Measuring performance within the supply chain of a large scale project

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the performance measurement methodology used by a real case company, namely Vanderlande Industries Ltd, for cost and progress capture for in‐house production, resale material and third party supplied material, in an effort to measure performance of the supply chain of a large scale project – the €6bn London Heathrow Airport Terminal 5 construction project.Design/methodology/approach – The case study approach was adopted, which includes ethnography. This research is not about testing a theory; it is about gaining insight to the actual functioning and supply chain performance measuring of a large‐scale project. In that sense, the experiences reported could be shared with those dealing with performance measurement of large‐scale projects.Findings – Eight key areas of concerns are found relating to supply chain performance measurement of a large‐scale project: performance measurement requirements, with forecasting and progress reporting not owned by suppliers;...

[1]  C Eden,et al.  Mapping distinctive competencies: a systemic approach , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[2]  Alan Bryman,et al.  Research Methods and Organization Studies , 1989 .

[3]  Jan Stentoft Arlbjørn,et al.  Supply chain management practices in toy supply chains , 2005 .

[4]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[5]  I. Papadakis Financial performance of supply chains after disruptions: an event study , 2006 .

[6]  Susan Howick,et al.  The impact of disruption and delay when compressing large projects: going for incentives? , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  H. Walker,et al.  Risk in supply networks , 2003 .

[8]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[9]  R. Alt,et al.  Successful use of e‐procurement in supply chains , 2005 .

[10]  Samuel H. Huang,et al.  Manufacturing supply chain design and evaluation , 2005 .

[11]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  A seamless supply chain management model for construction , 2004 .

[12]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  The role of feedback dynamics in disruption and delay on the nature of disruption and delay (D&D) in major projects , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  B. Çatay,et al.  Competition through collaboration: insights from an initiative in the Turkish textile supply chain , 2005 .

[14]  A. Bubshait Incentive/disincentive contracts and its effects on industrial projects , 2003 .

[15]  A. Fearne,et al.  Collaborative commerce or just common sense? Insights from vegetable supply chains in Ho Chi Minh City , 2005 .

[16]  S. Gary Teng,et al.  Integrating the US textile and apparel supply chain with small companies in South America , 2006 .

[17]  T. Berends Cost plus incentive fee contracting - experiences and structuring , 2000 .

[18]  T. F. Burgess,et al.  Modelling a complex supply chain: understanding the effect of simplified assumptions , 2005 .

[19]  Gary David Holt,et al.  Reducing construction costs: European best practice supply chain implications , 2000 .