Lumbar Decompression Using a Traditional Midline Appro ach Versus a Tubular Retractor System: Comparison of Patient-Based Clinical Outcomes

[1]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Surgical Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Four-Year Results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) , 2008, Spine.

[2]  Regis G. Hoppenot,et al.  Perioperative results following lumbar discectomy: comparison of minimally invasive discectomy and standard microdiscectomy. , 2008, Neurosurgical focus.

[3]  J. F. Harrington,et al.  Open versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Microdiscectomy: Comparison of Operative Times, Length of Hospital Stay, Narcotic Use and Complications , 2008, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[4]  Ulf Jakobsson,et al.  Using the 12-item Short Form health survey (SF-12) to measure quality of life among older people , 2007, Aging clinical and experimental research.

[5]  V. Vougioukas,et al.  Minimally Invasive Approach for the Treatment of Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniations. Technique and Results , 2007, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[6]  Xiaotao Wu,et al.  Microendoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Surgical Technique and Outcome in 873 Consecutive Cases , 2006, Spine.

[7]  V. Podichetty,et al.  Complications Associated With Minimally Invasive Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[8]  A. Ranjan,et al.  Microendoscopic discectomy for prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. , 2006, Neurology India.

[9]  K. Türeyen.  One-level one-sided lumbar disc surgery with and without microscopic assistance: 1-year outcome in 114 consecutive patients. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  Williams Rw.  Microdiskectomy--myth, mania, or milestone? An 18-year surgical adventure. , 1991 .