. Dissociazioni semantiche intercategoriali: descrizione di una batteria standardizzata e dati normativi , 1993 .
[44] B. Rossion,et al. Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's Object Pictorial Set: The Role of Surface Detail in Basic-Level Object Recognition , 2004, Perception.
[45] E. Warrington,et al. THE SELECTIVE IMPAIRMENT OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLE KNOWLEDGE:AMULTIPLE PROCESSING CHANNELS ACCOUNT OF FINE-GRAIN CATEGORY SPECIFICITY , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[46] M. A. Pérez,et al. Normas españolas de 290 nuevos dibujos:acuerdo en la denominación, concordancia de la imagen, familiaridad, complejidad visual y variabilidad de la imagen , 2003 .
[47] S. Schwartz. Are life episodes replayed during dreaming? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[48] Catriona M. Morrison,et al. Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[49] Dana Samson,et al. A CASE OF IMPAIRED KNOWLEDGE FOR FRUIT AND VEGETABLES , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[50] Kenneth Gilhooly,et al. Age-of-acquisition effects in lexical and episodic memory tasks , 1979 .
[51] Bradford Z. Mahon,et al. CONSTRAINING QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ORGANISATION AND REPRESENTATION OF CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[52] A Wingfield,et al. Response Latencies in Naming Objects , 1965, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[53] A. Ellis,et al. Age of Acquisition Affects Object Recognition and Naming in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease , 2006, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.
[54] E. Rosch,et al. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.
[55] Irene V Blair,et al. Using Internet search engines to estimate word frequency , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[56] K. Laws,et al. No category specificity in Alzheimer's disease: a normal aging effect. , 2008, Neuropsychology.
[57] K. Laws,et al. An attenuation of the ‘normal’ category effect in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: A review and bootstrap analysis , 2007, Brain and Cognition.
[58] M Besson,et al. The Snodgrass and Vanderwart Set Revisited: Norms for Object Manipulability and for Pictorial Ambiguity of Objects, Chimeric Objects, and Nonobjects , 2003, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.
[59] D. John Done and Tim M. Gale,et al. Attribute Verification in Dementia of Alzheimer Type: Evidence for the Preservation of Distributed Concept Knowledge , 1997 .
[60] G W Humphreys,et al. The Effects of Surface Detail on Object Categorization and Naming , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[61] M. D’Esposito,et al. Semantic memory in Alzheimer's disease: representativeness, ontologic category, and material. , 1998, Neuropsychology.
[62] T. Gale,et al. The Hatfield Image Test (HIT): A new picture test and norms for experimental and clinical use , 2009, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.
[63] L K Tyler,et al. Category-specific semantic deficits: the role of familiarity and property type reexamined. , 1998, Neuropsychology.