Adaptive-Multi-Reference Least Means Squares Filter

Adaptive filters are now becoming increasingly studied for their suitability in application to complex and non-stationary signals. Many adaptive filters utilise a reference input, that is used to form an estimate of the noise in the target signal. In this paper we discuss the application of adaptive filters for high electromyography contaminated electroencephalography data. We propose the use of multiple referential inputs instead of the traditional single input. These references are formed using multiple EMG sensors during an EEG experiment, each reference input is processed and ordered through firstly determining the Pearson’s r-squared correlation coefficient, from this a weighting metric is determined and used to scale and order the reference channels according to the paradigm shown in this paper. This paper presents the use and application of the Adaptive-Multi-Reference (AMR) Least Means Square adaptive filter in the domain of electroencephalograph signal acquisition.

[1]  John M. Stern,et al.  Atlas of EEG Patterns , 2004 .

[2]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Mikhail Kuznetsov,et al.  Filtering the surface EMG signal: Movement artifact and baseline noise contamination. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  S. Billings Nonlinear System Identification: NARMAX Methods in the Time, Frequency, and Spatio-Temporal Domains , 2013 .

[5]  G. Wilson,et al.  Removal of ocular artifacts from electro-encephalogram by adaptive filtering , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[6]  Thomas H. Wonnacott,et al.  Introductory Statistics , 2007, Technometrics.

[7]  R T Knight,et al.  A dry electrode for EEG recording. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Pei Wang,et al.  Online EMG artifacts removal from EEG based on blind source separation , 2010, 2010 2nd International Asia Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (CAR 2010).

[9]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  EMG contamination of EEG: spectral and topographical characteristics , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Kong-Aik Lee,et al.  Improving convergence of the NLMS algorithm using constrained subband updates , 2004, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[11]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[12]  Toshihisa Tanaka,et al.  Artifact suppression from EEG signals using data adaptive time domain filtering , 2012, Neurocomputing.

[13]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[14]  Rahul K. Kher,et al.  EEG Signal Enhancement and Estimation using Adaptive Filtering , 2013 .

[15]  L. Vigon,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of techniques for ocular artefact filtering of EEG waveforms , 2000 .

[16]  H. Jasper Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography , 1958 .