Geometric Location Techniques With SSSD in Wireless Cellular Networks: A Comparative Performance Study

Geometric location techniques involve using either distance or distance difference, which often results in a nonlinear least square (NLLS) estimation. Although many studies to tackle the NLLS estimation by iterative algorithm have been proposed, however in a practical environment for both distance and distance difference location techniques, there is no reported work on the achievable performance and still lacks a comparative performance study. Based on the stationary signal-strength- difference (SSSD) measurement data obtained from an experiment in a commercial wireless cellular network, we examine and compare the performance of both distance and distangradientce difference location techniques, using two iterative algorithms, namely, Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm (LMA) and gradient descent algorithm (GDA). Results demonstrate that for both types of location techniques the performance achieved by LMA is significantly better than that achieved by GDA, and for both types of algorithms the performance of distance location technique is better than that of distance difference location technique.

[1]  Jieh-Chian Wu,et al.  Analysis of hyperbolic and circular positioning algorithms using stationary signal-strength-difference measurements in wireless communications , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[2]  Wing-Kin Ma,et al.  Received signal strength based mobile positioning via constrained weighted least squares , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03)..

[3]  Simon Plass,et al.  Positioning Algorithms for Cellular Networks Using TDOA , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings.

[4]  Ken-Huang Lin,et al.  Distance Difference Error Correction by Least Square for Stationary Signal-Strength-Difference-Based Hyperbolic Location in Cellular Communications , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[5]  Ken-Huang Lin,et al.  Error Analysis of the Distance and Distance Difference for SSSD-based Wireless Location: Part II-Experimental Results , 2007, 2007 IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC2007-Spring.

[6]  M. Melamed Detection , 2021, SETI: Astronomy as a Contact Sport.

[7]  Mordecai Avriel,et al.  Nonlinear programming , 1976 .

[8]  George L. Turin,et al.  Simulation of urban vehicle-monitoring systems , 1972 .

[9]  K. C. Ho,et al.  A simple and efficient estimator for hyperbolic location , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[10]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[11]  Chris L. C. Wong,et al.  GSM-based mobile positioning using WAP , 2000, 2000 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. Conference Record (Cat. No.00TH8540).

[12]  Ken-Huang Lin,et al.  Error Analysis of the Distance and Distance Difference for SSSD-based Wireless Location: Part I-Theoretical Aspects , 2007, 2007 IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC2007-Spring.

[13]  Xinrong Li,et al.  RSS-Based Location Estimation with Unknown Pathloss Model , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Yiu-Tong Chan,et al.  Exact and approximate maximum likelihood localization algorithms , 2006, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[15]  Maurizio A. Spirito,et al.  On the accuracy of cellular mobile station location estimation , 2001, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[16]  WADE FOY,et al.  Position-Location Solutions by Taylor-Series Estimation , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[17]  Gordon L. Stüber,et al.  Subscriber location in CDMA cellular networks , 1998 .