Systematic errors in the measurement of power spectral density

Measurement of the power spectral density (PSD) of a rough surface or feature involves large random and systematic errors. While random errors can be reduced by averaging together many PSDs, systematic errors can be reduced only by carefully studying and understanding the sources of these systematic errors. Using both analytical expressions and numerical simulations for the measurement of the PSD of line-edge roughness, three sources of systematic errors are evaluated: aliasing, leakage, and averaging. Exact and approximate expressions for each of these terms are derived over a range of roughness exponents, allowing a measured PSD to be corrected for its systematic biases. The smallest measurement bias is obtained when appropriate data windowing is used, and when the sampling distance is set to twice the measurement signal width. Uncorrected PSD measurements are likely to systematically bias the extracted roughness exponent to higher values.

[1]  Roel Gronheid,et al.  Resist roughness evaluation and frequency analysis: metrological challenges and potential solutions for extreme ultraviolet lithography , 2010 .

[2]  Benjamin Bunday,et al.  Bias reduction in roughness measurement through SEM noise removal , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[3]  E. Thorsos.  The Validity of the Kirchhoff Approximation for Rough Surface Scattering Using a Gaussian Roughness Spectrum , 2004 .

[4]  Atsushi Hiraiwa,et al.  Spectral analysis of line edge and line-width roughness with long-range correlation , 2010 .

[5]  Atsuko Yamaguchi,et al.  Bias-free measurement of LER/LWR with low damage by CD-SEM , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[6]  J. S. Villarrubia,et al.  Unbiased estimation of linewidth roughness , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[7]  A. Walther,et al.  Problem in the determination of correlation functions. II , 1977 .

[8]  A. Hiraiwa,et al.  Image-pixel averaging for accurate analysis of line-edge and linewidth roughness , 2011 .

[9]  Sophia Wang,et al.  Practical and bias-free LWR measurement by CDSEM , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Chris A. Mack.  Analytical expression for impact of linewidth roughness on critical dimension uniformity , 2014 .

[12]  J. Cain,et al.  Experimental and model-based study of the robustness of line-edge roughness metric extraction in the presence of noise , 2007 .

[13]  Cornelis W. Hagen,et al.  Determination of line edge roughness in low-dose top-down scanning electron microscopy images , 2014 .

[14]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77 , 1992 .

[15]  Harry J. Levinson,et al.  Line edge roughness and intrinsic bias for two methacrylate polymer resist systems , 2006 .

[16]  Atsushi Hiraiwa,et al.  Discrete power spectrum of line width roughness , 2009 .

[17]  Atsushi Hiraiwa,et al.  Statistical- and image-noise effects on experimental spectrum of line-edge and line-width roughness , 2010 .

[18]  Olivier Joubert,et al.  Plasma treatments to improve line-width roughness during gate patterning , 2013 .

[19]  Evangelos Gogolides,et al.  Effects of image noise on contact edge roughness and critical dimension uniformity measurement in synthesized scanning electron microscope images , 2013 .

[20]  C. Mack.  Generating random rough edges, surfaces, and volumes. , 2013, Applied optics.

[21]  C. Mack.  Analytic form for the power spectral density in one, two, and three dimensions , 2011 .

[22]  D. G. Watts,et al.  Spectral analysis and its applications , 1968 .

[23]  Atsuko Yamaguchi,et al.  Single-shot method for bias-free LER/LWR evaluation with little damage , 2007 .

[24]  Evangelos Gogolides,et al.  Noise-free estimation of spatial line edge/width roughness parameters , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[25]  Palasantzas.  Roughness spectrum and surface width of self-affine fractal surfaces via the K-correlation model. , 1993, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.