An Improved Method for High Quality Metagenomics DNA Extraction from Human and Environmental Samples

To explore the natural microbial community of any ecosystems by high-resolution molecular approaches including next generation sequencing, it is extremely important to develop a sensitive and reproducible DNA extraction method that facilitate isolation of microbial DNA of sufficient purity and quantity from culturable and uncultured microbial species living in that environment. Proper lysis of heterogeneous community microbial cells without damaging their genomes is a major challenge. In this study, we have developed an improved method for extraction of community DNA from different environmental and human origin samples. We introduced a combination of physical, chemical and mechanical lysis methods for proper lysis of microbial inhabitants. The community microbial DNA was precipitated by using salt and organic solvent. Both the quality and quantity of isolated DNA was compared with the existing methodologies and the supremacy of our method was confirmed. Maximum recovery of genomic DNA in the absence of substantial amount of impurities made the method convenient for nucleic acid extraction. The nucleic acids obtained using this method are suitable for different downstream applications. This improved method has been named as the THSTI method to depict the Institute where the method was developed.

[1]  Jennifer M. Fettweis,et al.  The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies , 2015, BMC Microbiology.

[2]  Rob Knight,et al.  Metagenomics reveals sediment microbial community response to Deepwater Horizon oil spill , 2014, The ISME Journal.

[3]  Katherine H. Huang,et al.  A framework for human microbiome research , 2012, Nature.

[4]  P. Gajer,et al.  Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Sharmila S. Mande,et al.  Gut Microbiomes of Indian Children of Varying Nutritional Status , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  Katherine H. Huang,et al.  Structure, Function and Diversity of the Healthy Human Microbiome , 2012, Nature.

[7]  J. Clemente,et al.  Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography , 2012, Nature.

[8]  Se Jin Song,et al.  The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn's disease. , 2014, Cell host & microbe.

[9]  C. Filip,et al.  Solubilization of the Cytoplasmic Membrane of Escherichia coli by the Ionic Detergent Sodium-Lauryl Sarcosinate , 1973, Journal of bacteriology.

[10]  J. Petrosino,et al.  The Placenta Harbors a Unique Microbiome , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[11]  D. Sinderen,et al.  Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly , 2012, Nature.

[12]  John A. Todd,et al.  Metagenomics and Personalized Medicine , 2011, Cell.

[13]  P. Chomczyński,et al.  Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. , 1987, Analytical biochemistry.

[14]  C. Schindler,et al.  PURIFICATION AND PROPERTIES OF LYSOSTAPHIN--A LYTIC AGENT FOR STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS. , 1965, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[15]  S. Nishimura,et al.  Mutanolysin, Bacteriolytic Agent for Cariogenic Streptococci: Partial Purification and Properties , 1974, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[16]  L. Ursell,et al.  Gut Microbiomes of Malawian Twin Pairs Discordant for Kwashiorkor , 2013, Science.

[17]  Rashidul Haque,et al.  Members of the human gut microbiota involved in recovery from Vibrio cholerae infection , 2014, Nature.