Rhetoric, Aboriginal Australians and the Northern Territory Intervention: A Socio-legal Investigation into Pre-legislative Argumentation

Presented within this article is a systematic discourse analysis of the arguments used by the then Australian Prime Minister and also the Minister for Indigenous Affairs in explaining and justifying the extensive and contentious intervention by the federal government into remote Northern Territory Aboriginal communities. The methods used within this article extend the socio-legal toolbox, providing a contextually appropriate, interdisciplinary methodology that analyses the speech act’s rhetorical properties. Although many academics use sound-bites of pre-legislative speech in order to support their claims, this analysis is concerned with investigating the contents of the speech acts in order to understand how the Prime Minister’s and Minister for Indigenous Affairs’ argumentations sought to achieve consensus to facilitate the enactment of legislation. Those seeking to understand legislative endeavours, policy makers and speech actors will find that paying structured attention to the rhetorical properties of speech acts yields opportunities to strengthen their insight. The analysis here indicates three features in the argumentation: the duality in the Prime Minister’s and Minister’s use of the Northern Territory Government’s Little Children are Sacred report; the failure to sufficiently detail the linkages between the Intervention and the measures combatting child sexual abuse; and the omission of recognition of Aboriginal agency and consultation.

[1]  The Emergence and Non-Emergence of Legislation , 1978 .

[2]  Empirical Legal Sociology and Political Process–A Case History and Some General Remarks* , 1988 .

[3]  Sue Gordon,et al.  Putting the Picture Together: Inquiry into Response by Government Agencies to Complaints of Family Violence and Child Abuse in Aboriginal Communities , 2002 .

[4]  W. Sanders.  Towards an Indigenous order of Australian government: Rethinking self-determination as Indigenous affairs policy , 2002 .

[5]  Annette Boaz,et al.  Social Science and the Evidence-based Policy Movement , 2002, Social Policy and Society.

[6]  A. Finlayson.  Political science, political ideas and rhetoric , 2004 .

[7]  Angela M Pratt,et al.  The end of ATSIC and the future administration of Indigenous affairs , 2004 .

[8]  G. Adams,et al.  Perceptions of Racism in Hurricane Katrina: A Liberation Psychology Analysis , 2006 .

[9]  Ronald R. Krebs,et al.  Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric , 2007 .

[10]  I. Anderson.  The end of Aboriginal self-determination? , 2007 .

[11]  Kyllie Cripps.  Indigenous family violence : from emergency measures to committed long-term action , 2007 .

[12]  R. Stringer.  A Nightmare of the Neocolonial Kind: Politics of Suffering in Howard's Northern Territory Intervention , 2007 .

[13]  Howard’s New Tampa — Aboriginal Children Overboard , 2007 .

[14]  A. Brown,et al.  The Northern Territory intervention: voices from the centre of the fringe , 2007, The Medical journal of Australia.

[15]  Patricia Anderson,et al.  Ampe Akelyernemane Meke Mekarle "Little children are sacred": Report of the NT Board of Inquiry into the protection of Aboriginal children from sexual abuse , 2007 .

[16]  Sally V Hunter,et al.  Child Maltreatment in Remote Aboriginal Communities and the Northern Territory Emergency Response: A Complex Issue , 2008 .

[17]  James Martin,et al.  ‘It Ain’t What You Say…’: British Political Studies and the Analysis of Speech and Rhetoric , 2008 .

[18]  Sarah Maddison.  Indigenous autonomy matters: what's wrong with the Australian government's ‘intervention’ in Aboriginal communities , 2008 .

[19]  A. Howe.  Addressing Child Sexual Assault in Australian Aboriginal Communities — The Politics of White Voice , 2009 .

[20]  P. Billings.  Still Paying the Price for Benign Intentions? Contextualising Contemporary Interventions in the Lives of Aboriginal Peoples , 2009 .

[21]  The Return to the Legal and Citizenship Void: Indigenous Welfare Quarantining in the Northern Territory and Cape York , 2009 .

[22]  Northern Territory National Emergency Response Revisited , 2010 .

[23]  Dennis Grube,et al.  The Rhetorical Framing of Policy Intervention , 2010 .

[24]  Deirdre Tedmanson,et al.  Neoptolemus: the governmentality of new race/pleasure wars? , 2010 .

[25]  Alissa Macoun.  Aboriginality and the Northern Territory Intervention , 2011 .

[26]  I. Watson.  In the Northern Territory Intervention, What is Saved or Rescued and at What Cost? , 2011 .

[27]  Sarah Maddison.  Evidence and Contestation in the Indigenous Policy Domain: Voice, Ideology and Institutional Inequality , 2012 .

[28]  S. Bielefeld.  Income management and Indigenous peoples: nudged into a Stronger Future? , 2014 .

[29]  James A. Roffee.  The Synthetic Necessary Truth Behind New Labour’s Criminalisation of Incest , 2014 .

[30]  Daphne Habibis,et al.  Separate worlds: A discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response in 2007 , 2015 .

[31]  The Howard Government's Northern Territory Intervention: Are Neo-Paternalism and Indigenous Development Compatible? , 2018 .