Extracting Information from Cortical Connectivity Patterns Estimated from High Resolution EEG Recordings: A Theoretical Graph Approach

Over the last 20 years, a body of techniques known as high resolution EEG has allowed precise estimation of cortical activity from non-invasive EEG measurements. The availability of cortical waveforms from non-invasive EEG recordings allows to have not only the level of activation within a single region of interest (ROI) during a particular task, but also to estimate the causal relationships among activities of several cortical regions. However, interpreting resulting connectivity patterns is still an open issue, due to the difficulty to provide an objective measure of their properties across different subjects or groups. A novel approach addressed to solve this difficulty consists in manipulating these functional brain networks as graph objects for which a large body of indexes and tools are available in literature and already tested for complex networks at different levels of scale (Social, WorldWideWeb and Proteomics). In the present work, we would like to show the suitability of such approach, showing results obtained comparing separately two groups of subjects during the same motor task and two different motor tasks performed by the same group. In the first experiment two groups of subjects (healthy and spinal cord injured patients) were compared when they moved and attempted to move simultaneously their right foot and lips, respectively. The contrast between the foot–lips movement and the simple foot movement was addressed in the second experiment for the population of the healthy subjects. For both the experiments, the main question is whether the “architecture” of the functional connectivity networks obtained could show properties that are different in the two groups or in the two tasks. All the functional connectivity networks gathered in the two experiments showed ordered properties and significant differences from “random” networks having the same characteristic sizes. The proposed approach, based on the use of indexes derived from graph theory, can apply to cerebral connectivity patterns estimated not only from the EEG signals but also from different brain imaging methods.

[1]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic evaluation of resting-state functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Economic small-world behavior in weighted networks , 2003 .

[3]  Frank Harary,et al.  Graph Theory , 2016 .

[4]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging data: a simulation study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[5]  C. Uhl Analysis of neurophysiological brain functioning , 1999 .

[6]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The small world of the cerebral cortex , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[7]  P. Nunez,et al.  Neocortical Dynamics and Human EEG Rhythms , 1995 .

[8]  C. Stam,et al.  Small-world networks and functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  Complex networks: small-world, scale-free and beyond , 2003 .

[11]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Comparison of different cortical connectivity estimators for high‐resolution EEG recordings , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[12]  F. Babiloni,et al.  Assessing cortical functional connectivity by linear inverse estimation and directed transfer function: simulations and application to real data , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[14]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[15]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[16]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[17]  F. Babiloni,et al.  Estimation of the cortical functional connectivity with the multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and fMRI data by directed transfer function , 2005, NeuroImage.

[18]  P. Rossini,et al.  High-resolution electro-encephalogram: source estimates of Laplacian-transformed somatosensory-evoked potentials using a realistic subject head model constructed from magnetic resonance images , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[19]  Danny Dolev,et al.  Fault tolerance in the cardiac ganglion of the lobster , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[20]  C. Stam,et al.  Using graph theoretical analysis of multi channel EEG to evaluate the neural efficiency hypothesis , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  Bin He,et al.  Boundary Element Method-Based Cortical Potential Imaging of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Using Subjects' Magnetic Resonance Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[22]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[23]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[24]  B. He,et al.  High-resolution spatio-temporal functional neuroimaging of brain activity. , 2002, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[25]  S. Bressler,et al.  Event-related covariances during a bimanual visuomotor task. II. Preparation and feedback. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  Jian Le,et al.  Seeing through the skull: Advanced EEGs use MRIs to accurately measure cortical activity from the scalp , 2005, Brain Topography.

[27]  M P Young,et al.  Anatomical connectivity defines the organization of clusters of cortical areas in the macaque monkey and the cat. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[28]  A. Urbano,et al.  Dynamic functional coupling of high resolution EEG potentials related to unilateral internally triggered one-digit movements. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  G. Carter Coherence and time delay estimation , 1987, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[30]  J Gross,et al.  REPRINTS , 1962, The Lancet.

[31]  O. Sporns,et al.  Organization, development and function of complex brain networks , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  E. Halgren,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Mapping Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000, Neuron.

[33]  C. Büchel,et al.  Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al.  A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures , 1991, Biological Cybernetics.

[35]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[36]  J Gross,et al.  Properties of MEG tomographic maps obtained with spatial filtering , 2003, NeuroImage.

[37]  S. G. Andino,et al.  Distributed Source Models: Standard Solutions and New Developments , 1999 .

[38]  Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al.  Determination of EEG activity propagation: pair-wise versus multichannel estimate , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[40]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[41]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[42]  C. J. Stam,et al.  Functional connectivity patterns of human magnetoencephalographic recordings: a ‘small-world’ network? , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[43]  Martin E. Schwab,et al.  Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.