Networks in Context: The Social Flow of Political Information

We examine the effects of individual political preferences and the distribution of such preferences on the social transmission of political information. Our data base combines a 1984 election survey of citizens in South Bend, Indiana with a subsequent survey of people with whom these citizens discuss politics. Several findings emerge from the effort. First, individuals do purposefully construct informational networks corresponding to their own political preferences, and they also selectively misperceive socially supplied political information. More important, both of these individual-level processes are shown to be conditioned by constraints imposed due to the distribution of political preferences in the social context. Thus, individual control over socially supplied political information is partial and incomplete. Finally, these information-transmitting processes interact with the social context in a manner that favors partisan majorities while undermining political minorities.

[1]  John D. Sprague,et al.  Choice, Social Structure, and Political Information: The Informational Coercion of Minorities * , 1988 .

[2]  Courtney L. Brown,et al.  Political Context and Attitude Change , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[3]  EDWARD E. JONES,et al.  Interpreting Interpersonal Behavior: The Effects of Expectancies , 1986, Science.

[4]  M. Lewis-Beck.  Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy* , 1986 .

[5]  I. McAllister,et al.  Social Context and Electoral Behavior in Britain , 1985 .

[6]  M. M. Ferree,et al.  Zeitgeist as an Empirical Phenomenon@@@The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion--Our Social Skin. , 1985 .

[7]  Hedley Rees,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1985 .

[8]  Randall L. Calvert,et al.  The Value of Biased Information: A Rational Choice Model of Political Advice , 1985, The Journal of Politics.

[9]  G. Maddala.  Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[10]  Thad A. Brown.  On Contextual Change and Partisan Attributes , 1981, British Journal of Political Science.

[11]  L. Boyd,et al.  Contextual Analysis: Concepts and Statistical Techniques , 1979 .

[12]  D. Alwin.  Assessing School Effects: Some Identities. , 1976 .

[13]  R. Alba,et al.  Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks. , 1974 .

[14]  A. Finifter.  The Friendship Group as a Protective Environment for Political Deviants , 1974, American Political Science Review.

[15]  R. Hauser.  Contextual Analysis Revisited , 1974 .

[16]  K. Shepsle.  The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[17]  William N. McPhee,et al.  Formal theories of mass behavior , 1964 .

[18]  Warren E. Miller.  One-Party Politics and the Voter , 1956, American Political Science Review.

[19]  L. Katz,et al.  Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. , 1954 .

[20]  R. Matthews,et al.  Youth and Political Change , 1954 .

[21]  T. W. Roberts.  Behavior of Organisms , 1942 .

[22]  Lee S. Smith,et al.  An Explanation , 1889, The American journal of dental science.

[23]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Strategies of political inquiry , 1982 .

[24]  A. Downs.  An Economic Theory of Democracy , 1957 .