Operando Multi-modal Synchrotron Investigation for Structural and Chemical Evolution of Cupric Sulfide (CuS) Additive in Li-S battery

Conductive metal sulfides are promising multi-functional additives for future lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries. These can increase the sulfur cathode’s electrical conductivity to improve the battery’s power capability, as well as contribute to the overall cell-discharge capacity. This multi-functional electrode design showed initial promise; however, complicated interactions at the system level are accompanied by some detrimental side effects. The metal sulfide additives with a chemical conversion as the reaction mechanism, e.g., CuS and FeS2, can increase the theoretical capacity of the Li-S system. However, these additives may cause undesired parasitic reactions, such as the dissolution of the additive in the electrolyte. Studying such complex reactions presents a challenge because it requires experimental methods that can track the chemical and structural evolution of the system during an electrochemical process. To address the fundamental mechanisms in these systems, we employed an operando multimodal x-ray characterization approach to study the structural and chemical evolution of the metal sulfide—utilizing powder diffraction and fluorescence imaging to resolve the former and absorption spectroscopy the latter—during lithiation and de-lithiation of a Li-S battery with CuS as the multi-functional cathode additive. The resulting elucidation of the structural and chemical evolution of the system leads to a new description of the reaction mechanism.

[1]  R. Pattrick,et al.  The structure of amorphous copper sulfide precipitates: An X-ray absorption study , 1997 .

[2]  H. T. Evans Djurleite (Cu1.94S) and Low Chalcocite (Cu2S): New Crystal Structure Studies , 1979, Science.

[3]  M Newville,et al.  ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. , 2005, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[4]  D. Prendergast,et al.  Characterization of Polysulfide Radicals Present in an Ether‐Based Electrolyte of a Lithium–Sulfur Battery During Initial Discharge Using In Situ X‐Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Experiments and First‐Principles Calculations , 2015 .

[5]  Xianbo Shi,et al.  Performance calculations of the X-ray powder diffraction beamline at NSLS-II. , 2013, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[6]  Michael F Toney,et al.  In Operando X-ray diffraction and transmission X-ray microscopy of lithium sulfur batteries. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[7]  Kathryn E. Toghill,et al.  A multifunctional 3.5 V iron-based phosphate cathode for rechargeable batteries. , 2007, Nature materials.

[8]  Jean-Marie Tarascon,et al.  Reactivity of transition metal (Co, Ni, Cu) sulphides versus lithium: The intriguing case of the copper sulphide , 2006 .

[9]  T. Gustafsson,et al.  Towards an Understanding of Li2 O2 Evolution in Li-O2 Batteries: An In Operando Synchrotron X-ray Diffraction Study. , 2017, ChemSusChem.

[10]  Paul R. Shearing,et al.  Exploring 3D microstructural evolution in Li-Sulfur battery electrodes using in-situ X-ray tomography , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Chunsheng Wang,et al.  Sulfur-impregnated disordered carbon nanotubes cathode for lithium-sulfur batteries. , 2011, Nano letters.

[12]  Yi Cui,et al.  A Sulfur Cathode with Pomegranate‐Like Cluster Structure , 2015 .

[13]  Arumugam Manthiram,et al.  Rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[14]  Xiao‐Qing Yang,et al.  Investigation of the Li-S Battery Mechanism by Real-Time Monitoring of the Changes of Sulfur and Polysulfide Species during the Discharge and Charge. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[15]  P. Adelhelm,et al.  Copper sulfides for rechargeable lithium batteries: Linking cycling stability to electrolyte composition , 2014 .

[16]  Doron Aurbach,et al.  Sulfur‐Impregnated Activated Carbon Fiber Cloth as a Binder‐Free Cathode for Rechargeable Li‐S Batteries , 2011, Advanced materials.

[17]  K. Andreas Friedrich,et al.  In-situ X-ray diffraction studies of lithium-sulfur batteries , 2013 .

[18]  Justin C. Lytle,et al.  Multifunctional 3D nanoarchitectures for energy storage and conversion. , 2009, Chemical Society reviews.

[19]  Shengbo Zhang,et al.  Pyrite FeS2 as an efficient adsorbent of lithium polysulphide for improved lithium–sulphur batteries , 2016 .

[20]  K. Sun,et al.  Interaction of CuS and sulfur in Li-S battery system , 2017 .

[21]  C. Villevieille,et al.  Direct observation of lithium polysulfides in lithium–sulfur batteries using operando X-ray diffraction , 2017, Nature Energy.

[22]  H. Dai,et al.  Graphene-wrapped sulfur particles as a rechargeable lithium-sulfur battery cathode material with high capacity and cycling stability. , 2011, Nano letters.

[23]  Arumugam Manthiram,et al.  High‐Performance Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries with a Self‐Supported, 3D Li2S‐Doped Graphene Aerogel Cathodes , 2016 .

[24]  Landon Oakes,et al.  A multifunctional load-bearing solid-state supercapacitor. , 2014, Nano letters.

[25]  L. Nazar,et al.  A highly ordered nanostructured carbon-sulphur cathode for lithium-sulphur batteries. , 2009, Nature materials.

[26]  Jean-Marie Tarascon,et al.  Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage. , 2011, Nature materials.

[27]  Prashant Kumar,et al.  Quantitative X-ray Absorption and Emission Spectroscopies: Electronic Structure Elucidation of Cu2S and CuS. , 2013, Journal of materials chemistry. C.

[28]  Xingcheng Xiao,et al.  Multifunctional TiO2-C/MnO2 core-double-shell nanowire arrays as high-performance 3D electrodes for lithium ion batteries. , 2013, Nano letters.

[29]  Shengbo Zhang,et al.  Liquid electrolyte lithium/sulfur battery: Fundamental chemistry, problems, and solutions , 2013 .

[30]  Michael F Toney,et al.  In situ X-ray diffraction studies of (de)lithiation mechanism in silicon nanowire anodes. , 2012, ACS nano.

[31]  Shengdi Zhang Role of LiNO3 in rechargeable lithium/sulfur battery , 2012 .

[32]  Jianming Zheng,et al.  Direct Observation of Sulfur Radicals as Reaction Media in Lithium Sulfur Batteries , 2015 .

[33]  Zhe Yuan,et al.  Powering Lithium-Sulfur Battery Performance by Propelling Polysulfide Redox at Sulfiphilic Hosts. , 2016, Nano letters.

[34]  Chunjoong Kim,et al.  Elemental Sulfur and Molybdenum Disulfide Composites for Li-S Batteries with Long Cycle Life and High-Rate Capability. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[35]  A. Manthiram,et al.  Sulfur/lithium-insertion compound composite cathodes for Li–S batteries , 2014 .

[36]  Chunsheng Wang,et al.  Copper‐Stabilized Sulfur‐Microporous Carbon Cathodes for Li–S Batteries , 2014 .

[37]  P. Buvat,et al.  Fluorine-Free Pt Nanocomposites for Three-Phase Interfaces in Fuel Cell Electrodes , 2016 .

[38]  J. Ferrasse,et al.  Investigation of copper speciation in pig slurry by a multitechnique approach. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  A. Frenkel,et al.  New In-Situ and Operando Facilities for Catalysis Science at NSLS-II: The Deployment of Real-Time, Chemical, and Structure-Sensitive X-ray Probes , 2017 .

[40]  Céline Barchasz,et al.  Lithium/Sulfur Batteries Upon Cycling: Structural Modifications and Species Quantification by In Situ and Operando X‐Ray Diffraction Spectroscopy , 2015 .