Análise da confiabilidade humana via redes Bayesianas: uma aplicação à manutenção de linhas de transmissão

Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) has been used to study the execution of human actions and their interactions with a system, taking into account its limitations and factors influencing the human performance. The HRA methods can be categorized into the first and second generation models. These models present some shortcomings such as unrealistic independence assumptions and simple binary representation of events. Therefore, they present a significant deficiency in modeling human actions. In this paper it is described a methodology for modeling human actions through Bayesian belief networks (BBN). The methodology provides a greater flexibility as not it only allows for a more realistic representation of the dynamic nature of man-system, but also allows for representation of the relationship of dependence among the events and performance shaping factors. This methodology is demonstrated in the context of human reliability in activities of maintenance of transmission line.

[1]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Model-based human reliability analysis: prospects and requirements , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  A Guide To Task Analysis: The Task Analysis Working Group , 1992 .

[3]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  A methodology for modeling operator errors of commission in probabilistic risk assessment , 1994 .

[4]  A. D. Swain,et al.  Comparative evaluation of methods for human reliability analysis , 1989 .

[5]  David I. Gertman Representing cognitive activities and errors in HRA trees , 1993 .

[6]  Inn Seock Kim Human reliability analysis in the man–machine interface design review , 2001 .

[7]  Regilda da Costa e Silva Menêzes Uma metodologia para avaliação da confiabilidade humana em atividades de substituição de cadeias de isoladores em linhas de transmissão , 2005 .

[8]  Emilie M. Roth,et al.  Modeling human intention formation for human reliability assessment , 1988 .

[9]  H. S. Blackman,et al.  Comparison and application of quantitative human reliability analysis methods for the risk methods integration and evaluation program (RMIEP): Final report , 1989 .

[10]  A. D. Swain,et al.  Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final report , 1983 .

[11]  L. Phillips,et al.  A socio-technical approach to assessing human reliability , 1990 .

[12]  Frank J. Groen,et al.  The combined use of data and expert estimates in population variability analysis , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  A Guide to Practical Human Reliability Assessment , 1994 .

[14]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive reliability and error analysis method , 1998 .

[15]  D. R. Desaulniers Stress in the control room: effects and solutions [nuclear power plants] , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Sixth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants, 1997. 'Global Perspectives of Human Factors in Power Generation'.

[16]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[17]  Kevin B. Korb,et al.  Bayesian Artificial Intelligence , 2004, Computer science and data analysis series.