A simplified fragility analysis of fan type cable stayed bridges

A simplified fragility analysis of fan type cable stayed bridges using Probabilistic Risk Analysis (PRA) procedure is presented for determining their failure probability under random ground motion. Seismic input to the bridge support is considered to be a risk consistent response spectrum which is obtained from a separate analysis. For the response analysis, the bridge deck is modeles as a beam supported on spring at different points. The stiffnesses of the springs are determined by a separate 2D static analysis of cable-tower-deck system. The analysis provides a coupled stiffness matrix for the spring system. A continuum method of analysis using dynamic stiffness is used to determine the dynamic properties of the bridges. The response of the bridge deck is obtained by the response spectrum method of analysis as applied to multidegree of freedom system which duly takes into account the quasi-static component of bridge deck vibration. The fragility analysis includes uncertainties arising due to the variation in ground motion, material property, modeling, method of analysis, ductility factor and damage concentration effect. Probability of failure of the bridge deck is determined by the First Order Second Moment (FOSM) method of reliability. A three span double plane symmetrical fan type cable stayed bridge of total span 689 m, is used as an illustrative example. The fragility curves for the bridge deck failure are obtained under a number of parametric variations. Some of the important conclusions of the study indicate that (i) not only vertical component but also the horizontal component of ground motion has considerable effect on the probability of failure; (ii) ground motion with no time lag between support excitations provides a smaller probability of failure as compared to ground motion with very large time lag between support excitation; and (iii) probability of failure may considerably increase soft soil condition.

[1]  P. K. Chatterjee,et al.  Dynamic response of trussed bridges for moving loads , 1993 .

[2]  Michel Bruneau Evaluation of System‐Reliability Methods for Cable‐Stayed Bridge Design , 1992 .

[3]  Mamoru Mizutani,et al.  A Seismic PRA Procedure in Japan and its Application to a Building Performance Safety Estimation: Part 2. Fragility Analysis , 1990 .

[4]  Y. Yeh,et al.  Spatial variation and stochastic modelling of seismic differential ground movement , 1988 .

[5]  Norman C. Rasmussen,et al.  A Probabilistic Risk Assessment—Related Methodology to Support Performance-Based Regulation Within the Nuclear Power Industry , 1996 .

[6]  A. Kiureghian A response spectrum method for random vibration analysis of mdf systems , 1981 .

[7]  T. K. Datta,et al.  Reliability Analysis of Suspension Bridges against Flutter , 2002 .

[8]  M. Matsubara,et al.  Estimation of the Failure Probability of Building Based on Observed Earthquake Records , 1993, Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems.

[9]  M. K. Ravindra System reliability considerations in probabilistic risk assesment of nuclear power plants , 1990 .

[10]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  System reliability of suspension bridges , 2002 .

[11]  T. K. Datta,et al.  Seismic behaviour of cable-stayed bridges under multi-component random ground motion , 1999 .

[12]  Murari Lal Gambhir,et al.  Stability Analysis and Design of Structures , 2004 .

[13]  Carl J. Costantino,et al.  Seismic Risk Assessments of Small Earth Dams , 1991 .

[14]  H O Madsen,et al.  WIND CRITERIA FOR LONG SPAN BRIDGES , 1992 .

[15]  M. Novak,et al.  Pipeline Response to Random Ground Motion , 1980 .

[16]  Y. K. Cheung,et al.  On the determination of natural frequencies and mode shapes of cable-stayed bridges , 2001 .