Near-shore Wind Power - Protected Seascapes, Environmentalists' Attitudes, and the Technocratic Planning Perspective

Summary In contested wind farm developments, the dominant issue concerns scenic impact and the landscape at the proposed site. The number of large wind power schemes that have failed is growing. The case analysed here is a near shore wind farm in the Dutch part of the Wadden Sea. In 2001 this was the largest wind project ever proposed in the Netherlands (278 MW), but it failed. The government refused to negotiate with civil society organisations representing various landscape values, primarily with the WaddenVereniging and its allies. The often suggested idea that siting wind farms offshore could solve the problems encountered onshore is naive and far too simple. Siting issues offshore are just as relevant as onshore, as this case study illustrates. As most current offshore developments, the case also concerns a near-shore development. It would have been highly visible in an iconic landscape. In such cases, the main dialogue is similar to onshore schemes, which is about impact on the landscape, or ‘seascape’, as perceived by the public. The paper provides an historic landscape description of the area, highlighting significant natural, ecological and cultural heritage and its importance for tourism and the rural economy. Some of these have high identification values. The acceptability and the assessment of different qualities in relation to wind farm siting are analysed with a survey among members of the WaddenVereniging, the national environmental organization for the protection of the Wadden region. The analysis reveals that these environmentalists believe that there are suitable sites for wind turbines in a sensitive area like the Wadden. However, the spatial layout that was chosen by the developers was based on a landscape assessment of the governmental architect. This was a highly technocratic, top-down decision that did not take account of the landscape preferences of the public. This decision evoked its opposition, and eventually, the WaddenVereniging succeeded in generating sufficient national political support to scupper this project.

[1]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation , 2007 .

[2]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action , 2009 .

[3]  A. Lothian.  Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder? , 1999 .

[4]  C. Vlek,et al.  The influence of planned-change context on the evaluation of natural landscapes , 1998 .

[5]  Frans van Waarden,et al.  Dimensions and types of policy networks , 1992 .

[6]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind energy policies in the Netherlands: Institutional capacity-building for ecological modernisation , 2007 .

[7]  Alain Nadaï,et al.  Wind power planning in France (Aveyron), from state regulation to local planning , 2009 .

[8]  Claire Haggett.  Over the Sea and Far Away? A Consideration of the Planning, Politics and Public Perception of Offshore Wind Farms , 2008 .

[9]  M. Wolsink,et al.  The motives for accepting or rejecting waste infrastructure facilities. Shifting the focus from the planners' perspective to fairness and community commitment , 2009 .

[10]  G. Ellis,et al.  Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-Methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals , 2007 .

[11]  M. Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison. , 2007 .

[12]  Jacob Ladenburg,et al.  Visual impact assessment of offshore wind farms and prior experience , 2009 .

[13]  Hans C. Sørensen,et al.  EXPERIENCE WITH AND STRATEGIES FOR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN OFFSHORE WIND PROJECTS , 2002 .

[14]  Christina von Haaren,et al.  The German way to greenways and habitat networks , 2006 .

[15]  H. Lund.  Choice awareness: the development of technological and institutional choice in the public debate of Danish energy planning , 2000 .

[16]  Tobias Chilla.  The political relevance of discourses on space: The political relevance of discourses on space> , 2007 .

[17]  Paul Opdam,et al.  Ecological networks: A spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes , 2006 .

[18]  Mhairi Aitken,et al.  Locating ‘power’ in wind power planning processes: the (not so) influential role of local objectors , 2008 .

[19]  D. Horst.  NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[20]  Walter J.V. Vermeulen,et al.  The relative importance of social and institutional conditions in the planning of wind power projects , 2009 .

[21]  David Still,et al.  Offshore wind at Blyth , 2001 .

[22]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Visual assessment of off-shore wind turbines: The influence of distance, contrast, movement and social variables , 2007 .

[23]  Karen N. Scott.  Tilting at Offshore Windmills: Regulating Wind Farm Development Within the Renewable Energy Zone , 2005 .

[24]  K. C Tong,et al.  Technical and economic aspects of a floating offshore wind farm , 1998 .

[25]  K. Dijkema,et al.  Impact prognosis for salt marshes from subsidence by gas extraction in the Wadden Sea , 1997 .

[26]  A. Gill.  Offshore renewable energy - ecological implications of generating electricity in the coastal zone. , 2005 .

[27]  Jacob Ladenburg,et al.  Attitudes towards on-land and offshore wind power development in Denmark; choice of development strategy , 2008 .

[28]  Christopher Snary,et al.  Understanding Risk: The Planning Officers' Perspective , 2004 .

[29]  C. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 1983 .

[30]  Merylyn McKenzie Hedger.  Wind power: challenges to planning policy in the UK , 1995 .

[31]  J. M. Marquenie,et al.  Impact assessment on exploration drilling in the Wadden Sea, the Netherlands , 1998 .

[32]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Pay-offs and penalties of competing migratory schedules , 2003 .

[33]  Marit Vorkinn,et al.  Environmental Concern in a Local Context , 2001 .

[34]  Heli Saarikoski,et al.  Environmental impact assessment (EIA) as collaborative learning process , 2000 .

[35]  R. Boddeke,et al.  The Dutch Wadden Sea: a changed ecosystem , 1993, Hydrobiologia.

[36]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[37]  Cornelis Disco,et al.  Remaking “Nature”: The Ecological Turn in Dutch Water Management , 2002 .

[38]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Invalid theory impedes our understanding: A critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY , 2006 .

[39]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[40]  Tim Gray,et al.  Offshore wind farms and commercial fisheries in the UK: A study in Stakeholder Consultation , 2005 .

[41]  Richard Cowell,et al.  Scoping in environmental impact assessment: Balancing precaution and efficiency? , 2006 .

[42]  T. Daniel,et al.  Good looking: in defense of scenic landscape aesthetics , 2002 .

[43]  J.C.J.M. van den Bergh,et al.  Policy failure and stakeholder dissatisfaction in complex ecosystem management: The case of the Dutch Wadden Sea shellfishery , 2006 .

[44]  R. Boddeke,et al.  The Dutch Wadden Sea: a changed ecosystem , 1993, Hydrobiologia.

[45]  Marta I. González,et al.  Participación, comunicación y negociación en conflictos ambientales: energía eólica marina en el Mar de Trafalgar , 2005 .

[46]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences? , 2008 .

[47]  Oluf Danielsen,et al.  Large scale wind power in Denmark , 1995 .

[48]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  River basin approach and integrated water management: Governance pitfalls for the Dutch Space-Water-Adjustment Management Principle , 2006 .

[49]  Richard Cowell,et al.  Wind power and ‘the planning problem’: the experience of Wales , 2007 .

[50]  Maria Johansson,et al.  Intention to respond to local wind turbines: the role of attitudes and visual perception , 2007 .

[51]  Simon Bell,et al.  Landscape: Pattern, Perception and Process , 1999 .

[52]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland , 2010 .

[53]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Policy Beliefs in Spatial Decisions: Contrasting Core Beliefs Concerning Space-making for Waste Infrastructure , 2004 .

[54]  Heike K. Lotze,et al.  Radical changes in the Wadden Sea fauna and flora over the last 2,000 years , 2005, Helgoland Marine Research.

[55]  Jeremy Firestone,et al.  Public acceptance of offshore wind power projects in the USA , 2009 .

[56]  B. H. Buck,et al.  Reflections on integrating operation and maintenance activities of offshore wind farms and Mariculture , 2009 .

[57]  C. Lant,et al.  Welcoming the Wind? Determinants of Wind Power Development Among U.S. States , 2009 .