A mediating role of the premotor cortex in phoneme segmentation

Consistent with a functional role of the motor system in speech perception, disturbing the activity of the left ventral premotor cortex by means of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been shown to impair auditory identification of syllables that were masked with white noise. However, whether this region is crucial for speech perception under normal listening conditions remains debated. To directly test this hypothesis, we applied rTMS to the left ventral premotor cortex and participants performed auditory speech tasks involving the same set of syllables but differing in the use of phonemic segmentation processes. Compared to sham stimulation, rTMS applied over the ventral premotor cortex resulted in slower phoneme discrimination requiring phonemic segmentation. No effect was observed in phoneme identification and syllable discrimination tasks that could be performed without need for phonemic segmentation. The findings demonstrate a mediating role of the ventral premotor cortex in speech segmentation under normal listening conditions and are interpreted in relation to theories assuming a link between perception and action in the human speech processing system.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  R. Diehl,et al.  Speech Perception , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  M. Arbib,et al.  Language within our grasp , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. , 1992, Science.

[5]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Processing of audiovisual speech in Broca's area , 2005, NeuroImage.

[7]  T. Paus,et al.  Modulation of Motor Excitability during Speech Perception: The Role of Broca's Area , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Steven L. Small,et al.  Listening to talking faces: motor cortical activation during speech perception , 2005, NeuroImage.

[9]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[10]  R S Frackowiak,et al.  A PET study of cognitive strategies in normal subjects during language tasks. Influence of phonetic ambiguity and sequence processing on phoneme monitoring. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The cortical organization of speech processing , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  Marco Iacoboni,et al.  The Essential Role of Premotor Cortex in Speech Perception , 2007, Current Biology.

[13]  Bernard Mazoyer,et al.  Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing , 2006, NeuroImage.

[14]  A. Liberman,et al.  On the relation of speech to language , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  S. Blumstein,et al.  The Role of Segmentation in Phonological Processing: An fMRI Investigation , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  G. Thierry,et al.  Renewal of the neurophysiology of language: functional neuroimaging. , 2005, Physiological reviews.

[18]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[19]  F. Aboitiz,et al.  The evolutionary origin of the language areas in the human brain. A neuroanatomical perspective , 1997, Brain Research Reviews.

[20]  J. Desmond,et al.  Functional Specialization for Semantic and Phonological Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex , 1999, NeuroImage.

[21]  Joanne L. Miller,et al.  Speech Perception , 1990, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[22]  Robert Chen,et al.  Observation–execution matching system for speech: a magnetic stimulation study , 2001, Neuroreport.

[23]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[24]  Adriana A. Zekveld,et al.  Top–down and bottom–up processes in speech comprehension , 2006, NeuroImage.

[25]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Vincent L. Gracco,et al.  Imaging speech production using fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[27]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  K. Watkins,et al.  Stimulating language: insights from TMS. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  Anthony R. McIntosh,et al.  Clustered functional MRI of overt speech production , 2006, NeuroImage.

[30]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Frank H. Guenther,et al.  An fMRI investigation of syllable sequence production , 2006, NeuroImage.

[32]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  M. Arbib From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[34]  S. Small,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of Segmenting Speech and Nonspeech , 2006, Cortex.

[35]  Jeffery A. Jones,et al.  Brain activity during audiovisual speech perception: An fMRI study of the McGurk effect , 2003, Neuroreport.

[36]  David A. Medler,et al.  Neural correlates of sensory and decision processes in auditory object identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Perception of matching and conflicting audiovisual speech in dyslexic and fluent readers: An fMRI study at 3 T , 2006, NeuroImage.

[38]  P. Denes On the Motor Theory of Speech Perception , 1965 .

[39]  M. Turvey,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language , 2004, Cognition.

[41]  Jacques Durand,et al.  Phonology from phonetics to cognition , 2002 .

[42]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[43]  T. Paus,et al.  Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  Costanza Papagno,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Phonological Short-term Memory: A Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  Giulio Tononi,et al.  Direct evidence for a prefrontal contribution to the control of proactive interference in verbal working memory , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Jeremy I. Skipper,et al.  Seeing Voices : How Cortical Areas Supporting Speech Production Mediate Audiovisual Speech Perception , 2007 .

[47]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Phonological and lexical motor facilitation during speech listening: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[48]  Francisco Aboitiz,et al.  Cortical memory mechanisms and language origins , 2006, Brain and Language.

[49]  A. Nobre,et al.  Dissociating Linguistic Processes in the Left Inferior Frontal Cortex with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2022 .

[50]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory , 1993, Nature.

[51]  C. Fowler,et al.  Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English , 1997 .

[52]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  PET studies of phonetic processing of speech: review, replication, and reanalysis. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[53]  Marco Iacoboni,et al.  Neural responses to non-native phonemes varying in producibility: Evidence for the sensorimotor nature of speech perception , 2006, NeuroImage.

[54]  Diana L Miglioretti,et al.  Cortical Sites Critical for Speech Discrimination in Normal and Impaired Listeners , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[56]  E. Wassermann Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[57]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience – virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[58]  Richard Passingham,et al.  The Inferior Frontal Gyrus and Phonological Processing: An Investigation using rTMS , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[60]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[61]  D. Boatman Cortical bases of speech perception:evidence from functional lesion studies , 2004, Cognition.

[62]  Jeffery A. Jones,et al.  Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory–auditory/orosensory internal models , 2004, NeuroImage.