The picture superiority effect in conceptual implicit memory: a conceptual distinctiveness hypothesis.

According to leading theories, the picture superiority effect is driven by conceptual processing, yet this effect has been difficult to obtain using conceptual implicit memory tests. We hypothesized that the picture superiority effect results from conceptual processing of a picture's distinctive features rather than a picture's semantic features. To test this hypothesis, we used 2 conceptual implicit general knowledge tests; one cued conceptually distinctive features (e.g., "What animal has large eyes?") and the other cued semantic features (e.g., "What animal is the figurehead of Tootsie Roll?"). Results showed a picture superiority effect only on the conceptual test using distinctive cues, supporting our hypothesis that this effect is mediated by conceptual processing of a picture's distinctive features.

[1]  E Tulving,et al.  Priming and human memory systems. , 1990, Science.

[2]  D. Schacter Implicit expressions of memory in organic amnesia: learning of new facts and associations. , 1987, Human neurobiology.

[3]  S. Nicolas The picture-superiority effect in category-association tests , 1995 .

[4]  R. Shepard Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures , 1967 .

[5]  A. Paivio Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. , 1991 .

[6]  H. Roediger,et al.  Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account , 1989 .

[7]  R. Cabeza A dissociation between two implicit conceptual tests supports the distinction between types of conceptual processing , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980 .

[9]  H L Roediger,et al.  Implicit memory. Retention without remembering. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[10]  R. Hunt,et al.  The Effects of Distinctiveness Require Reinstatement of Organization: The Importance of Intentional Memory Instructions , 2000 .

[11]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[12]  N. Mulligan The effects of generation on conceptual implicit memory , 2002 .

[13]  Mary Susan Weldon,et al.  FAILURE TO FIND THE PICTURE SUPERIORITY EFFECT IN IMPLICIT CONCEPTUAL MEMORY TESTS , 1996 .

[14]  M. C. Smith,et al.  Tracing the time course of picture--word processing. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  J D Gabrieli,et al.  Evidence for multiple mechanisms of conceptual priming on implicit memory tests. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  V. S. Reed,et al.  Learning to Order Pictures and Words: A Model of Sensory and Semantic Encoding. , 1977 .

[17]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Picture superiority in conceptual memory: Dissociative effects of encoding and retrieval tasks , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Allan Paivio,et al.  Memory for pictures and words as a function of level of processing: Depth or dual coding? , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[19]  A. Paivio Imagery and verbal processes , 1972 .

[20]  H. Roediger,et al.  Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Joan G. Snodgrass,et al.  The role of visual similarity in picture categorization , 1986 .