Functional Characteristics of the Gating Mechanism in the Canine A‐V Conducting System

The areas of maximum action potential duration, or gates, of the isolated canine distal A-V conducting system were studied by microelectrode techniques to determine the characteristics of their responses to premature impulses and to rapid rates of stimulation. The results indicate that premature responses will be conducted at the same velocity as driven responses until the coupling interval between the driven and premature impulses approaches the refractory period of the gate. When delayed conduction of the premature impulse develops, it occurs over a segment of the conducting system incorporating the gate. The magnitude of the delay which can develop at coupling intervals just in excess of the functional refractory period tends to be small in healthy tissue and larger in depressed tissue. Suitable delays allowed premature impulses having coupling intervals shorter than the refractory period at the gate to be conducted distally. The refractory period in response to rapid rates of stimulation was discordant in the several false tendons in six of nine preparations studied. Both delayed conduction and 2:1 conduction were shown to occur near the limit of response to rapid stimulation. The data presented suggest certain functional analogies between the A-V node and the gating mechanism.

[1]  B F Hoffman,et al.  Electrophysiological Properties of the Canine Peripheral A‐V Conducting System , 1970 .

[2]  W. J. Mueller,et al.  Interaction of Transmembrane Potentials in Canine Purkinje Fibers and at Purkinje Fiber‐Muscle Junctions , 1969, Circulation research.

[3]  J. B. Preston,et al.  Durations of Transmembrane Action Potentials and Functional Refractory Periods of Canine False Tendon and Ventricular Myocardium: Comparisons in Single Fibers , 1965, Circulation research.

[4]  R. Myerburg,et al.  On-line measurement of duration of cardiac action potentials and refractory periods. , 1970, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  M. B. Rosenbaum,et al.  The mechanism of bidirectional tachycardia. , 1969, American heart journal.

[6]  P. Samet,et al.  Wenckebach and Mobitz Type II A‐V Block Due to Block Within the His Bundle and Bundle Branches , 1970, Circulation.

[7]  D. Scherf,et al.  Tachycardias with alternation of the ventricular complexes. , 1967, American heart journal.

[8]  G. Moe,et al.  Aberrant A‐V Impulse Propagation in the Dog Heart: A Study of Functional Bundle Branch Block , 1965, Circulation research.

[9]  J. B. Preston,et al.  Physiologic Evidence for a Dual A‐V Transmission System , 1956, Circulation research.

[10]  Antonio Paes De Carvalho,et al.  Spread of activity through the atrioventricular node. , 1960 .

[11]  E. Moore,et al.  Functional Properties of the Atrioventricular Conduction System , 1963, Circulation research.

[12]  J. Bigger,et al.  Electrophysiological Effects of Diphenylhydantoin on Canine Purkinje Fibers , 1968, Circulation research.

[13]  D. Brody,et al.  Microelectrode Study of Delayed Conduction in the Canine Right Bundle Branch , 1968, Circulation research.

[14]  C. Fisch,et al.  Concealed conduction. , 1973, Cardiovascular clinics.

[15]  E. Moore,et al.  Initiation and conduction of impulses in partially depolarized cardiac fibers. , 1963, The American journal of physiology.

[16]  A. Castellanos The genesis of bidirectional tachycardias. , 1961, American heart journal.