Affective graphs: The visual appeal of Linked

The essence and value of Linked Data lies in the ability of humans and machines to query, access and reason upon highly structured and formalised data. Ontology structures provide an unambiguous description of the structure and content of data. While a multitude of software applications and visualisation systems have been developed over the past years for Linked Data, there is still a significant gap that exists between applications that consume Linked Data and interfaces that have been designed with significant focus on aesthetics. Though the importance of aesthetics in affecting the usability, effectiveness and acceptability of user interfaces have long been recognised, little or no explicit attention has been paid to the aesthetics of Linked Data applications. In this paper, we introduce a formalised approach to developing aesthetically pleasing Semantic Web interfaces by following aesthetic principles and guidelines identified from literature. We apply such principles to design and develop a generic approach of using visualisations to support exploration of Linked Data, in an interface that is pleasing to users. This provides users with means to browse ontology structures, enriched with statistics of the underlying data, facilitating exploratory activities and enabling visual query for highly precise information needs. We evaluated our approach in three ways: an initial objective evaluation comparing our approach with other well-known interfaces for the Semantic Web and two user evaluations with Semantic Web researchers.

[1]  P. Fayers,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1990 .

[2]  Holger Eichelberger,et al.  Nice class diagrams admit good design? , 2003, SoftVis '03.

[3]  Véronique Malaisé,et al.  An integrated approach for visual analysis of a multisource moving objects knowledge base , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Aba-Sah Dadzie,et al.  Approaches to visualising Linked Data: A survey , 2011, Semantic Web.

[5]  Roberto Tamassia,et al.  Curvilinear Graph Drawing Using the Force-Directed Method , 2004, GD.

[6]  Thomas Ertl,et al.  SemLens: visual analysis of semantic data with scatter plots and semantic lenses , 2011, I-Semantics '11.

[7]  Pak Chung Wong,et al.  Have Green - A Visual Analytics Framework for Large Semantic Graphs , 2006, 2006 IEEE Symposium On Visual Analytics Science And Technology.

[8]  Amy Ashurst Gooch,et al.  The Aesthetics of Graph Visualization , 2007, CAe.

[9]  D. Norman Emotional design : why we love (or hate) everyday things , 2004 .

[10]  David Salesin,et al.  Relations, cards, and search templates: user-guided web data integration and layout , 2007, UIST.

[11]  N. Garg,et al.  Aesthetic principles and cognitive emotion appraisals: How much of the beauty lies in the eye of the beholder? , 2010 .

[12]  James T. Enns,et al.  Harnessing Preattentive Processes for Multivariate Data Visualization , 1992 .

[13]  Afra Pascual,et al.  Building a Usable and Accessible Semantic Web Interaction Platform , 2010, World Wide Web.

[14]  Roi Blanco,et al.  Evaluating ad-hoc object retrieval , 2010, IWEST@ISWC.

[15]  Jürgen Umbrich,et al.  Searching and browsing Linked Data with SWSE: The Semantic Web Search Engine , 2011, J. Web Semant..

[16]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[17]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  principles in design , 1990 .

[18]  John V. Carlis,et al.  Interactive visualization of serial periodic data , 1998, UIST '98.

[19]  Stefan Decker,et al.  Sig.ma: Live views on the Web of Data , 2010, J. Web Semant..

[20]  James T. Enns,et al.  High-speed visual estimation using preattentive processing , 1996, TCHI.

[21]  P. Jordan Human factors for pleasure in product use. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[22]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  A Spectral Visualization System for Analyzing Financial Time Series Data , 2006, EuroVis.

[23]  Abraham Bernstein,et al.  Evaluating Semantic Search Systems to Identify Future Directions of Research , 2012, ESWC.

[24]  Dennis Wixon,et al.  User performance with command, menu, and iconic interfaces , 1985, CHI '85.

[25]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load While Learning to Use a Computer Program , 1996 .

[26]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  Using Graph Layout to Visualize Train Interconnection Data , 1998, Graph Drawing.

[27]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems , 1993, INTERCHI.

[28]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[29]  Lynda Hardman,et al.  /facet: A Browser for Heterogeneous Semantic Web Repositories , 2006, SEMWEB.

[30]  Moritz Stefaner,et al.  Elastic lists for facet browsers , 2007 .

[31]  Alfred Inselberg,et al.  Parallel Coordinates: Visual Multidimensional Geometry and Its Applications , 2003, KDIR.

[32]  William Ribarsky,et al.  Building and applying a human cognition model for visual analytics , 2009 .

[33]  Michael Burch,et al.  Towards an Aesthetic Dimensions Framework for Dynamic Graph Visualisations , 2009, 2009 13th International Conference Information Visualisation.

[34]  Nanyoung Kim,et al.  A History of Design Theory in Art Education , 2006, Journal of Aesthetic Education.

[35]  Soyeon Park Usability, user preferences, effectiveness, and user behaviors when searching individual and integrated full-text databases: implications for digital libraries , 2000 .

[36]  Jasni Mohamad Zain,et al.  Does Aesthetics of Web Page Interface Matters to Mandarin Learning? , 2011, ArXiv.

[37]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[38]  Judy Jeng,et al.  Usability Assessment of Academic Digital Libraries: Effectiveness, Efficiency, Satisfaction, and Learnability , 2005 .

[39]  P. Hekkert Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design , 2006 .

[40]  James T. Enns,et al.  Visualizing real-time multivariate data using preattentive processing , 1995, TOMC.

[41]  Enrico Motta,et al.  PowerAqua: Fishing the Semantic Web , 2006, ESWC.

[42]  Manojit Sarkar,et al.  Graphical fisheye views of graphs , 1992, CHI.

[43]  M. Bar,et al.  Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects , 2006, Psychological science.

[44]  Brian Shackel,et al.  Ergonomics in design for usability , 1986 .

[45]  Pak Chung Wong,et al.  Guest Editor's Introduction: Visual Data Mining , 1999, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[46]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Affective graphs: The visual appeal of Linked Data , 2015, Semantic Web.

[47]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces , 1990, CHI '90.

[48]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[49]  M. E. McGill,et al.  Dynamic Graphics for Statistics , 1988 .

[50]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  A Knowledge Dashboard for Manufacturing Industries , 2011, ESWC Workshops.

[51]  Wolfgang Kienreich,et al.  Visual Analyses on Linked Data – An Opportunity for both Fields , 2011 .

[52]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[53]  Rosni Abdullah,et al.  Aesthetic Measures for Assessing Graphic Screens , 2000, J. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[54]  Stefan Wrobel,et al.  Visual analytics tools for analysis of movement data , 2007, SKDD.

[55]  Yuanzhen Li,et al.  Measuring visual clutter. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[56]  David Chek Ling Ngo,et al.  Modelling interface aesthetics , 2003, Inf. Sci..

[57]  Lydia B. Chilton,et al.  Tabulator: Exploring and Analyzing linked data on the Semantic Web , 2006 .

[58]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Semantic web portals: state-of-the-art survey , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[59]  Abraham Bernstein,et al.  Evaluating the usability of natural language query languages and interfaces to Semantic Web knowledge bases , 2010, J. Web Semant..

[60]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[61]  N. Tractinsky,et al.  What is beautiful is usable , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[62]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Multi Visualization and Dynamic Query for Effective Exploration of Semantic Data , 2009, SEMWEB.

[63]  Fabio Ciravegna,et al.  Evaluating Semantic Search Query Approaches with Expert and Casual Users , 2012, SEMWEB.

[64]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Visualizing E-Brand Personality: Exploratory Studies on Visual Attributes and E-Brand Personalities in Korea , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[65]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Exploring user and system requirements of linked data visualization through a visual dashboard approach , 2014, Semantic Web.

[66]  David S. Ebert,et al.  A visual analytics process for maritime resource allocation and risk assessment , 2011, 2011 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).

[67]  John Hamer,et al.  Investigating Objective Measures of Web Page Aesthetics and Usability , 2011, AUIC.

[68]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1986 .

[69]  Monica M. C. Schraefel,et al.  mSpace: improving information access to multimedia domains with multimodal exploratory search , 2006, CACM.

[70]  Jasni Mohamad Zain,et al.  Probing a Self-Developed Aesthetics Measurement Application (SDA) in Measuring Aesthetics of Mandarin Learning Web Page Interfaces , 2011, ArXiv.

[71]  Richard Brath,et al.  Visualization for communication: the importance of aesthetic sizzle , 2005, Ninth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'05).

[72]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  The evaluation of text editors: methodology and empirical results. , 1983, CACM.

[73]  Mariëlle E. H. Creusen,et al.  The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice , 2005 .

[74]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  Finding the flow in web site search , 2002, CACM.

[75]  Kim Marriott,et al.  Memorability of Visual Features in Network Diagrams , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[76]  Krisztian Balog,et al.  Overview of the TREC 2010 Entity Track , 2010, TREC.

[77]  Helwig Hauser,et al.  Parallel Sets: interactive exploration and visual analysis of categorical data , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[78]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  A survey of software learnability: metrics, methodologies and guidelines , 2009, CHI.

[79]  Masaaki Kurosu,et al.  Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability , 1995, CHI 95 Conference Companion.