NMR Chemical Shift Perturbation Study of the N‐Terminal Domain of Hsp90 upon Binding of ADP, AMP‐PNP, Geldanamycin, and Radicicol

Hsp90 is one of the most abundant chaperone proteins in the cytosol. In an ATP‐dependent manner it plays an essential role in the folding and activation of a range of client proteins involved in signal transduction and cell cycle regulation. We used NMR shift perturbation experiments to obtain information on the structural implications of the binding of AMP‐PNP (adenylyl‐imidodiphosphate—a non‐hydrolysable ATP analogue), ADP and the inhibitors radicicol and geldanamycin. Analysis of 1H,15N correlation spectra showed a specific pattern of chemical shift perturbations at N210 (ATP binding domain of Hsp90, residues 1–210) upon ligand binding. This can be interpreted qualitatively either as a consequence of direct ligand interactions or of ligand‐induced conformational changes within the protein. All ligands show specific interactions in the binding site, which is known from the crystal structure of the N‐terminal domain of Hsp90. For AMP‐PNP and ADP, additional shift perturbations of residues outside the binding pocket were observed and can be regarded as a result of conformational rearrangement upon binding. According to the crystal structures, these regions are the first α‐helix and the “ATP‐lid” ranging from amino acids 85 to 110. The N‐terminal domain is therefore not a passive nucleotide‐binding site, as suggested by X‐ray crystallography, but responds to the binding of ATP in a dynamic way with specific structural changes required for the progression of the ATPase cycle.

[1]  J. Reinstein,et al.  N-terminal Residues Regulate the Catalytic Efficiency of the Hsp90 ATPase Cycle* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  L. Pearl,et al.  Letter to the Editor: Backbone resonance assignments of the 25kD N-terminal ATPase domain from the Hsp90 chaperone , 2002, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[3]  A. Bacher,et al.  Transcriptional regulation by antitermination. Interaction of RNA with NusB protein and NusB/NusE protein complex of Escherichia coli. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Eun-Ok Kim,et al.  Radicicol represses the transcriptional function of the estrogen receptor by suppressing the stabilization of the receptor by heat shock protein 90 , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[5]  C. Klein,et al.  NMR Spectroscopy Reveals the Solution Dimerization Interface of p53 Core Domains Bound to Their Consensus DNA* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  J. Buchner,et al.  Coordinated ATP Hydrolysis by the Hsp90 Dimer* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  J. Buchner,et al.  Hsp90: Chaperoning signal transduction , 2001, Journal of cellular physiology.

[8]  Jason C. Young,et al.  Hsp90: a specialized but essential protein-folding tool. , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  D. Patel,et al.  Peptide-triggered conformational switch in HIV-1 RRE RNA complexes , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[10]  J. Reinstein,et al.  C-terminal regions of Hsp90 are important for trapping the nucleotide during the ATPase cycle. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  Chrisostomos Prodromou,et al.  The ATPase cycle of Hsp90 drives a molecular ‘clamp’ via transient dimerization of the N‐terminal domains , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[12]  L. Busconi,et al.  Degradation of Heterotrimeric Gαo Subunits via the Proteosome Pathway Is Induced by the hsp90-specific Compound Geldanamycin* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  C. Ban,et al.  Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis A Switch in DNA Mismatch Repair , 1999, Cell.

[14]  W. Welch,et al.  Benzoquinoid ansamycins (herbimycin A and geldanamycin) interfere with the maturation of growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases. , 1999, Cell stress & chaperones.

[15]  Kurt Wüthrich,et al.  TROSY-TYPE TRIPLE-RESONANCE EXPERIMENTS FOR SEQUENTIAL NMR ASSIGNMENTS OF LARGE PROTEINS , 1999 .

[16]  M. Sameshima,et al.  Monomer arrangement in HSP90 dimer as determined by decoration with N and C-terminal region specific antibodies. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  L. Pearl,et al.  Structural basis for inhibition of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone by the antitumor antibiotics radicicol and geldanamycin. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[18]  F. Hartl,et al.  In Vivo Function of Hsp90 Is Dependent on ATP Binding and ATP Hydrolysis , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  K Wüthrich,et al.  TROSY in triple-resonance experiments: new perspectives for sequential NMR assignment of large proteins. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  L. Pearl,et al.  ATP binding and hydrolysis are essential to the function of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone in vivo , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[21]  Sreenath V. Sharma,et al.  Targeting of the protein chaperone, HSP90, by the transformation suppressing agent, radicicol , 1998, Oncogene.

[22]  J. Buchner,et al.  Two chaperone sites in Hsp90 differing in substrate specificity and ATP dependence. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Timothy A. J. Haystead,et al.  The Amino-terminal Domain of Heat Shock Protein 90 (hsp90) That Binds Geldanamycin Is an ATP/ADP Switch Domain That Regulates hsp90 Conformation* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  L. Pearl,et al.  Identification and Structural Characterization of the ATP/ADP-Binding Site in the Hsp90 Molecular Chaperone , 1997, Cell.

[25]  S. Grdadolnik,et al.  Glucose transporter of Escherichia coli: NMR characterization of the phosphocysteine form of the IIB(Glc) domain and its binding interface with the IIA(Glc) subunit. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[26]  W. Pratt,et al.  Steroid receptor interactions with heat shock protein and immunophilin chaperones. , 1997, Endocrine reviews.

[27]  Neal Rosen,et al.  Crystal Structure of an Hsp90–Geldanamycin Complex: Targeting of a Protein Chaperone by an Antitumor Agent , 1997, Cell.

[28]  P. Hajduk,et al.  Discovering High-Affinity Ligands for Proteins: SAR by NMR , 1996, Science.

[29]  S. Grzesiek,et al.  The solution structure of HIV-1 Nef reveals an unexpected fold and permits delineation of the binding surface for the SH3 domain of Hck tyrosine protein kinase , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[30]  P. V. van Zijl,et al.  Improved sensitivity of HSQC spectra of exchanging protons at short interscan delays using a new fast HSQC (FHSQC) detection scheme that avoids water saturation. , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[31]  L. Neckers,et al.  Inhibition of heat shock protein HSP90-pp60v-src heteroprotein complex formation by benzoquinone ansamycins: essential role for stress proteins in oncogenic transformation. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Vladimir Sklenar,et al.  Gradient-Tailored Water Suppression for 1H-15N HSQC Experiments Optimized to Retain Full Sensitivity , 1993 .

[33]  V. Saudek,et al.  Gradient-tailored excitation for single-quantum NMR spectroscopy of aqueous solutions , 1992, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[34]  L. Pearl,et al.  Structure, function, and mechanism of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone. , 2001, Advances in protein chemistry.

[35]  M. Inouye,et al.  GHKL, an emergent ATPase/kinase superfamily. , 2000, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[36]  Horst Kessler,et al.  Automated backbone assignment of labeled proteins using the threshold accepting algorithm , 1998, Journal of biomolecular NMR.