Identifying stakeholders in a Portuguese university: a case study La identificación de los stakeholders en una universidad portuguesa

The Stakeholder Theory proved highly useful to some specific organisations with dispersed powers, such as is the case of universities. This theory may serve to explain the focus on varying communities in the environments surrounding these organisations as well as the relationships between organisations and communities. However, identifying and prioritising the different stakeholders to a university has not proven an easy question to resolve. Given the effective management of university stakeholders necessarily requires the correct identification of just who they are, this article seeks to identify, classify and rank the stakeholders of a university based upon a case study. To this end, we reviewed previous studies sharing similar objectives. After finding that university stakeholders have rarely been identified by empirical means, we carried out a case study on a Portuguese state university that sought to identify and qualify the importance of the respective stakeholder through such means. A series of interviews were held with fifteen individuals, connected with the institution, three from each hierarchical university level. Following content analysis of these interviews, a list containing 21 stakeholders was resulted, duly classified by importance. The final results found students, the teaching and/or research staff and employers identified as the main stakeholders. Furthermore, findings pointed to stakeholders connected to research are gaining greater importance in the contemporary university environment. Indeed, the list clarifies the complexity of universities in identifying 21 distinct groups of stakeholders making this type of organisation a managerial challenge. Given this, stakeholders need to be attributed priorities, with some prevailing over others as it would seem impossible to attribute equal attention to them all.

[1]  Kim Watty,et al.  When will Academics Learn about Quality? , 2003 .

[2]  Maureen Tam,et al.  Measuring Quality and Performance in Higher Education , 2001 .

[3]  Bruce Macfarlane,et al.  Stakeholder conceptions of quality in single company management education , 1999 .

[4]  Adriana Zait Higher Education Marketing: Stakeholders' Perceptions, Degree of Trust and Desired Student Abilities - Case of Romania (Preliminary Raw Results) , 2006 .

[5]  Thorsten Hennig-Thurau,et al.  Modeling and Managing Student Loyalty: An Approach Based on Relationship Quality , 2001 .

[6]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  Essentials of Business Research Methods , 2003 .

[7]  A. Friedman,et al.  Stakeholders: Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[8]  Junichi Nishimura,et al.  Has the industrial cluster project improved the R&D efficiency of industry-university partnership in Japan? , 2008 .

[9]  Tony Conway,et al.  Strategic Planning in Higher Education , 1994 .

[10]  James J. Duderstadt,et al.  Fire, Ready, Aim! University Decision-Making During an Era of Rapid Change , 2000 .

[11]  Toby Weaver,et al.  What Is the Good of Higher Education , 1976 .

[12]  Hope Ashiabor,et al.  Stakeholder expectations for generic skills in accounting graduates, curriculum mapping and implications for change , 2006 .

[13]  Dmitry Suspitsin,et al.  Between the State and the Market: Sources of Sponsorship and Legitimacy in Russian Nonstate Higher Education , 2007 .

[14]  Snejana Slantcheva Legitimating the Difference: Private Higher Education Institutions in Central and Eastern Europe , 2007 .

[15]  Hans C. Giesecke Gaining Legitimacy: A Continuum on the Attainment of Recognition , 2007 .

[16]  Rosetta R. Reed,et al.  Situational Marketing: Application for Higher Education Institutions. , 1995 .

[17]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[18]  P. Kotler,et al.  Strategic Marketing for Educational Institutions , 1995 .

[19]  Michael X Cohen Leadership and ambiguity: the American college president, , 1974 .

[20]  H. Etzkowitz Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2002 .

[21]  Jose M. Arau Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function , 2002 .

[22]  B. Clark,et al.  The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. , 1984 .

[23]  Fernando Alexandre,et al.  Evaluating student allocation in the Portuguese public higher education system , 2008 .

[24]  Alberto Amaral,et al.  The Emergent Role of External Stakeholders in European Higher Education Governance , 2002 .

[25]  S. Tamer Cavusgil,et al.  Marketing planning for colleges and universities , 1984 .

[26]  Daniel C. Levy Indian Private Higher Education in Comparative Perspective. PROPHE Working Paper Series. WP No. 13. , 2008 .

[27]  Catharina Bj ɬ rkquist Continuity and Change in Stakeholder Influence: Reflections on Elaboration of Stakeholder Regimes , 2009 .

[28]  Tim Rowley Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[29]  H. Matlay Entrepreneurship education in the UK: A critical analysis of stakeholder involvement and expectations , 2009 .

[30]  Jürgen Enders,et al.  Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda , 2008 .

[31]  B. Clark Creating entrepreneurial universities , 1998 .

[32]  Jürgen Enders,et al.  Higher Education and its Communities: Interconnections and Interdependencies , 2007 .

[33]  Markus Langer,et al.  Modeling and Managing Student Loyalty , 2001 .

[34]  Jeff Frooman Stakeholder Influence Strategies , 1999 .

[35]  Lawrence R.P. Reavill,et al.  Quality assessment, total quality management and the stakeholders in the UK higher education system , 1998 .

[36]  Daniel C. Levy Indian Private Higher Education in Comparative Perspective , 2008 .

[37]  Sylvia M. Brown A systemic perspective on higher education in the United Kingdom , 1999 .

[38]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[39]  M. Denscombe The Good Research Guide: for small-scale social research projects , 1998 .

[40]  Sylwia Męcfal Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[41]  Sandra Beach Who or what decides how stakeholders are optimally engaged by governance networks delivering public outcomes , 2009 .

[42]  Dennis Bertrand,et al.  Organisation of First-Cycle Teaching at University: Models and Issues. , 1998 .

[43]  Mário Raposo,et al.  Conceptual Model of Student Satisfaction in Higher Education , 2007 .

[44]  K. Goodpaster Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis , 1991, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[45]  M. Clarkson A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[46]  M. Polonsky A stakeholder theory approach to designing environmental marketing strategy , 1995 .

[47]  Marie Pachuashvili,et al.  Chapter Three Legitimacy Sources and Private Growth in the Post-Communist Context , 2007 .