How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test

The Mantel test provides a means to test the association between distance matrices and has been widely used in ecological and evolutionary studies. Recently, another permutation test based on a Procrustes statistic (PROTEST) was developed to compare multivariate data sets. Our study contrasts the effectiveness, in terms of power and type I error rates, of the Mantel test and PROTEST. We illustrate the application of Procrustes superimposition to visually examine the concordance of observations for each dimension separately and how to conduct hypothesis testing in which the association between two data sets is tested while controlling for the variation related to other sources of data. Our simulation results show that PROTEST is as powerful or more powerful than the Mantel test for detecting matrix association under a variety of possible scenarios. As a result of the increased power of PROTEST and the ability to assess the match for individual observations (not available with the Mantel test), biologists now have an additional and powerful analytical tool to study ecological and evolutionary relationships.

[1]  Donald A. Jackson PROTEST: A PROcrustean Randomization TEST of community environment concordance , 1995 .

[2]  Donald A. Jackson,et al.  Fish and Benthic Invertebrates: Community Concordance and Community–Environment Relationships , 1993 .

[3]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Randomization and regression methods for testing for associations with geographical, environmental and biological distances between populations , 1986, Researches on Population Ecology.

[4]  M. Rodr STRUCTURE OF FISH ASSEMBLAGES ALONG ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENTS IN FLOODPLAIN LAKES OF THE ORINOCO RIVER , 1997 .

[5]  F L Bookstein,et al.  Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. , 1996, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[6]  A. Malhotra,et al.  Matrix Correspondence Tests on the DNA Phylogeny of the Tenerife Lacertid Elucidate both Historical Causes and Morphological Adaptation , 1996 .

[7]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry in the honey bee, Apis mellifera: effects of ploidy and hybridization , 1997 .

[8]  E. Dietz Permutation Tests for Association Between Two Distance Matrices , 1983 .

[9]  J. Gower,et al.  Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients , 1986 .

[10]  R. Sokal,et al.  Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the mantel test of matrix correspondence , 1986 .

[11]  Bieke Vanhooydonck,et al.  Variation in morphology, gait characteristics and speed of locomotion in two populations of lizards , 1998 .

[12]  Julian D. Olden,et al.  Assessing the robustness of randomization tests: examples from behavioural studies , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  M. E. Douglas,et al.  DID VICARIANCE MOLD PHENOTYPES OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN FISHES? EVIDENCE FROM GILA RIVER CYPRINIDS , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  An investigation of three-matrix permutation tests , 1992 .

[15]  Paul H. Harvey,et al.  New uses for new phylogenies , 1993, European Review.

[16]  J. Daltry,et al.  Relating Geographic Pattern to Phylogenetic Process , 1995 .

[17]  John C. Gower,et al.  Statistical methods of comparing different multivariate analyses of the same data , 1971 .

[18]  John A. Endler,et al.  Quantitative Matrix Comparisons in Ecological and Evolutionary Investigations , 1982 .

[19]  A. L. Buikema,et al.  Do similar communities develop in similar sites? A test with zooplankton structure and function , 1998 .

[20]  Donald A. Jackson STOPPING RULES IN PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS: A COMPARISON OF HEURISTICAL AND STATISTICAL APPROACHES' , 1993 .

[21]  Jonathan B. Losos,et al.  Ecomorphology, Performance Capability, and Scaling of West Indian Anolis Lizards: An Evolutionary Analysis , 1990 .

[22]  J. Losos,et al.  EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES OF ECOLOGICAL RELEASE IN CARIBBEAN ANOLIS LIZARDS , 1997 .

[23]  Marco A. Rodríguez,et al.  STRUCTURE OF FISH ASSEMBLAGES ALONG ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENTS IN FLOODPLAIN LAKES OF THE ORINOCO RIVER , 1997 .

[24]  C. Rosa,et al.  Yeast communities associated with different plant resources in sandy coastal plains of southeastern Brazil , 1995 .

[25]  A. Siegel,et al.  A robust comparison of biological shapes. , 1982, Biometrics.

[26]  Donald A. Jackson,et al.  Spatial isolation and fish communities in drainage lakes , 2001, Oecologia.

[27]  J. Kettenring,et al.  Canonical Analysis of Several Sets of Variables , 2022 .

[28]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks , 1990 .

[29]  W. J. Matthews,et al.  Does morphology predict ecology? Hypothesis testing within a freshwater stream fish assemblage , 1992 .

[30]  F. H. C. Marriott,et al.  Distributions, ordination and inference , 1994 .

[31]  Christian Peter Klingenberg,et al.  GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS OF DEVELOPMENTAL INSTABILITY: ANALYZING PATTERNS OF FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY WITH PROCRUSTES METHODS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  Wojtek J. Krzanowski,et al.  Error-rate estimation in two-group discriminant analysis using the linear discriminant function , 1990 .

[33]  Pedro R. Peres-Neto,et al.  When Are Random Data Not Random, or Is the PTP Test Useful? , 2000, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[34]  Donald A. Jackson,et al.  Are probability estimates from the permutation model of Mantel's test stable? , 1989 .

[35]  Donald A. Jackson,et al.  Biogeographic Associations in Fish Assemblages: Local vs. Regional Processes , 1989 .

[36]  E. Smith Randomization methods and the analysis of multivariate ecological data , 1998 .

[37]  K. Ruben Gabriel,et al.  A permutation test of association between configurations by means of the rv coefficient , 1998 .

[38]  R. Spielman Differences among Yanomama Indian villages: do the patterns of allele frequencies, anthropometrics and map locations correspond? , 1973, American journal of physical anthropology.

[39]  L R Monteiro,et al.  Multivariate regression models and geometric morphometrics: the search for causal factors in the analysis of shape. , 1999, Systematic biology.

[40]  Dominic Frigon,et al.  The Mantel test versus Pearson's correlation analysis : Assessment of the differences for biological and environmental studies , 2000 .

[41]  Brian H. McArdle,et al.  FITTING MULTIVARIATE MODELS TO COMMUNITY DATA: A COMMENT ON DISTANCE‐BASED REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[42]  N. Mantel The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. , 1967, Cancer research.