A semantic network model for measuring engagement and performance in online learning platforms

Due to the increasing global availability of the internet, online learning platforms such as Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), have become a new paradigm for distance learning in engineering education. While interactions between instructors and students are readily observable in a physical classroom environment, monitoring student engagement is challenging in MOOCs. Monitoring student engagement and measuring its impact on student performance are important for MOOC instructors, who are focused on improving the quality of their courses. The authors of this work present a semantic network model for measuring the different word associations between instructors and students in order to measure student engagement in MOOCs. Correlation analysis is then performed for identifying how student engagement in MOOCs affect student performance. Real‐world MOOC transcripts and MOOC discussion forum data are used to evaluate the effectiveness of this research.

[1]  Rudi Studer,et al.  The Semantic Web: Research and Applications , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[2]  Conrad S. Tucker,et al.  Quantifying the Mismatch Between Course Content and Students’ Dialogue in Online Learning Environments , 2017 .

[3]  John S. Gero,et al.  Social learning in design teams: The importance of direct and indirect communications , 2013, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[4]  Junling Wang,et al.  Design, implementation and evaluation of MOOCs and DBL‐based cross‐registration , 2018, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ..

[5]  Hernane Borges de Barros Pereira,et al.  Semantic networks based on titles of scientific papers , 2011 .

[6]  Dirk Schaefer,et al.  Enhancing Mechanical Engineering Distance Education Through IT-Enabled Remote Laboratories , 2009 .

[7]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Jack Mostow,et al.  A Generic Tool to Browse Tutor-Student Interactions: Time Will Tell! , 2005, AIED.

[9]  Judy Kay,et al.  Clustering and Sequential Pattern Mining of Online Collaborative Learning Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[10]  Hangjung Zo,et al.  Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Roy Williams,et al.  The Ideals and Reality of Participating in a MOOC , 2010, Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning.

[12]  Sung Hoon Lim,et al.  An unsupervised machine learning model for discovering latent infectious diseases using social media data , 2017, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[13]  Choon Lang Quek,et al.  Modelling Relationships between Students' Academic Achievement and Community of Inquiry in an Online Learning Environment for a Blended Course. , 2016 .

[14]  Dursun Delen,et al.  Predicting and analyzing secondary education placement-test scores: A data mining approach , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Pin-Ju Chen,et al.  MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[16]  C. Osvaldo Rodriguez,et al.  MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. , 2012 .

[17]  Moti Zwilling,et al.  Student data mining solution-knowledge management system related to higher education institutions , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Computers in Education: Activities, Contributions, and Future Trends , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[19]  Khaled A. Mohamed,et al.  Web-Based and Interactive E-Learning Framework for Supporting Mechanical Education Systems , 2006 .

[20]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Collaborative filtering recommendation for MOOC application , 2017, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ..

[21]  Zoran Budimac,et al.  Data science in education: Big data and learning analytics , 2017, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ..

[22]  Martin F. Porter,et al.  An algorithm for suffix stripping , 1997, Program.

[23]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .

[24]  Marek Hatala,et al.  What do cMOOC participants talk about in social media?: a topic analysis of discourse in a cMOOC , 2015, LAK.

[25]  Conrad S. Tucker,et al.  Modeling the Semantic Structure of Textually Derived Learning Content and its Impact on Recipients' Response States , 2016 .

[26]  Dianne H.B. Welsh,et al.  The New Generation of Massive Open Online Course (MOOCS) and Entrepreneurship Education , 2013 .

[27]  Meng Chang Chen,et al.  Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[28]  David E. Pritchard,et al.  Studying Learning in the Worldwide Classroom Research into edX's First MOOC. , 2013 .

[29]  Jahangir Karimi,et al.  Student engagement in course-based social networks: The impact of instructor credibility and use of communication , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[30]  J. Beck,et al.  An Educational Data Mining Tool to Browse Tutor-Student Interactions : Time Will Tell ! , 2005 .

[31]  Pushpak Bhattacharyya,et al.  Text Clustering using Semantics , 2002 .

[32]  Fred G. Martin,et al.  Will massive open online courses change how we teach? , 2012, CACM.

[33]  Conrad S. Tucker,et al.  Mitigating Online Product Rating Biases Through the Discovery of Optimistic, Pessimistic, and Realistic Reviewers , 2017 .

[34]  J. M. LUNA,et al.  MDM tool: A data mining framework integrated into Moodle , 2017, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ..

[35]  Catherine A. Bliss,et al.  cMOOCs and Global Learning: An Authentic Alternative. , 2013 .

[36]  Kalyan Veeramachaneni,et al.  Analyzing Millions of Submissions to Help MOOC Instructors Understand Problem Solving , 2013 .

[37]  Kathryn Weed Jablokow,et al.  A Multidisciplinary MOOC on Creativity, Innovation, and Change: Encour- aging Experimentation and Experiential Learning on a Grand Scale , 2014 .

[38]  Andreas Hotho,et al.  Semantic Network Analysis of Ontologies , 2006, LWA.

[39]  SaltonGerard,et al.  Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval , 1988 .

[40]  Alvaro Ortigosa,et al.  Recommendation in Higher Education Using Data Mining Techniques , 2009, EDM.

[41]  Tai-Chang Hsia,et al.  Course planning of extension education to meet market demand by using data mining techniques - an example of Chinkuo technology university in Taiwan , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[42]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  The MOOC as Distributed Intelligence: Dimensions of a Framework & Evaluation of MOOCs , 2013, CSCL.

[43]  Yun Liu,et al.  A decision theoretical approach for diffusion promotion , 2009 .

[44]  Yin Yin,et al.  A phenomenology of learning large: the tutorial sphere of xMOOC video lectures , 2014 .

[45]  Tamer M. Wasfy,et al.  Web-Based Multimedia Lecture Delivery System With Text-to-Speech and Virtual Instructors , 2005 .

[46]  Justin Reich,et al.  Computer-Assisted Reading and Discovery for Student Generated Text in Massive Open Online Courses , 2014, J. Learn. Anal..

[47]  Seoung Bum Kim,et al.  Summarization of Documents by Finding Key Sentences Based on Social Network Analysis , 2015, IEA/AIE.

[48]  Brendan Tangney,et al.  'First Aid for You': getting to know your learning style using machine learning , 2005, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05).