Significance of a combined approach for replacement stones in the heritage buildings’ conservation frame

Stone substitution is a conventional operation during heritage buildings' restoration, but becomes problematic for architects and restorers when the quarry is mined out. The compatibility of the substitution stones with the original ones has been for long mainly based on the aesthetical aspect, this resulting too often in a patchwork of original and substitution stones with different patina after several years because of differences of properties. In this study, the objective is to show how substitution stones can be selected by combining aesthetic criteria and stones properties that are relevant for analyzing their compatibility. A couple of French limestones with their potential substitution stones were selected for the study. Our results showed that potential substitution stones selected on their aesthetic criteria require to be rejected because of their differences of physical properties. On the other hand, our results showed also the possibility to select substitution stones with satisfactory aesthetic aspect and properties that enable to expect a satisfactory compatibility with the original stone.

[1]  B. Fitzner,et al.  Weathering damage on Pharaonic sandstone monuments in Luxor, Egypt , 2003 .

[2]  Siegfried Siegesmund,et al.  Natural Stone, Weathering Phenomena, Conservation Strategies and Case Studies , 2003 .

[3]  Dario Camuffo,et al.  Microclimate for Cultural Heritage , 1998 .

[4]  J. Mertz.  Structures de porosité et propriétés de transport dans les grès , 1991 .

[5]  Fabrizio Antonelli,et al.  Provenance of the ornamental stones used in the baroque church of S. Pietro in Valle (Fano, Central Italy) and commentary on their state of conservation , 2003 .

[6]  A. Tugrul,et al.  Research on limestone decay in a polluting environment, I˙stanbul-Turkey , 1999 .

[7]  K. Beck,et al.  Characterization, water transfer properties and deterioration in tuffeau: building material in the Loire valley—France , 2003 .

[8]  Philippe Bromblet,et al.  Diversity of the cleaning procedures including laser for the restoration of carved portals in France over the last 10 years , 2003 .

[9]  Giovanni G. Amoroso,et al.  Stone decay and conservation , 1983 .

[10]  J. Mertz,et al.  A geometrical model for numerical simulation of capillary imbibition in sedimentary rocks , 1993 .

[11]  Ákos Török,et al.  Oolitic limestone in a polluted atmospheric environment in Budapest: weathering phenomena and alterations in physical properties , 2002, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[12]  Dario Camuffo,et al.  Physical weathering of stones , 1995 .

[13]  Norbert S. Baer,et al.  Saving our architectural heritage : the conservation of historic stone structures : report of the Dahlem Workshop on Saving our Architectural Heritage--Conservation of Historic Stone Structures, Berlin, March 3-8, 1996 , 1997 .

[14]  A. Bruand,et al.  Composition, Fabric, and Porosity of an Arenic Haplustalf of Northeast Thailand , 2004 .

[15]  H. Siedel,et al.  A complex investigation of building sandstones from Saxony (Germany) , 2007 .

[16]  Giuseppe Cultrone,et al.  Durability of bricks used in the conservation of historic buildings — influence of composition and microstructure , 2003 .

[17]  A. Bruand,et al.  Effect of water content on the fabric of a soil material: an experimental approach. , 1987 .

[18]  RD（翻译）.  Composition 构好图，出好片 , 2010 .

[19]  Emmanuel Le Trong,et al.  2-D image analysis: A complementary tool for characterizing quarry and weathered building limestone , 2007 .

[20]  Michiel Dusar,et al.  Historical building stones in the province of Limburg (NE Belgium): role of petrography in provenance and durability assessment , 2004 .