Effects of technological learning and uranium price on nuclear cost: Preliminary insights from a multiple factors learning curve and uranium market modeling

This paper studies the effects of returns to scale, technological learning, i.e. learning-by-doing and learning-by-searching, and uranium price on the prospects of nuclear cost decrease. We use an extended learning curve specification, named multiple factors learning curve (MFLC). In a first stage, we estimate a single MFLC. In a second stage, we estimate the MFLC under the framework of simultaneous system of equations which takes into account the uranium supply and demand. This permits not only to enhance the reliability of the estimation by incorporating the uranium price formation mechanisms in the MFLC via the price variable, but also to give preliminary insights about uranium supply and demand behaviors and the associated effects on the nuclear expansion. Results point out that the nuclear cost has important prospects for decrease via capacity expansion, i.e. learning-by-doing effects. In contrast, they show that the learning-by-searching as well as the scale effects have a limited effect on the cost decrease prospects. Conversely, results also show that uranium price exerts a positive and significant effect on nuclear cost, implying that when the uranium price increases, the nuclear power generation cost decreases. Since uranium is characterized by important physical availability, and since it represents only a minor part in the total nuclear cost, we consider that in a context of increasing demand for nuclear energy the latter result can be explained by the fact that the positive learning effects on the cost of nuclear act in a way to dissipate the negative ones that an increase in uranium price may exert. Further, results give evidence of important inertia in the supply and demand sides as well as evidence of slow correlation between the uranium market and oil market which may limit the inter-fuels substituability effects, that is, nuclear capacity expansion and associated learning-by-doing benefits.

[1]  John P. Weyant,et al.  On the sources of technological change: Assessing the evidence , 2006 .

[2]  H. Theil,et al.  Three-Stage Least Squares: Simultaneous Estimation of Simultaneous Equations , 1962 .

[3]  J. Hausman Specification tests in econometrics , 1978 .

[4]  V. Amavilah,et al.  The influence of oil and coal prices on world uranium demand , 1994 .

[5]  L. Godfrey,et al.  REGRESSION EQUATIONS WHEN THE REGRESSORS INCLUDE LAGGED DEPENDENT VARIABLES , 1978 .

[6]  A. Alchian Reliability of Progress Curves in Airframe Production , 1963 .

[7]  Gordon MacKerron,et al.  Nuclear power and the characteristics of `ordinariness'--the case of UK energy policy , 2004 .

[8]  Deepak Sharma,et al.  Nuclear power versus fossil‐fuel power with CO2 capture and storage: a comparative analysis , 2008 .

[9]  C. Wene Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy , 2000 .

[10]  G. Hall,et al.  The experience curve from the economist's perspective , 1985 .

[11]  S. Kahouli-Brahmi,et al.  Testing for the presence of some features of increasing returns to adoption factors in energy system dynamics: An analysis via the learning curve approach , 2009 .

[12]  Antonio Soria,et al.  Modelling energy technology dynamics: methodology for adaptive expectations models with learning by doing and learning by searching , 2000 .

[13]  T. Breurch,et al.  A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation (econometrica vol 47 , 1979 .

[14]  A. Zellner Estimators for Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations: Some Exact Finite Sample Results , 1963 .

[15]  Bob van der Zwaan,et al.  Prospects for nuclear energy in Europe , 2008 .

[16]  Ernst R. Berndt,et al.  The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary. , 1992 .

[17]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[18]  Ferenc L. Toth,et al.  Oil and nuclear power: Past, present, and future B , 2006 .

[19]  Phillip F. Ostwald,et al.  Measurement of technology progress and capital cost for nuclear, coal-fired, and gas-fired power plants using the learning curve , 1979 .

[20]  S. Kahouli-Brahmi Technological learning in energy–environment–economy modelling: A survey , 2008 .

[21]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  The Effects of Learning by Doing on Nuclear Plant Operating Reliability , 1979 .

[22]  L. Argote,et al.  Learning Curves in Manufacturing , 1990, Science.

[23]  Peter J. Klenow,et al.  Learning-by-Doing Spillovers in the Semiconductor Industry , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  Antonio Soria,et al.  Technical change dynamics: evidence from the emerging renewable energy technologies , 2001 .

[25]  Lena Neij,et al.  Cost dynamics of wind power , 1999 .

[26]  Kari Luostarinen,et al.  Competitiveness Comparison of the Electricity Production Alternatives , 2004 .

[27]  Peter Holmes Kobos,et al.  Technological learning and renewable energy costs: implications for US renewable energy policy , 2004 .

[28]  Robert Fildes,et al.  The practice of econometrics: Classical and contemporary: Ernst R. Berndt, (Addison-Wesley Publishing company, Reading, Mass., 1991), pp. 702, $18.95 , 1992 .

[29]  Karin Ibenholt Explaining learning curves for wind power , 2002 .

[30]  Andreas Löschel,et al.  Technological Change in Economic Models of Environmental Policy: A Survey , 2002 .

[31]  Romney B. Duffey,et al.  Sustainable futures using nuclear energy , 2005 .

[32]  Jonathan Köhler,et al.  Technological change in energy systems: Learning curves, logistic curves and input–output coefficients , 2007 .

[33]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Experiments with a methodology to model the role of RD first results , 2004 .

[34]  Bob van der Zwaan Nuclear power and global climate change: security concerns of Asian developing countries , 2004 .

[35]  Bob van der Zwaan Nuclear energy: Tenfold expansion or phase-out? , 2002 .

[36]  D. F. Hendry,et al.  A Textbook of Econometrics. , 1974 .

[37]  S. D. Probert,et al.  Likely market-penetrations of renewable-energy technologies , 1998 .

[38]  J. Fisher,et al.  Energy crises in perspective , 1974 .

[39]  Donald W. Jones,et al.  The Economic Future of Nuclear Power , 2004 .

[40]  Stefano Esposto The possible role of nuclear energy in Italy , 2008 .

[41]  Lena Neij,et al.  Use of experience curves to analyse the prospects for diffusion and adoption of renewable energy technology , 1997 .

[42]  T. P. Wright,et al.  Factors affecting the cost of airplanes , 1936 .

[43]  Andrew Harvey,et al.  The Econometric Analysis of Time Series - 2nd Edition , 1990 .

[44]  D. Levhari,et al.  The Impact of Experience on Kibbutz Farming , 1973 .

[45]  S. Goldfeld,et al.  Some Tests for Homoscedasticity , 1965 .

[46]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Empirical challenges in the use of learning curves for assessing the economic prospects of renewable energy technologies , 2007 .

[47]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  The Future of Nuclear Power , 2012 .

[48]  I. C. Bupp,et al.  Economics of nuclear power , 1975 .

[49]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Learning rates for energy technologies , 2001 .

[50]  O. Sato,et al.  Reducing future CO2 emissions — The role of nuclear energy , 1998 .

[51]  Andrew Harvey,et al.  The econometric analysis of time series , 1991 .

[52]  Jacques Percebois The peaceful uses of nuclear energy: technologies of the front and back-ends of the fuel cycle , 2003 .

[53]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Global experience curves for wind farms , 2005 .

[54]  T. Breusch TESTING FOR AUTOCORRELATION IN DYNAMIC LINEAR MODELS , 1978 .

[55]  Peter Dunscombe,et al.  Bypassing the learning curve in permanent seed implants using state-of-the-art technology. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[56]  Steve Fetter,et al.  A Nuclear Solution to Climate Change? , 2000, Science.

[57]  Werner Z. Hirsch,et al.  Manufacturing Progress Functions , 1952 .

[58]  Paul D. Maycock,et al.  Business analysis of solar photovoltaic energy conversion , 1975 .

[59]  Marc Nerlove,et al.  Estimates of the Elasticities of Supply of Selected Agricultural Commodities , 1956 .

[60]  Maya Papineau,et al.  An economic perspective on experience curves and dynamic economies in renewable energy technologies , 2006 .

[61]  John P. Weyant,et al.  On the sources of technological change: What do the models assume , 2008 .

[62]  José Goldemberg The evolution of ethanol costs in Brazil , 1996 .

[63]  Asami Miketa,et al.  The impact of R&D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom , 2005 .

[64]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[65]  William E Mooz Cost Analysis of Light Water Reactor Power Plants , 1978 .

[66]  A. Zellner An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias , 1962 .

[67]  V. Amavilah The capitalist world aggregate supply and demand model for natural uranium , 1995 .