The Critical Period for Language Acquisition: Evidence from Second Language Learning.

SNOW, CATHERINE E., and HOEFNAGEL-H6HLE, MARIAN. The Critical Period for Language Acquistion: Evidence from Second Language Learning. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1978, 49, 1114-1128. The critical period hypothesis holds that first language acquisition must occur before cerebral lateralization is complete, at about the age of puberty. One prediction of this hypothesis is that second language acquisition will be relatively fast, successful, and qualitatively similar to first language only if it occurs before the age of puberty. This prediction was tested by studying longitudinally the naturalistic acquisition of Dutch by English speakers of different ages. The subjects were tested 3 times during their first year in Holland, with an extensive test battery designed to assess several aspects of their second language ability. It was found that the subjects in the age groups 12-15 and adult made the fastest progress during the first few months of learning Dutch and that at the end of the first year the 8-10and 12-15-year-olds had achieved the best control of Dutch. The 3-5-year-olds scored lowest on all the tests employed. These data do not support the critical period hypothesis for language acquisition.

[1]  Stephen Krashen,et al.  LATERALIZATION, LANGUAGE LEARNING, AND THE CRITICAL PERIOD: SOME NEW EVIDENCE , 1973 .

[2]  C. Snow,et al.  11. On the Secondary Nature of Syntactic Intuitions , 1977 .

[3]  John A. Rea.  Concerning the Validity of Lexicostatistics , 1958, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[4]  Ann K. Fathman.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AGE AND SECOND LANGUAGE PRODUCTIVE ABILITY , 1975 .

[5]  Stephen Krashen,et al.  The development of language in genie: a case of language acquisition beyond the “critical period” , 1974 .

[6]  G. Gascon,et al.  Language Disorder, Convulsive and Electroencephalographic: Acquired Syndrome in Children , 1973 .

[7]  J. Berko.  The Child's Learning of English Morphology , 1958 .

[8]  Sidney Greenbaum,et al.  Acceptability in language , 1977 .

[9]  Y. Lebrun,et al.  Recovery In Aphasics , 1976 .

[10]  B. P. Taylor,et al.  THE USE OF OVERGENERALIZATION AND TRANSFER LEARNING STRATEGIES BY ELEMENTARY AND INTERMEDIATE STUDENTS OF ESL1 , 1975 .

[11]  Breyne Arlene Moskowitz,et al.  ON THE STATUS OF VOWEL SHIFT IN ENGLISH , 1973 .

[12]  S. Krashen.  THE CRITICAL PERIOD FOR LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND ITS POSSIBLE BASES , 1975 .

[13]  C. Snow,et al.  Age Differences in the Pronunciation of Foreign Sounds , 1977, Language and speech.

[14]  Marina K. Burt,et al.  NATURAL SEQUENCES IN CHILD SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION1 , 1974 .

[15]  E. Lenneberg.  On explaining language. , 1969, Science.

[16]  Sarah C. Gudschinsky.  The ABC'S of Lexicostatistics (Glottochronology) , 1956 .

[17]  F Lhermitte,et al.  Acquired aphasia in children. , 1965, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  C. Worster-Drought.  An Unusual Form of Acquired Aphasia in Children , 1971, Folia phoniatrica.

[19]  S. Ervin-Tripp.  Is Second Language Learning Like the First , 1974 .

[20]  Marina K. Burt,et al.  A New Perspective on the Creative Construction Process in Child Second Language Acquisition. Working Papers on Bilingualism, No. 4. , 1974 .

[21]  E. Lenneberg.  Biological Foundations of Language , 1967 .

[22]  Vivian Cook,et al.  THE COMPARISON OF LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT IN NATIVE CHILDREN AND FOREIGN ADULTS , 1973 .

[23]  R. Harshman,et al.  Lateralization and the Critical Period , 1972 .

[24]  J. Asher,et al.  The learning strategy of the total physical response: some age differences. , 1967, Child development.

[25]  T. Scovel,et al.  FOREIGN ACCENTS, LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, AND CEREBRAL DOMINANCE1 , 1969 .

[26]  E. Guttmann.  APHASIA IN CHILDREN , 1942 .

[27]  M. Kinsbourne.  THE ONTOGENY OF CEREBRAL DOMINANCE , 1975, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.