Crack location in granitic samples submitted to heating, low confining pressure and axial loading

SUMMARY Until now, observations of mechanically and thermally induced microcracks in rocks could only be carried out by indirect measurements or destructive observations on samples brought back to atmospheric pressure conditions. A special triaxial test cell was designed in order to perform direct observations during loading. The use of a cell in tomography apparatus involves new devices: (1) a movable horizontal load frame around a scanner; and (2) a test cell transparent to X-rays, able to withstand up to 28 MPa maximum confining pressure and temperatures of up to 180°C. Volumetric strains are compared with radiological density measurements. The first processed X-ray images locating microcracks during propagation are also presented. Mineralogical eVects on the crack location can be demonstrated. Strain inferred from CT density measurement is clearly correlated with the strain usually measured by a strain gauge. DiVerent phases of mechanical behaviour are described: contracted phase and failure by macrocrack formation. The principal results obtained with this tool are the description of the porosity formation and macrocracking. Results show two principal factors localizing the porosity. First, the diVused porosity volume is controlled by mineralogical parameters, quartz and plagioclase grains, and boundaries of biotite grains during the thermal and mechanical loading. Second, macrocracking begins at the perimeter of the central section of core and grows towards the sample/piston interface. It seems that the first macrocracking is not located in the high-porosity zone formed during the loading phase, but in a relatively low-porosity zone.

[1]  J. Fredrich,et al.  Micromechanics of thermally induced cracking in three crustal rocks , 1986 .

[2]  F. Heuze,et al.  High-temperature mechanical, physical and Thermal properties of granitic rocks— A review , 1983 .

[3]  M. Toksöz,et al.  Thermal cracking and amplitude dependent attenuation , 1980 .

[4]  H. C. Heard,et al.  Thermal stress cracking in granite , 1989 .

[5]  D. Lockner.  The role of acoustic emission in the study of rock fracture , 1993 .

[6]  S. J. Green,et al.  Observation of brittle-deformation features at the maximum stress of westerly granite and solenhofen limestone , 1970 .

[7]  S. L. Wellington,et al.  X-ray computerized tomography , 1987 .

[8]  H. Yukutake.  Fracture nucleation process in intact rocks , 1992 .

[9]  R. A. Johns,et al.  Nondestructive measurements of fracture aperture in crystalline rock cores using X ray computed tomography , 1993 .

[10]  D. Hutchins,et al.  Ultrasonic imaging and acoustic emission monitoring of thermally induced microcracks in Lac du Bonnet granite , 1993 .

[11]  Chen Yong,et al.  Thermally induced acoustic emission in westerly granite , 1980 .

[12]  T. Reuschlé,et al.  α/β phase transition in quartz monitored using acoustic emissions , 1995 .

[13]  G. Simmons,et al.  The effect of cracks on the thermal expansion of rocks , 1977 .

[14]  Bernard Long,et al.  CAT-scan in marine stratigraphy: a quantitative approach , 1995 .

[15]  Paul Tapponnier,et al.  Development of stress-induced microcracks in Westerly Granite , 1976 .

[16]  S. Raynaud,et al.  Comparison between connected and overall porosity of thermally stressed granites , 1992 .

[17]  G. Hounsfield.  Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part I. Description of system. 1973. , 1973, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  O. Nishizawa,et al.  Hypocenter distribution and focal mechanism of AE events during two stress stage creep in Yugawara andesite , 1984 .