A catchment-based approach to mapping hydrological ecosystem services using riparian habitat: A case study from the Wet Tropics, Australia

Abstract Hydrological processes have been identified as delivering ecosystem services that are fundamental to both human well-being and the maintenance of biodiversity. If we can map the hydrological processes and the threats to them, the integrity of the provision of ecosystem services from the catchment can be identified, highlighting areas in need of further protection. Using the Tully-Murray catchment in the Wet Tropics as a case study, we constructed a simplified description of the ecosystem functions and related processes, and identified the roles of the ecosystem service providers and beneficiaries. Mapping the riparian zone and adjacent land uses enabled us to visualise areas where non-remnant vegetation existed and also vegetation that was classified as ‘Endangered’ or ‘Of Concern’. An assessment of the riparian vegetation and adjacent land use revealed that 51% of the catchment contained non-remnant riparian vegetation (i.e. was cleared or under agricultural production) and 36% of remnant vegetation was described as “Endangered” with a further 35% being classified as “Of Concern”. This is consistent with the reported current threats from water quality degradation, habitat fragmentation and other anthropogenic influences driven by rapid economic growth. The findings and data derived from this project can be used for a range of purposes in managing the riparian zone. Mapping the riparian zone and adjacent land use has shown the different types of land uses that impact on waterways and this will assist natural resource managers in prioritizing areas where remnant vegetation should be retained or rehabilitated. With this information, adjacent landholders can improve their management of the riparian zone and remnant vegetation through gaining the ecosystem service benefits, and further are able to profit from grant applications and incentives. Maintaining a healthy waterway and retaining remnant riparian vegetation will offer the possibility to obtain many economic, biodiversity and aesthetic benefits both within the catchment and downstream as far as the Great Barrier Reef.

[1]  F. Palomares,et al.  Does riparian habitat condition influence mammalian carnivore abundance in Mediterranean ecosystems? , 2009, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[2]  P. Kareiva,et al.  An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Valuing watershed services: concepts and empirics from southeast Asia , 2004 .

[4]  G. De’ath,et al.  Species richness and community structure of reef-building corals on the nearshore Great Barrier Reef , 2006, Coral Reefs.

[5]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services , 2006, PLoS biology.

[6]  John Lyons,et al.  EFFECTS OF WATERSHED BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON HABITAT AND FISH IN WISCONSIN STREAMS 1 , 2002 .

[7]  L. Hateley,et al.  Catchment modelling of sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus nutrient loads with SedNet/ANNEX in the Tully–Murray basin , 2009 .

[8]  R. Tiner,et al.  Wetland Indicators: A Guide to Wetland Identification, Delineation, Classification, and Mapping , 1999 .

[9]  J. Zedler,et al.  Wetland resources : Status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability , 2005 .

[10]  J. Brodie,et al.  Catchment management and the Great Barrier Reef. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  F. Swanson,et al.  An Ecosystem Perspective of Riparian ZonesFocus on links between land and water , 1991 .

[12]  Kimberly E. Medley,et al.  Landscape change with agricultural intensification in a rural watershed, southwestern Ohio, U.S.A. , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[13]  O. Mertz,et al.  Ecosystem services and biodiversity in developing countries , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[14]  Susan K. Jacobson,et al.  Assessment of Farmer Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions toward Bird Conservation on Organic and Conventional Florida Farms , 2003 .

[15]  Jon Brodie,et al.  Exposure of inner-shelf reefs to nutrient enriched runoff entering the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon: post-European changes and the design of water quality targets. , 2006, Marine pollution bulletin.

[16]  D. E. Pagendam,et al.  Managing riparian lands to improve water quality: optimising nitrate removal via denitrification , 2006 .

[17]  G. Daily,et al.  Field evidence that ecosystem service projects support biodiversity and diversify options , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  F. Kroon,et al.  Catchment management and health of coastal ecosystems: synthesis and future research , 2009 .

[19]  Richard H. Norris,et al.  Can an indicator of river health be related to assessments from a catchment-scale sediment model? , 2008, Hydrobiologia.

[20]  R. L. Welcomme,et al.  Fisheries ecology of floodplain rivers , 1974 .

[21]  Jon Brodie,et al.  Identifying the land-based sources of suspended sediments, nutrients and pesticides discharged to the Great Barrier Reef from the Tully–Murray Basin, Queensland, Australia , 2009 .

[22]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Conservation Where People Live and Work , 2002 .

[23]  T. Aide,et al.  RIPARIAN VEGETATION AND STREAM CONDITION IN A TROPICAL AGRICULTURE–SECONDARY FOREST MOSAIC , 2003 .

[24]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: Are we asking the right questions? , 2004 .

[25]  I. Prosser,et al.  Influence of invasive macrophytes on channel morphology and hydrology in an open tropical lowland stream, and potential control by riparian shading. , 1998 .

[26]  R. D. Groot,et al.  A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services , 2002 .

[27]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Freshwater ecosystem services. , 1997 .

[28]  G. De’ath,et al.  Changes in algal, coral and fish assemblages along water quality gradients on the inshore Great Barrier Reef. , 2005, Marine pollution bulletin.

[29]  Britta Schaffelke,et al.  Spatial extent of riverine flood plumes and exposure of marine ecosystems in the Tully coastal region, Great Barrier Reef , 2009 .

[30]  F. Kroon.  Integrated research to improve water quality in the Great Barrier Reef region , 2009 .

[31]  P. A. Ryan.  Environmental effects of sediment on New Zealand streams: A review , 1991 .

[32]  Mathieu Rouget,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. , 2007 .

[33]  D. Pagendam,et al.  Development and application of the Riparian Mapping Tool to identify priority rehabilitation areas for nitrogen removal in the Tully-Murray basin, Queensland, Australia , 2009 .

[34]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Nature’s care: diarrhea, watershed protection, and biodiversity conservation in Flores, Indonesia , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[35]  Rodger B. Grayson,et al.  Performance of grass and rainforest riparian buffers in the wet tropics, Far North Queensland. 2. Water quality , 2004 .

[36]  N. Weston,et al.  Sustaining the Wet Tropics: A Regional Plan for Natural Resource Management , 2004 .

[37]  W. Erskine,et al.  A practical scientific approach to riparian vegetation rehabilitation in Australia. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[38]  R. Naiman,et al.  Riparia: Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Streamside Communities , 2005 .

[39]  R. Naiman,et al.  The Ecology of Interfaces: Riparian Zones , 1997 .

[40]  R. Pearson,et al.  The effect of fine sedimentation on tropical stream macroinvertebrate assemblages: a comparison using flow-through artificial stream channels and recirculating mesocosms , 2007, Hydrobiologia.

[41]  Greg Easson,et al.  The Effects of Riparian Vegetation on Bank Stability , 2002 .

[42]  Alan R. Hill,et al.  Nitrate Removal in Stream Riparian Zones , 1996 .

[43]  E. Tabacchi,et al.  Development, maintenance and role of riparian vegetation in the river landscape , 1998 .

[44]  Peter J. Edwards,et al.  The value of biodiversity : Where ecology and economy blend , 1998 .

[45]  G. Daily,et al.  The Nature and Value of Ecosystem Services: An Overview Highlighting Hydrologic Services , 2007 .

[46]  M. Furnas,et al.  Nitrogen levels in the Tully River--a long-term view. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[47]  Miles Furnas,et al.  Catchments and Corals: Terrestrial Runoff to the Great Barrier Reef , 2003 .

[48]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Research Needs , 2006, Science.

[49]  Alan P. Covich,et al.  Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Human-Dominated Watersheds: Biohydrology and Ecosystem Processes in the South Platte River Basin , 1999, Environmental management.

[50]  T. Ricketts,et al.  Mapping the Economic Costs and Benefits of Conservation , 2006, PLoS biology.

[51]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  A call to ecologists: measuring, analyzing, and managing ecosystem services , 2005 .

[52]  Rae Zimmerman,et al.  Information and farmers’ attitudes about pesticides, water quality, and related environmental effects ☆ , 1999 .

[53]  N. Stork,et al.  Catchment to reef: water quality and ecosystem health in tropical streams , 2008 .

[54]  David G. Tarboton,et al.  On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data , 1991 .

[55]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey , 2000 .

[56]  Angela H. Arthington,et al.  Importance of the riparian zone to the conservation and management of freshwater fish: a review , 2003 .

[57]  B. Sawynok,et al.  Freshwater Wetlands and Fish: Importance of Freshwater Wetlands to Marine Fisheries Resources in the Great Barrier Reef , 2005 .