Using a 3D Puzzle as a Metaphor for Learning Spatial Relations

We introduce a new metaphor for learning spatial relations—the 3D puzzle. With this metaphor users learn spatial relations by assembling a geometric model themselves. For this purpose, a 3D model of the subject at hand is enriched with docking positions which allow objects to be connected. Since complex 3D interactions are required to compose 3D objects, sophisticated 3D visualization and interaction techniques are included. Among these techniques are specialized shadow generation, snapping mechanisms, collision detection and the use of two-handed interaction. The 3D puzzle, similar to a computer game, can be operated at different levels of difficulty. To simplify the task, a subset of the geometry, e.g., the skeleton of an anatomic model, can be given initially. Moreover, textual information concerning the parts of the model is provided to support the user. With this approach we motivate students to explore the spatial relations in complex geometric models and at the same time give them a goal to achieve while learning takes place. A prototype of a 3D puzzle, which is designed principally for use in anatomy education, is presented.

[1]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  Perceiving spatial relationships in computer-generated images , 1992, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[2]  Andreas Pommert,et al.  A "Virtual Body" Model for Surgical Education and Rehearsal , 1996, Computer.

[3]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  Project GROPEHaptic displays for scientific visualization , 1990, SIGGRAPH.

[4]  Y. Guiard.  Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  V-COLLIDE: accelerated collision detection for VRML , 1997, VRML '97.

[6]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Two-handed input in a compound task , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[7]  S. Joy Mountford,et al.  The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design , 1990 .

[8]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Balancing usability and learning in an interface , 1997, CHI.

[9]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  The partial-occlusion effect: utilizing semitransparency in 3D human-computer interaction , 1996, TCHI.

[10]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Sculpting with the `ball and mouse' metaphor , 1991 .

[11]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  An Evaluation of Interaction Techniques for the Exploration of 3D-Illustrations , 1999, Software-Ergonomie.

[12]  Ken Hinckley,et al.  Passive real-world interface props for neurosurgical visualization , 1994, CHI '94.

[13]  Thomas Erickson,et al.  Working with interface metaphors , 1995 .

[14]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  Figure captions in visual interfaces , 1998, AVI '98.

[15]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  The effects of motion and stereopsis on three-dimensional visualization , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  Yoshiaki Katayama,et al.  VLEGO: a simple two-handed modeling environment based on toy blocks , 1996, VRST.

[17]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  Coherent Zooming of Illustrations with 3D-Graphics and Text , 1997, Graphics Interface.