Strategic rehabilitation planning of piped water networks using multi-criteria decision analysis.

To overcome the difficulties of strategic asset management of water distribution networks, a pipe failure and a rehabilitation model are combined to predict the long-term performance of rehabilitation strategies. Bayesian parameter estimation is performed to calibrate the failure and replacement model based on a prior distribution inferred from three large water utilities in Switzerland. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and scenario planning build the framework for evaluating 18 strategic rehabilitation alternatives under future uncertainty. Outcomes for three fundamental objectives (low costs, high reliability, and high intergenerational equity) are assessed. Exploitation of stochastic dominance concepts helps to identify twelve non-dominated alternatives and local sensitivity analysis of stakeholder preferences is used to rank them under four scenarios. Strategies with annual replacement of 1.5-2% of the network perform reasonably well under all scenarios. In contrast, the commonly used reactive replacement is not recommendable unless cost is the only relevant objective. Exemplified for a small Swiss water utility, this approach can readily be adapted to support strategic asset management for any utility size and based on objectives and preferences that matter to the respective decision makers.

[1]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  RELATIVE RISK AVERSION. , 1982 .

[2]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions , 1979, Oper. Res..

[3]  Philip Garcia,et al.  The informational content of the shape of utility functions: financial strategic behavior , 2009 .

[4]  Gilberto Montibeller,et al.  Combining scenario planning and multi-criteria decision analysis in practice , 2006 .

[5]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[6]  Balvant Rajani,et al.  Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: statistical models , 2001 .

[7]  David Ardia,et al.  DEoptim: An R Package for Global Optimization by Differential Evolution , 2009 .

[8]  Larry W. Mays Review of reliability analysis of water distribution systems , 1996 .

[9]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[10]  Colin Christian,et al.  Bayesian-based pipe failure model , 2004 .

[11]  B. Bremond,et al.  The impact of pipe segment length on break predictions in water distribution systems , 2007 .

[12]  Dragan Savic,et al.  Rehabilitation strategies for water distribution networks: a literature review with a UK perspective , 2000 .

[13]  Dragan Savic,et al.  Whole life costing: application to water distribution network , 2003 .

[14]  C T Haas,et al.  Application of system dynamics for developing financially self-sustaining management policies for water and wastewater systems. , 2011, Water research.

[15]  Anthony N. Tafuri,et al.  Rehabilitation of Aging Water Infrastructure Systems: Key Challenges and Issues , 2012 .

[16]  A. I. J. Heather,et al.  Water industry asset management: a proposed service‐performance model for investment , 2007 .

[17]  G. Pelletier,et al.  Modeling the evolution of the structural state of water pipe networks with brief recorded pipe break histories: Methodology and application , 2000 .

[18]  Symeon E. Christodoulou,et al.  Rehabilitation and maintenance of water distribution network assets , 2008 .

[19]  Daniela Fuchs-Hanusch,et al.  Whole of Life Cost Calculations for Water Supply Pipes , 2011 .

[20]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Robustness in operational research and decision aiding: A multi-faceted issue , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Cedric E. Ginestet ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis , 2011 .

[22]  H. Levy,et al.  The Efficiency Analysis of Choices Involving Risk1 , 1975 .

[23]  Rolf Baur,et al.  Multi-criteria decision support for annual rehabilitation programmes in drinking water networks , 2003 .

[24]  E. Renaud,et al.  Using a break prediction model for drinking water networks asset management: From research to practice , 2011 .

[25]  A Huvstig,et al.  WHOLE LIFE COSTING , 1999 .

[26]  Steffen Bayer,et al.  Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world , 2004 .

[27]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[28]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Feature Article - Decision Analysis: An Overview , 1982, Oper. Res..

[29]  Helena Alegre Is strategic asset management applicable to small and medium utilities? , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[30]  M Maurer,et al.  Identifying biases in deterioration models using synthetic sewer data. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[31]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Scenario and multiple criteria decision analysis for energy and environmental security of military and industrial installations , 2011, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[32]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[33]  Paul Davis,et al.  Asset planning for water reticulation systems - the PARMS model , 2003 .

[34]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[35]  S T Coelho,et al.  Urban water infrastructure asset management - a structured approach in four water utilities. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[36]  P. Schoemaker Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking , 1995 .

[37]  Lisa Scholten,et al.  Combining expert knowledge and local data for improved service life modeling of water supply networks , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[38]  Balvant Rajani,et al.  Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: physically based models , 2001 .

[39]  Peter Reichert,et al.  Constructing, evaluating and visualizing value and utility functions for decision support , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[40]  Balvant Rajani,et al.  Quantifying Effectiveness of Cathodic Protection in Water Mains: Theory , 2004 .

[41]  Jeffrey L. Ringuest,et al.  Probabilistic dominance criteria for comparing uncertain alternatives: A tutorial , 2009 .

[42]  H Alegre,et al.  Prioritization of rehabilitation interventions for urban water assets using multiple criteria decision-aid methods. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[43]  Franz Eisenführ,et al.  Rational Decision Making , 2010 .

[44]  Marc Parizeau,et al.  Multiobjective Approach for Pipe Replacement Based on Bayesian Inference of Break Model Parameters , 2009 .

[45]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Bridging uncertain and ambiguous knowledge with imprecise probabilities , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[46]  Lisa Scholten,et al.  Structured decision-making for sustainable water infrastructure planning and four future scenarios , 2015 .

[47]  M Maurer,et al.  Network condition simulator for benchmarking sewer deterioration models. , 2011, Water research.

[48]  Antonio Gasparrini,et al.  Distributed Lag Linear and Non-Linear Models in R: The Package dlnm. , 2011, Journal of statistical software.

[49]  Balvant Rajani,et al.  Planning renewal of water mains while considering deterioration, economies of scale and adjacent infrastructure , 2010 .

[50]  Stefano Alvisi,et al.  Comparative analysis of two probabilistic pipe breakage models applied to a real water distribution system , 2010 .

[51]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Integrating multicriteria decision analysis and scenario planning—Review and extension , 2013 .

[52]  Sunil J Rao,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2003 .

[53]  Jayanath Ananda,et al.  Evaluating public risk preferences in forest land-use choices using multi-attribute utility theory , 2005 .

[54]  Lisa Scholten,et al.  Extension of pipe failure models to consider the absence of data from replaced pipes. , 2013, Water research.

[55]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  A ZERO-INFLATED BAYESIAN MODEL FOR THE PREDICTION OF WATER PIPE BURSTS , 2009 .

[56]  Ana Debón,et al.  Evaluation of the Reliability of a Water Supply Network from Right-Censored and Left-Truncated Break Data , 2010 .

[57]  R. K. Herz,et al.  Exploring rehabilitation needs and strategies for water distribution networks , 1998 .

[58]  Helge Brattebø,et al.  Asset Management for Urban Wastewater Pipeline Networks , 2010 .

[59]  Josef Hadar,et al.  Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects , 1969 .

[60]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[61]  Shlomo Yitzhaki,et al.  Gini’s Mean difference: a superior measure of variability for non-normal distributions , 2003 .

[62]  John C. Nash,et al.  Unifying Optimization Algorithms to Aid Software System Users: optimx for R , 2011 .

[63]  Rolf Baur,et al.  Integrated failure forecasting model for the strategic rehabilitation planning process , 2005 .

[64]  Gerald Gangl,et al.  PIREM – PIPE REHABILITATION MANAGEMENT DEVELOPING A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR REHABILITATION PLANNING OF WATER MAINS , 2008 .

[65]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[66]  G. Montibeller,et al.  Exploring the impact of evaluating strategic options in a scenario-based multi-criteria framework , 2013 .

[67]  S. Burn,et al.  A pathway to a more sustainable water sector: sustainability-based asset management. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[68]  B. Roy The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods , 1991 .

[69]  Daniele B. Laucelli,et al.  Development of rehabilitation plans for water mains replacement considering risk and cost-benefit assessment , 2006 .

[70]  Balvant Rajani,et al.  Using limited data to assess future needs , 1999 .

[71]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Increasing risk: I. A definition , 1970 .

[72]  Dragan Savic,et al.  Trade-off between Total Cost and Reliability for Anytown Water Distribution Network , 2005 .

[73]  K. Ingold,et al.  Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[74]  Steven P. Schnaars How to develop and use scenarios , 1987 .

[75]  S. Yitzhaki,et al.  Marginal conditional stochastic dominance , 1994 .

[76]  David Hope,et al.  Managing infrastructure for the next generation , 1999 .

[77]  N. Schuwirth,et al.  Methodological aspects of multi-criteria decision analysis for policy support: A case study on pharmaceutical removal from hospital wastewater , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[78]  Paul Goodwin,et al.  Enhancing Strategy Evaluation in Scenario Planning: a Role for Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[79]  Dana J. Vanier,et al.  Why industry needs asset management tools , 2001 .

[80]  Paola Verlicchi,et al.  Water Science and technology: Water Supply , 2013 .

[81]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.