Segmentation of confocal microscope images of cell nuclei in thick tissue sections

Segmentation of intact cell nuclei from three‐dimensional (3D) images of thick tissue sections is an important basic capability necessary for many biological research studies. However, segmentation is often difficult because of the tight clustering of nuclei in many specimen types. We present a 3D segmentation approach that combines the recognition capabilities of the human visual system with the efficiency of automatic image analysis algorithms. The approach first uses automatic algorithms to separate the 3D image into regions of fluorescence‐stained nuclei and unstained background. This includes a novel step, based on the Hough transform and an automatic focusing algorithm to estimate the size of nuclei. Then, using an interactive display, each nuclear region is shown to the analyst, who classifies it as either an individual nucleus, a cluster of multiple nuclei, partial nucleus or debris. Next, automatic image analysis based on morphological reconstruction and the watershed algorithm divides clusters into smaller objects, which are reclassified by the analyst. Once no more clusters remain, the analyst indicates which partial nuclei should be joined to form complete nuclei. The approach was assessed by calculating the fraction of correctly segmented nuclei for a variety of tissue types: Caenorhabditis elegans embryos (839 correct out of a total of 848), normal human skin (343/362), benign human breast tissue (492/525), a human breast cancer cell line grown as a xenograft in mice (425/479) and invasive human breast carcinoma (260/335). Furthermore, due to the analyst's involvement in the segmentation process, it is always known which nuclei in a population are correctly segmented and which not, assuming that the analyst's visual judgement is correct.

[1]  W. Reeves Royal Microscopical Society , 1873, Nature.

[2]  Dana H. Ballard,et al.  Generalizing the Hough transform to detect arbitrary shapes , 1981, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Gunilla Borgefors,et al.  Distance transformations in digital images , 1986, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[4]  Ben J. H. Verwer,et al.  Improved metrics in image processing applied to the Hilditch skeleton , 1988, [1988 Proceedings] 9th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[5]  C. MacAulay,et al.  A comparison of some quick and simple threshold selection methods for stained cells. , 1988, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[6]  Hon-Son Don,et al.  3-D Moment Forms: Their Construction and Application to Object Identification and Positioning , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  P Dean,et al.  Proposed standard for image cytometry data files. , 1990, Cytometry.

[8]  A. M. Downs,et al.  Three-dimensional DNA image cytometry by confocal scanning laser microscopy in thick tissue blocks. , 1991, Cytometry.

[9]  S J Lockett,et al.  Automated fluorescence image cytometry. DNA quantification and detection of chlamydial infections. , 1991, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[10]  James C. Mullikin,et al.  The vector distance transform in two and three dimensions , 1992, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[11]  Ed Anderson,et al.  LAPACK users' guide - [release 1.0] , 1992 .

[12]  Lucas J. van Vliet,et al.  Binary and Grey-Value Skeletons: Metrics and Algorithms , 1993, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[13]  Piet W. Verbeek,et al.  Surface area estimation of digitized planes , 1993 .

[14]  Sim Heng Ong,et al.  Autofocusing for tissue microscopy , 1993, Image Vis. Comput..

[15]  J W Gray,et al.  Thick-section fluorescence in situ hybridization on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival tissue provides a histogenetic profile. , 1994, The American journal of pathology.

[16]  D. Albertson,et al.  DPY-27: A chromosome condensation protein homolog that regulates C. elegans dosage compensation through association with the X chromosome , 1994, Cell.

[17]  R Malladi,et al.  Image processing via level set curvature flow. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Advances in automated 3-D image analyses of cell populations imaged by confocal microscopy. , 1996, Cytometry.

[19]  A Liljeborg,et al.  Confocal 3-dimensional DNA image cytometry in thick tissue sections. , 1996, Cytometry.

[20]  J J Vaquero,et al.  Applying watershed algorithms to the segmentation of clustered nuclei. , 1998, Cytometry.

[21]  J P Rigaut,et al.  Three-dimensional DNA image cytometry by confocal scanning laser microscopy in thick tissue blocks of prostatic lesions. , 1997, Cytometry.

[22]  K. Rodenacker,et al.  Groping for Quantitative Digital 3-D Image Analysis: An Approach to Quantitative Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Thick Tissue Sections of Prostate Carcinoma , 1997, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[23]  R. Malladi,et al.  A unified geometric model for 3D confocal image analysis in cytology , 1998, Proceedings SIBGRAPI'98. International Symposium on Computer Graphics, Image Processing, and Vision (Cat. No.98EX237).

[24]  D Sudar,et al.  Efficient, interactive, and three-dimensional segmentation of cell nuclei in thick tissue sections. , 1998, Cytometry.