Automatic Detection of Breast Tumors in Sonoelastographic Images Using DWT

Breast Cancer is the most common malignancy in women and the second leading cause of death for women all over the world. Earlier the detection of cancer, better the treatment. The diagnosis and treatment of the cancer rely on segmentation of Sonoelastographic images. Texture features has not considered for Sonoelastographic segmentation. Sonoelastographic images of 15 patients containing both benign and malignant tumorsare considered for experimentation.The images are enhanced to remove noise in order to improve contrast and emphasize tumor boundary. It is then decomposed into sub-bands using single level Daubechies wavelets varying from single co-efficient to six coefficients. The Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), Local Binary Pattern (LBP) features are extracted and then selected by ranking it using Sequential Floating Forward Selection (SFFS) technique from each sub-band. The resultant images undergo K-Means clustering and then few postprocessing steps to remove the false spots. The tumor boundary is detected from the segmented image. It is proposed that Local Binary Pattern (LBP) from the vertical coefficients of Daubechies wavelet with two coefficients is best suited for segmentation of Sonoelastographic breast images among the wavelet members using one to six coefficients for decomposition. The results are also quantified with the help of an expert radiologist. The proposed work can be used for further diagnostic process to decide if the segmented tumor is benign or malignant. Keywords—Breast Cancer, Segmentation, Sonoelastography, Tumor Detection.

[1]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[2]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Floating search methods in feature selection , 1994, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[3]  Hui Zhi,et al.  Comparison of Ultrasound Elastography, Mammography, and Sonography in the Diagnosis of Solid Breast Lesions , 2007, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[4]  A. Mojsilovic,et al.  Wavelet image extension for analysis and classification of infarcted myocardial tissue , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  Edge-guided boundary delineation in prostate ultrasound images , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[7]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing - The Sparse Way, 3rd Edition , 2008 .

[8]  Arivazhagan Selvaraj,et al.  Texture classification using wavelet transform , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[9]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics , 2011 .

[10]  C. Rekha,et al.  Approaches For Automated Detection And Classification Of Masses In Mammograms , 2014 .

[11]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Line and boundary detection in speckle images , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[12]  S. Suresh,et al.  Feature Extraction for Characterization of Breast Lesions in Ultrasound Echography and Elastography , 2010 .

[13]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  Pubic arch detection in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate cancer therapy , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[16]  J. A. Hartigan,et al.  A k-means clustering algorithm , 1979 .