Is It Gropable? – Assessing the Impact of Mobility on Textile Interfaces

In a mobile environment, the visual attention a person can devote to a computer is often limited. In such situations, a manual interface should be “gropable,” that is, the user should be able to access and use the interface with little to no visual attention. We compare stationary and mobile input on two embroidered textile interfaces; a single touch three button interface and a multitouch four button interface that is activated by pressing two buttons at the same time. Sixteen participants completed 480 trials while walking a path and sitting. While multitouch increases the expressiveness of gestures that can be performed, our user study only shows a slight, not statistically signi¿cant, increase in accuracy and an understandable decrease in speed for simple selection tasks.

[1]  Mark T. Jones,et al.  Using electronic textiles to implement an acoustic beamforming array: A case study , 2007, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[2]  Kent Lyons,et al.  Reading on-the-go: a comparison of audio and hand-held displays , 2006, Mobile HCI.

[3]  Kent Lyons,et al.  Quickdraw: the impact of mobility and on-body placement on device access time , 2008, CHI.

[4]  S Park,et al.  The Wearable Motherboard: a flexible information infrastructure or sensate liner for medical applications. , 1999, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[5]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Evaluating capacitive touch input on clothes , 2008, Mobile HCI.

[6]  Neil Gershenfeld,et al.  E-broidery: Design and fabrication of textile-based computing , 2000, IBM Syst. J..

[7]  Zamora,et al.  Electronic textiles: a platform for pervasive computing , 2003, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  Maggie Orth,et al.  Smart fabric, or "wearable clothing" , 1997, Digest of Papers. First International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[9]  Leah Buechley,et al.  A Construction Kit for Electronic Textiles , 2006, 2006 10th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers.