Quantitative imaging of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft demonstrates longitudinal compositional changes and relationships with clinical outcomes at 2 years after ACL reconstruction

T1ρ and T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may allow for a noninvasive assessment of ligamentization after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We hypothesized that ACL graft T1ρ and T2 relaxation times would decrease over time, that T1ρ and T2 relaxation times would be inversely correlated with Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS), and that T1ρ and T2 values would be lower for autograft relative to allograft reconstruction. Thirty‐nine patients (age: 30.5 ± 8.2 years) were followed prospectively after ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft (N = 27) or soft‐tissue allograft (N = 12). Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and KOOS surveys were completed at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. ACL graft was segmented to define T1ρ and T2 relaxation times. Relaxation times were compared between time points with ANOVA tests. Log‐transformed autograft and allograft relaxation times were compared with the Student t tests. The relationship between KOOS and relaxation times at 24 months was investigated with Spearman's rank correlation. ACL graft T1ρ relaxation times were significantly higher at 6 months relative to 12 months (P = .042), 24 months (P < .001), and 36 months (P < .001). ACL graft T2 relaxation times were significantly higher at 6 months relative to 12 months (P = .036), 24 months (P < .001), and 36 months (P < .001). T1ρ and T2 relaxation times were significantly lower for autograft reconstruction vs allograft reconstruction at 24 months postreconstruction. Two‐year KOOS Sports, Pain, and Symptoms were significantly inversely correlated with T1ρ and T2 relaxation times. T1ρ and T2 sequences may offer a noninvasive method for monitoring ACL graft maturation that correlates with patient‐reported knee function after ACL reconstruction.

[1]  N. Verma,et al.  Timeline for Maximal Subjective Outcome Improvement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2018, The American journal of sports medicine.

[2]  K. Cameron,et al.  Change in KOOS and WOMAC Scores in a Young Athletic Population With and Without Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury , 2018, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  Timothy E Hewett,et al.  Should Return to Sport be Delayed Until 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Biological and Functional Considerations , 2017, Sports Medicine.

[4]  Xiaojuan Li,et al.  Persistent Biomechanical Alterations After ACL Reconstruction Are Associated With Early Cartilage Matrix Changes Detected by Quantitative MR , 2016, Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine.

[5]  J Rivoire,et al.  Cartilage T1ρ and T2 relaxation times: longitudinal reproducibility and variations using different coils, MR systems and sites. , 2015, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  C. McCulloch,et al.  Three-dimensional MRI-based statistical shape model and application to a cohort of knees with acute ACL injury. , 2015, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[7]  J. Tokish,et al.  Autograft Versus Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2015, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  Xiaojuan Li,et al.  Abnormal tibial position is correlated to early degenerative changes one year following ACL reconstruction , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  R. LaPrade,et al.  Return to Play Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2015, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[10]  G. Badger,et al.  MRI Volume and Signal Intensity of ACL Graft Predict Clinical, Functional, and Patient-Oriented Outcome Measures After ACL Reconstruction , 2015, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  J. Machan,et al.  T2* MR relaxometry and ligament volume are associated with the structural properties of the healing ACL , 2014, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  S. Scheffler,et al.  Intra-articular remodelling of hamstring tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2013, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[13]  J. Machan,et al.  In Situ, Noninvasive, T2*-Weighted MRI-Derived Parameters Predict Ex Vivo Structural Properties of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction or Bioenhanced Primary Repair in a Porcine Model , 2013, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  J. Bellemans,et al.  The “Ligamentization” Process in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2011, The American journal of sports medicine.

[15]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  Quantitative MRI using T1ρ and T2 in human osteoarthritic cartilage specimens: correlation with biochemical measurements and histology. , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[16]  M. Salavati,et al.  Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS); reliability and validity in competitive athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2011, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[17]  Kurt P. Spindler,et al.  Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2011, Sports health.

[18]  M. Marcacci,et al.  Electron microscopy of the remodelling process in hamstring tendon used as ACL graft , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[19]  Y. Hachiya,et al.  Serial evaluation of human anterior cruciate ligament grafts by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of allografts and autografts. , 2008, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[20]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  In vivo T1ρ mapping in cartilage using 3D magnetization‐prepared angle‐modulated partitioned k‐space spoiled gradient echo snapshots (3D MAPSS) , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  S Majumdar,et al.  In vivo T(1rho) and T(2) mapping of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee using 3 T MRI. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[22]  A. Wallace,et al.  Tendons and ligaments are anatomically distinct but overlap in molecular and morphological features—a comparative study in an ovine model , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  S. Zaffagnini,et al.  Neoligamentization process of BTPB used for ACL graft: histological evaluation from 6 months to 10 years. , 2007, The Knee.

[24]  K. Fujii,et al.  Biochemical properties of collagen from ligaments and periarticular tendons of the human knee , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[25]  Dong Chul Kim,et al.  Histologic Findings of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Achilles Allograft , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  J. B. Kneeland,et al.  Proteoglycan‐induced changes in T1ρ‐relaxation of articular cartilage at 4T , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  B. Beynnon,et al.  Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--development of a self-administered outcome measure. , 1998, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[28]  M. Kurosaka,et al.  Light and electron microscopic study of remodeling and maturation process in autogenous graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 1993, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[29]  W. Akeson,et al.  The phenomenon of “Ligamentization”: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.