De novo design of antibody complementarity determining regions binding a FLAG tetra-peptide

Computational antibody engineering efforts to date have focused on improving binding affinities or biophysical characteristics. De novo design of antibodies binding specific epitopes could greatly accelerate discovery of therapeutics as compared to conventional immunization or synthetic library selection strategies. Here, we employed de novo complementarity determining region (CDR) design to engineer targeted antibody–antigen interactions using previously described in silico methods. CDRs predicted to bind the minimal FLAG peptide (Asp–Tyr–Lys–Asp) were grafted onto a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) acceptor framework. Fifty scFvs comprised of designed heavy and light or just heavy chain CDRs were synthesized and screened for peptide binding by phage ELISA. Roughly half of the designs resulted in detectable scFv expression. Four antibodies, designed entirely in silico, bound the minimal FLAG sequence with high specificity and sensitivity. When reformatted as soluble antigen-binding fragments (Fab), these clones expressed well, were predominantly monomeric and retained peptide specificity. In both formats, the antibodies bind the peptide only when present at the amino-terminus of a carrier protein and even conservative peptide amino acid substitutions resulted in a complete loss of binding. These results support in silico CDR design of antibody specificity as an emerging antibody engineering strategy.

[1]  Tong Li,et al.  The Iterative Protein Redesign and Optimization (IPRO) suite of programs , 2015, J. Comput. Chem..

[2]  Bernhardt L. Trout,et al.  Design of therapeutic proteins with enhanced stability , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Daisuke Kuroda,et al.  Shape complementarity and hydrogen bond preferences in protein-protein interfaces: implications for antibody modeling and protein-protein docking , 2016, Bioinform..

[4]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Computer-aided antibody design , 2012, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[5]  P. T. Jones,et al.  Replacing the complementarity-determining regions in a human antibody with those from a mouse , 1986, Nature.

[6]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Crystal structure of the anti-His tag antibody 3D5 single-chain fragment complexed to its antigen. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  Alexey Teplyakov,et al.  Antibody modeling assessment II. Structures and models , 2014, Proteins.

[8]  M. Vendruscolo,et al.  Rational design of antibodies targeting specific epitopes within intrinsically disordered proteins , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Jamie B. Spangler,et al.  Antibodies to Interleukin-2 Elicit Selective T Cell Subset Potentiation through Distinct Conformational Mechanisms. , 2015, Immunity.

[10]  Joost Schymkowitz,et al.  Computational design of peptide ligands. , 2011, Trends in biotechnology.

[11]  G. Schneider,et al.  Designing antimicrobial peptides: form follows function , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[12]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  Structure-based design of supercharged, highly thermoresistant antibodies. , 2012, Chemistry & biology.

[13]  D. Ecker,et al.  The therapeutic monoclonal antibody market , 2015, mAbs.

[14]  Costas D. Maranas,et al.  OptMAVEn – A New Framework for the de novo Design of Antibody Variable Region Models Targeting Specific Antigen Epitopes , 2014, PloS one.

[15]  William R Schief,et al.  Computational design of protein antigens that interact with the CDR H3 loop of HIV broadly neutralizing antibody 2F5 , 2014, Proteins.

[16]  Costas D Maranas,et al.  Recent advances in computational protein design. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[17]  S. Smith‐Gill,et al.  X-ray snapshots of the maturation of an antibody response to a protein antigen , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[18]  J. Maynard,et al.  Crystallization chaperone strategies for membrane proteins. , 2011, Methods.

[19]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Shape complementarity at protein–protein interfaces , 1994, Biopolymers.

[20]  Timothy A. Whitehead,et al.  Computational Design of Proteins Targeting the Conserved Stem Region of Influenza Hemagglutinin , 2011, Science.

[21]  J. Maynard,et al.  Increased Fab thermoresistance via VH-targeted directed evolution. , 2015, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[22]  C D Maranas,et al.  OptCDR: a general computational method for the design of antibody complementarity determining regions for targeted epitope binding. , 2010, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[23]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  RosettaAntibody: antibody variable region homology modeling server , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  J. Gumbart,et al.  Structural and biophysical characterization of an epitope-specific engineered Fab fragment and complexation with membrane proteins: implications for co-crystallization. , 2015, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[25]  J. Maynard,et al.  Conversion of scFv peptide-binding specificity for crystal chaperone development. , 2011, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[26]  Kathryn S. Prickett,et al.  A Short Polypeptide Marker Sequence Useful for Recombinant Protein Identification and Purification , 1988, Bio/Technology.

[27]  Costas D. Maranas,et al.  MAPs: a database of modular antibody parts for predicting tertiary structures and designing affinity matured antibodies , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.

[28]  Paolo Marcatili,et al.  PIGS: automatic prediction of antibody structures , 2008, Bioinform..

[29]  A. Lesk,et al.  Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  Jonathan S Marvin,et al.  Redesigning an antibody fragment for faster association with its antigen. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[31]  David Baker,et al.  Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity , 2013, Nature.

[32]  Seung Hyun Kang,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies isolated without screening by analyzing the variable-gene repertoire of plasma cells , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[33]  Thomas M Truskett,et al.  Effects of protein engineering and rational mutagenesis on crystal lattice of single chain antibody fragments , 2014, Proteins.

[34]  A R Rees,et al.  WAM: an improved algorithm for modelling antibodies on the WEB. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[35]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  Application of asymmetric statistical potentials to antibody-protein docking , 2012, Bioinform..

[36]  S. Choe,et al.  Structure of anti-FLAG M2 Fab domain and its use in the stabilization of engineered membrane proteins. , 2006, Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology and crystallization communications.

[37]  George Georgiou,et al.  Protection against anthrax toxin by recombinant antibody fragments correlates with antigen affinity , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[38]  Christian W. Cobaugh,et al.  Synthetic antibody libraries focused towards peptide ligands. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  G. Georgiou,et al.  Crystal structure of the engineered neutralizing antibody M18 complexed to domain 4 of the anthrax protective antigen. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  J. Mascola,et al.  Broadly neutralizing antibodies and the search for an HIV-1 vaccine: the end of the beginning , 2013, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[41]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Computational de novo design of antibodies binding to a peptide with high affinity , 2017, Biotechnology and bioengineering.